The first thing to realize about Teller’s paper is that the title is somewhat ironic. He in fact argues that, given a proper understanding of scientific practice, incommensurability, understood as “semantic incommensurability”, is no problem. But there is another notion of incommensurability, which Teller and some others call “value incommensurabity”. In this sense, he argues, incommensurability is ubiquitous, but also not a problem. Thus, incommensurability is not a problem for a sound understanding of scientific practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cartwright, N. D. (1983) How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarenden.
Cartwright, N. D. (1989) Nature’s Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cartwright, N. D. (1999) The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Giere, R. N. (1988) Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Giere, R. N. (1999) Science Without Laws. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Giere, R. N. (2006a) Scientific Perspectivism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Giere, R. N. (2006b) Perspectival Pluralism, in S. Kellert, H. Longino, and C. K. Waters, eds., Scientific Pluralism, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. XIX. University of Minnesota Press.
Kellert, S., Longino, H., and Waters, C. K. (eds.) (2006) Scientific Pluralism, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. XIX. University of Minnesota Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1977) Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice. In The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 321–339.
Morgan, M. S. and M. Morrison (eds.) (1999) Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Suppe, F. (1989) The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Teller, P. (2001) Twilight of the Perfect Model Model. Erkenntnis, 55, 393–415.
van Fraassen, B. C. (1980) The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van Fraassen, B. C. (1989) Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Giere, R.N. (2008). Incommensurability from a Modelling Perspective. In: Soler, L., Sankey, H., Hoyningen-Huene, P. (eds) Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 255. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6274-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6279-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawHistory (R0)