Skip to main content
  • 2708 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adamchik, V. and A. Gunawardena, A Learning Objects Approach to Teaching Programming. School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Advanced Distribuited Learning (ADL), Sharable Content Object Reference Model, SCORM versión 1.0. 2006, ADL. p. 1-43.

    Google Scholar 

  3. AlerSite, WEB Site performance. 2005: USA.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alliance of remote Instructional Authoring and Distribution Networks for Europe (ARIADNE), Presentation of the ARIADNE Foundation, Background. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Apple Learning Interchange (ALI), Resources. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aviation Industry Computer-Based Training Committee (AICC), About AICC. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Balci, O. and N. Dwight Barnette, Online Interactive Modules for Teaching Computer Science. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Belanger, F. and D.H. Jordan. Evaluation and Implementation of Distance Learning: technologies, tools and technique. in Idea Group Publishing. 2000. London.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Burrell, S.C., Planning and Implementing an E-Business Strategy: “Administrative, Instructional and Web Portal Systems.’ 2000: USA. p. 2-5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Caeiro-Rodríguez, M., L. Anido-Rifón, and M. Llamas-Nistal, A Perspective and Pattern-based Evaluation Framework of EMLs’ Expressiveness for Collaborative Learning: Application to IMS LD. 2005: p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Collins, H., Corporate Portals:revolutionizing Information Access to Increase Productivity and Drive the Botton Line. Vol. Vol. I. 2001, Broadway, NY, USA: Amazon.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Davydov, M.M., Corporate portals and e-business integration. Vol. I. 2003, NY, USA: M. Hill. Emerging Business Technology Series. 56-57, 125-129.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Information Systems Audit and Control Fundation, Control Objectives For Net Centric Technology Intranet/Extranet/Internet. 2000. III: p. 10-11.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Instructional Management System (IMS), La Especificación Instructional Management System. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. ISACA, Intranet/Extranet/Internet, ed. I.S.A.a.C. Foundation. 1999, Rolling Meadows, IL, USA: Information Systems Audit and Control Foundation. 10-29, 29-109.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kirkpatrick, D.L., Evaluación de Acciones Formativas: los cuatro niveles, ed. E.-G. 2000. Vol. I. 1999, Barcelona, España.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Learning Architectures and Learning Objects (LALO), About LALO. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Learning Technology Standars Commitee (LTSC), Learning Technology Standars Commitee. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. LOM Standard, Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata. 2003: p. IEEE P1484.12/D4.0.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mantyla, K., Evaluating Program Succes. Distance Learning Yearbook. 2000: p. pp. 259-287.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Martínez González, R.A., et al., Calidad de los procesos de formación en entornos virtuales y su repercusión en la reutilización de objetos de aprendizaje. Necesidad de la Evaluación Inicial. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  22. MERLOT, MERLOT. Multimedia Educational Resources for Learning and Online Teaching. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Morales, E., et al., Propuesta de Evaluación de Objetos de Aprendizaje. 2004, Universidad de Salamanca: Salamanca, España. p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Najjar, J., et al., Finding Appropriate Learning Object: An Empirical Evaluation. 2004, Computer Science Department, K.U.Leuven: Leuven, Belgium. p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  25. National Fundation Science (ESCOT), Educational Software Components of Tomorrow (ESCOT). 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nesbit, J., K. Belfer, and J. Vargo, A convergent participation model for evaluation of learning objects. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology., 2002. Volume 28(3) Fall / autumn.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Oliver, M., Innovation in the Evaluation of Learning Technology. London. University of North London., 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Oliver, R., A teaching and learning perspective on learning objects. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Permanand, M. and B. Kei Daniel, A New Distance Education Model for the University of the West Indies: A Learning Objects’ Approach. 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  30. QUIS, Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction (QUIS), University of Maryland. 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Research Channel, Explore our more than 3,000 titles available online. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rosenberg, M., E-learning:estrategias para transmitir conocimiento en la era digital. 2001, Bogota, Colombia: MacGraw Hill Inter americana.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rosson, M.B., and J.M. Carroll, Usability Engineering: scenario-based developement of HCI. 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rubio, M.J., Focus and Models of Evaluation of E-Learning, in RELIEVE (Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa). 2003. p. 101-120.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sosteric, M. and S. Hesemeier, When is a Learning Object not an Object: A first step towards a theory of learning objects. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Vol 3, No 2 (2002), 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  36. W3C, WAI. 2005: USA. p. 1-3.

    Google Scholar 

  37. W3C, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. 2004: USA.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wiley, D., “Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy’. 2000: p. 1-35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vargas, M., Ortega, M. (2007). Floe-T: Tool To Measure The Quality In Learning Objects. In: Iskander, M. (eds) Innovations in E-learning, Instruction Technology, Assessment, and Engineering Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6262-9_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6262-9_45

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6261-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6262-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics