Lena Soler discusses a purportedly new form of incommensurability, which she refers to as “machinic literal incommensurability”. She also employs the expression “experimental incommensurability” to refer to roughly the same thing. As the former is a bit of a mouthful, I will opt for the latter expression.
Experimental incommensurability relates to variation in equipment and associated experimental practices across different laboratory contexts. It arises because no common measure exists between different instruments and practices associated with these different instruments. Such an absence of common measure between different instruments and practices is supposed to constitute a new and distinct form of incommensurability. It contrasts with the standard semantic form of incommensurability which arises due to semantic variation between the vocabulary utilized by theories. It also contrasts with methodological forms of incommensurability which arise due to variation in the methodological norms employed for the evaluation of alternative scientific theories. Experimental incommensurability arises due to variation of equipment and experimental practice between experimental settings. It has nothing to do with the meaning or reference of scientific terms, nor has it anything to do with the norms of scientific theory appraisal.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Feyerabend, P. (1981) Reply to Criticism: Comments on Smart, Sellars and Putnam. In Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 104–131.
Kuhn, T. S. (1996) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (2000) The Road Since Structure. In J. Conant and J. Haugeland (eds.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Sankey, H. (1998) Taxonomic Incommensurability. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 12, 7–16.
Scheffler, I. (1967) Science and Subjectivity. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
Shapere, D. (1966) Meaning and Scientific Change. In R. G. Colodny (ed.) Mind and Cosmos. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 41–85.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sankey, H. (2008). Some Reflections on Experimental Incommensurability. In: Soler, L., Sankey, H., Hoyningen-Huene, P. (eds) Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 255. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6274-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6279-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawHistory (R0)