Skip to main content

Computer-aided Building Design Education: Simulating the Design Process in a Project-Based Learning Curriculum

  • Conference paper
Innovations in E-learning, Instruction Technology, Assessment, and Engineering Education
  • 2745 Accesses

Abstract

Teaching computer-aided building design (CABD) in a project-based learning environment is an idea derived from the broader problem-based learning movement. However, a project-based learning curriculum has rarely been implemented in building design education, let alone in CABD. The idea of teaching CABD through design-based approaches has been increasingly adopted over the past 20 years. However, most of the resulting experiments have been limited to specific courses within larger programmes. This approach has rarely affected a dedicated CABD curriculum. The development and implementation of a feasible project-based learning CABD curriculum is described in this paper. In this programme the emphasis is placed on the building aspects and/or objectives of the design process rather than on the different products of the design phases or even on software categories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boud, D. and Feletti, G. (1997) The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning, Kogan Page Ltd, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bridges, A. H. (2006) A Critical Review of Problem Based Learning in Architectural Education, in eCAADe proceedings, Lisbon, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Margetson, Don (1997) Why is Problem-based Learning a Challenge?, in Boud, D. and Feletti, G. (1997) The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning, Kogan Page Ltd, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Maitland, B. (1997) Problem-based Learning for Architecture and Construction Management, in Boud, D. and Feletti, G. (1997) The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning, Kogan Page Ltd, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldman, Glenn and Zdepski, Stephen (1987) Form, Color & Movement, Integrating Computers into the Architectural Curriculum in ACADIA Conference Proceedings, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA, pp. 39-50.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kalisperis, L. (1996) CAD in Education: Penn State, in ACADIA Quarterly, volume 15, number 3 (summer): 22-25.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Marx, John: 1998, A Proposal for Alternative Methods for Teaching Digital Design, in Wyk, S. Van and Seebohm, T. (Editors), Digital Design Studios: Do Computers Make a Difference?: 59-73, ACADIA’98 Proceedings, Québec City, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson, B. R. (2000) Sustaining Studio Culture: How well do Internet Tools Meet the Needs of Virtual Design Studios?, in Donath, D. (editor) Promise and Reality, eCAADe proceedings, Bauhaus-Universität, Weimar.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rügemer, J. and Russel, P. (2000) Promise and Reality: The impact of the Virtual Design Studio on the design and learning process in architectural education, in Donath, D. (editor) Promise and Reality, eCAADe proceedings, Bauhaus-Universität, Weimar.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wyeld, T., Woodbury, R. and Shannon, S. (2001) Leitmotif Cases for Design Learning, in Gero, J., Chase, S. and Rosenman, M. (Editors), CAADRIA 2001, University of Sydney, Faculty of Architecture, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Juroszek, S. (1999) Access, Instruction, Application: Towards a Universal Lab, in Brown, A., Knight, M. and Berridge, P. (editors) Architectural Computing: from Turing to 2000, University of Liverpool, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Logan, B. (1986) The Structure of Design Problems, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Strathclyde University, Glasgow.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rittel, H.W.J. (1972) Son of Rittelthink, in Design Methods Group Occasional Paper number 1.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lawson, B. (1980) How Designers Think. Oxford, UK: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cross, N., Christiaans, H. and Dorst, K. (1996) Analysing Design Activity, Wiley, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mustoe, J. (1990) Artificial Intelligence and its Application in Architectural Design, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Strathclyde University, Glasgow.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goel, V. (1995) Sketches of Thought, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Silva, N.F., Lima, E.M. (2007). Computer-aided Building Design Education: Simulating the Design Process in a Project-Based Learning Curriculum. In: Iskander, M. (eds) Innovations in E-learning, Instruction Technology, Assessment, and Engineering Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6262-9_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6262-9_49

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6261-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6262-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics