In this commentary, I will only raise a couple of methodological questions that may help clarify the rich content of Barberousses’s paper.
While taking into account an interesting feature in the evolution of physics – the process of making explicit the content and meaning of a physical theory – Barberousse tries to develop an important topic, namely the central difficulty one encounters when comparing scientific theories and considering scientific revolution: how to define the parameters of what we call “a theory.” In fact it is often difficult to apply to concrete cases Kuhn’s notion of “normal science” and the various features he attributes to it. Barberousse gives some examples of these difficulties in the case of “classical mechanics.”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
D’Alembert (1990) Traité de dynamique. In G. Jacques (ed.). Paris.
Newton, I. (1999) Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, I. B. Cohen and A. Whitman (trans.). Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ly, I. (2008). Commentary on “From One Version to the Other: Intra-Theoretical Change”, by Anouk Barberousse. In: Soler, L., Sankey, H., Hoyningen-Huene, P. (eds) Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 255. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6274-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6279-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawHistory (R0)