Metamodel-based Comparison of Data Models

  • Erki Eessaar
Conference paper

Keywords

Milton 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    C.J. Date, An Introduction to Database Systems, 8th ed., Boston: Pearson/Addison Wesley, (2003).MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    M. Stonebraker, L.A. Rowe, B. Lindsay, J. Gray, M. Carey, M. Brodie, P. Bernstein, and D. Beech “Third-generation database system manifesto,” Computer Standards and Interfaces, vol. 13, no. 1-3, pp. 41-54, Oct. (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    P. Seshadri, “Enhanced abstract data types in object-relational databases,” The VLDB Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, (1998), pp. 130-140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    C.J. Date, and H. Darwen, Foundation for Future Database Systems: The Third Manifesto, 2nd ed. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, (2000).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    C.J. Date and H. Darwen, Databases, Types and the Relational Model, 3rd edn, Addison Wesley, (2006). Chapter 4 – The Third Manifesto. Retrieved August 13, (2006), from http://www.dcs.warwick.ac.uk/$∼ $hugh/TTM/CHAP04.pdfGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    J. Melton, ISO/IEC 9075-2:2003 (E) Information technology — Database languages — SQL — Part 2: Foundation (SQL/Foundation). August, (2003). Retrieved December 26, (2004), from http://www.wiscorp.com/SQLStandards.htmlGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    C. Calero, F. Ruiz, A.L Baroni, F.B. Abreu F, and M. Piattini, “An Ontological Approach to Describe the SQL:2003 Object-Relational Features,” Journal of Computer Standards & Interfaces. vol. 28, issue 6. pp. 695-713, (2005).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    E.F. Codd, C.J. Date, “Interactive support for non-programmers: The relational and network approaches,” In: Proceedings of the 1975 ACM SIGFIDET (now SIGMOD) workshop on Data description, access and control, (1975), pp. 11-41.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    E. Eessaar, “Using Relational Databases in the Engineering Repository Systems,” In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Paphos, Cyprus, May 23 -27, (2006), Databases and Information Systems Integration, pp. 30 – 37.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    E. Seidewitz, “What models mean,” IEEE Software, vol. 20, issue 5, pp. 26-31, Sept.-Oct. (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    DMTF Common Information Model (CIM) Standards. CIM Schema Ver. 2.13. Database specification. Retrieved October 16, 2006 from http://www.dmtf.org/standards/cim/cim_schema_v213/Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    J. Greenfield, K. Short, S. Cook, and S. Kent, Software Factories: Assembling Applications with Patterns, Models, Frameworks, and Tools. USA: John Wiley & Sons, (2004).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    E.F. Codd, “Data models in database management,” SIGART Bull., 74, pp. 112-114, Jan. (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    S. Chaudhuri, and G. Weikum, “Rethinking Database System Architecture: Towards a Self-tuning RISC-style Database System,” In: Proceedings of Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, 2000, pp. 1-10.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    L.M Braz, “Visual syntax diagrams for programming language statements,” In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual international Conference on Systems Documentation. New York: ACM Press, 1990, pp. 23-27.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    OMG Unified Modeling Language Specification formal/03-03-01. March (2003). Version 1.5.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    M. Mühlen, “Evaluation of Workflow Management Systems Using Meta Models,” In: Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’99), 1999, vol. Track5, pp. 1-11.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    I. Davies, P. Green, S. Milton, and M. Rosemann, “Using Meta Models for the Comparison of Ontologies,” In: Proceedings Evaluation of Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design Workshop - EMMSAD’03, Klagenfurt/Velden, Austria, (2003).Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    M. Richters, and M. Gogolla, “A Metamodel for OCL,” In: Lecture Notes In Computer Science, issue 1723, Springer, 1999, pp. 156-171.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    P. Habela, M. Roantree, and K. Subieta, “Flattening the Metamodel for Object Databases,” In: Proceedings of the 6th East European Conference on Advances in Databases and Information Systems, Bratislava, Slovakia, Sept. 8-11, (2002). LNCS 2435, Springer, 2002, pp. 263-276.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    K. Siau, and M. Rossi, “Evaluation of Information Modeling Methods – A Review,” In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 5, 1998, p. 314.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    M. Rossi, and S. Brinkkemper, “Complexity Metrics for Systems Development Methods and Techniques,” Information Systems, vol. 21, no. 2, 1996, pp. 209-227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    A.L. Opdahl and B. Henderson-Sellers, “Ontological Evaluation of the UML Using the Bunge–Wand–Weber Model,” Software and Systems Modeling, vol. 1, issue 1, pp. 43 – 67, Sept. (2002).Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    E.F. Codd, “A relational model of large shared data banks,” Comm. ACM, vol. 13, no. 6, 1970, pp. 377-387.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    C. Larman, Applying UML and Patterns: An Introduction to Object-Oriented Analysis and Design and the Unified Process, 2nd edn, Upper Saddle River, USA: Prentice Hall, (2002).Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    C. Türker, and M. Gertz, “Semantic integrity support in SQL:1999 and commercial (object-) relational database management systems,” The VLDB Journal, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 241–269, (2001).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erki Eessaar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of InformaticsTallinn University of TechnologyESTONIA

Personalised recommendations