Skip to main content

A Comparative Study Regarding a Memory Hierarchy with the CDLR SPEC 2000 Simulator

  • Conference paper

Abstract

We have built a simulator named, CDLR SPEC 2000. This simulator is based on traces for systems with cache memories. With CDLR SPEC 2000 program we can study, for a memory hierarcy, the next parameters: maping function, block size, writing strategies, replacement algoritm, size of cache memory, number of cache sets (for the set associative caches), number of words form a block. The simulator can be used for the study of cache memory behaviour. Also the CDLR SPEC 2000 program, introduce the calculus of CDLR of a memory hierarchy. A common metric used for the assessment of overall reliability, in a memory hierarchy is the Mean Time To Failure (MTTF), but it doesn’t take into account for the time of data storage in each level. We propose another metric, Cache Data Loss Rate (CDLR), for this reason. We will derive a recurrent formula for computing CDLR, and we will validate it by computer simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. David A. Paterson, John L. Henessy – “Computer architecture. a quantitative approach”, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc. 1990-1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Peter M. Chen, David E. Lowell.,. Reliability hierarchies. workshop on hot topics in operating systems, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Novac Ovidiu, Gordan M, Novac M., Data loss rate versus mean time to failure in memory hierarchies. Proceedings of the CISSE’05,University of Bridgeport, USA, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ooi, Y., M. Kashimura, H. Takeuchi, and E. Kawamura, Fault-tolerant architecture in a cache memory control LSI, IEEE J. of Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 27,No. 4, pp. 507-514, April 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Philip P. Shirvani and Edward J. McCluskey, “PADded cache: a new fault-tolerance technique for cache memories”, Computer Systems Laboratory, Technical Report No. 00-802, Stanford University, Stanford, California, December 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miguel A. Vega-Rodríguez, “SMPCache simulator”. Available at http://arco.unex.es/smpcache.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Novac, O., Vlădutiu, M., Kakas, S.V., Novac, M., Gordan, M. (2007). A Comparative Study Regarding a Memory Hierarchy with the CDLR SPEC 2000 Simulator. In: Sobh, T. (eds) Innovations and Advanced Techniques in Computer and Information Sciences and Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6268-1_66

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6268-1_66

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6267-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6268-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics