Skip to main content
  • 1880 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C.J. Date, An Introduction to Database Systems, 8th ed., Boston: Pearson/Addison Wesley, (2003).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Stonebraker, L.A. Rowe, B. Lindsay, J. Gray, M. Carey, M. Brodie, P. Bernstein, and D. Beech “Third-generation database system manifesto,” Computer Standards and Interfaces, vol. 13, no. 1-3, pp. 41-54, Oct. (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Seshadri, “Enhanced abstract data types in object-relational databases,” The VLDB Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, (1998), pp. 130-140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C.J. Date, and H. Darwen, Foundation for Future Database Systems: The Third Manifesto, 2nd ed. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C.J. Date and H. Darwen, Databases, Types and the Relational Model, 3rd edn, Addison Wesley, (2006). Chapter 4 – The Third Manifesto. Retrieved August 13, (2006), from http://www.dcs.warwick.ac.uk/$∼ $hugh/TTM/CHAP04.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Melton, ISO/IEC 9075-2:2003 (E) Information technology — Database languages — SQL — Part 2: Foundation (SQL/Foundation). August, (2003). Retrieved December 26, (2004), from http://www.wiscorp.com/SQLStandards.html

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Calero, F. Ruiz, A.L Baroni, F.B. Abreu F, and M. Piattini, “An Ontological Approach to Describe the SQL:2003 Object-Relational Features,” Journal of Computer Standards & Interfaces. vol. 28, issue 6. pp. 695-713, (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  8. E.F. Codd, C.J. Date, “Interactive support for non-programmers: The relational and network approaches,” In: Proceedings of the 1975 ACM SIGFIDET (now SIGMOD) workshop on Data description, access and control, (1975), pp. 11-41.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Eessaar, “Using Relational Databases in the Engineering Repository Systems,” In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Paphos, Cyprus, May 23 -27, (2006), Databases and Information Systems Integration, pp. 30 – 37.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Seidewitz, “What models mean,” IEEE Software, vol. 20, issue 5, pp. 26-31, Sept.-Oct. (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. DMTF Common Information Model (CIM) Standards. CIM Schema Ver. 2.13. Database specification. Retrieved October 16, 2006 from http://www.dmtf.org/standards/cim/cim_schema_v213/

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Greenfield, K. Short, S. Cook, and S. Kent, Software Factories: Assembling Applications with Patterns, Models, Frameworks, and Tools. USA: John Wiley & Sons, (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  13. E.F. Codd, “Data models in database management,” SIGART Bull., 74, pp. 112-114, Jan. (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Chaudhuri, and G. Weikum, “Rethinking Database System Architecture: Towards a Self-tuning RISC-style Database System,” In: Proceedings of Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, 2000, pp. 1-10.

    Google Scholar 

  15. L.M Braz, “Visual syntax diagrams for programming language statements,” In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual international Conference on Systems Documentation. New York: ACM Press, 1990, pp. 23-27.

    Google Scholar 

  16. OMG Unified Modeling Language Specification formal/03-03-01. March (2003). Version 1.5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Mühlen, “Evaluation of Workflow Management Systems Using Meta Models,” In: Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’99), 1999, vol. Track5, pp. 1-11.

    Google Scholar 

  18. I. Davies, P. Green, S. Milton, and M. Rosemann, “Using Meta Models for the Comparison of Ontologies,” In: Proceedings Evaluation of Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design Workshop - EMMSAD’03, Klagenfurt/Velden, Austria, (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Richters, and M. Gogolla, “A Metamodel for OCL,” In: Lecture Notes In Computer Science, issue 1723, Springer, 1999, pp. 156-171.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Habela, M. Roantree, and K. Subieta, “Flattening the Metamodel for Object Databases,” In: Proceedings of the 6th East European Conference on Advances in Databases and Information Systems, Bratislava, Slovakia, Sept. 8-11, (2002). LNCS 2435, Springer, 2002, pp. 263-276.

    Google Scholar 

  21. K. Siau, and M. Rossi, “Evaluation of Information Modeling Methods – A Review,” In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 5, 1998, p. 314.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Rossi, and S. Brinkkemper, “Complexity Metrics for Systems Development Methods and Techniques,” Information Systems, vol. 21, no. 2, 1996, pp. 209-227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. A.L. Opdahl and B. Henderson-Sellers, “Ontological Evaluation of the UML Using the Bunge–Wand–Weber Model,” Software and Systems Modeling, vol. 1, issue 1, pp. 43 – 67, Sept. (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  24. E.F. Codd, “A relational model of large shared data banks,” Comm. ACM, vol. 13, no. 6, 1970, pp. 377-387.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. C. Larman, Applying UML and Patterns: An Introduction to Object-Oriented Analysis and Design and the Unified Process, 2nd edn, Upper Saddle River, USA: Prentice Hall, (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  26. C. Türker, and M. Gertz, “Semantic integrity support in SQL:1999 and commercial (object-) relational database management systems,” The VLDB Journal, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 241–269, (2001).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Eessaar, E. (2007). Metamodel-based Comparison of Data Models. In: Elleithy, K. (eds) Advances and Innovations in Systems, Computing Sciences and Software Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6264-3_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6264-3_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6263-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6264-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics