It is a pleasure to comment on Professor Bird’s paper because it is part of the excellent work he has done on Kuhn’s philosophy (most importantly Bird, 2000, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005). His work is especially valuable to me because for the first time an author has provided a fully worked out interpretation of Kuhn that appears to be a real alternative to my own. His alternative interpretation has been intellectually liberating, offering a possible exit sign out of a reading of Kuhn that appeared unavoidable to me. Bird is entirely justified in stressing those elements in Kuhn’s theory that he calls “naturalistic”, providing a contrast to those elements that I stressed and that may be termed “Neo-Kantian”.
However, in the present paper Bird suggests an exciting new possibility that neither he nor I have seriously considered before, namely a possible reconciliation between the naturalistic and the Neo-Kantian view of Kuhn regarding world change (p. 36). In this commentary, I would like to pursue this line because it appears to be fruitful. Let me begin by first pinning down the contrast that is at issue.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bird, A. (2000) Thomas Kuhn. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bird, A. (2002) Kuhn’s Wrong Turning. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 33, 443–463.
Bird, A. (2003) Kuhn, Nominalism, and Empiricism. Philosophy of Science, 70(4), 690–719.
Bird, A. (2004) Kuhn, Naturalism, and the Positivist Legacy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 35, 337–356.
Bird, A. (2005) Naturalizing Kuhn. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 105, 109–127.
Einstein, A. (1949) Remarks Concerning the Essays Brought Together in this Co-operative Volume. In: P. A. Schilpp (ed.). Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist,Vol. 2, La Salle: Open Court, pp. 665–688.
Hoyningen-Huene, P. (1993) Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Rosenthal-Schneider, I. (1949) Presuppositions and Anticipations in Einstein’s Physics. In: P. A. Schilpp (ed.). Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, Vol. 1, La Salle: Open Court, pp. 131–146.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hoyningen-Huene, P. (2008). Commentary on Bird’s Paper. In: Soler, L., Sankey, H., Hoyningen-Huene, P. (eds) Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 255. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6274-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6279-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawHistory (R0)