Skip to main content

Undergraduate Students Assessment on Materials Chemistry Topic using an Auto-Calibrated Online System

  • Conference paper
Innovations in E-learning, Instruction Technology, Assessment, and Engineering Education

Abstract

Development of communication and information technology had an important impact on teaching, learning and knowledge assessment. According with national trends in objective evaluation of undergraduate students’ knowledge, starting with experiences obtained by creation of the multiple choices examination system for general chemistry, an auto-calibrated online evaluation system has been developed. The aim of the research was to assess the first year undergraduate students’ knowledge on materials chemistry topic at the Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, the Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania by using the developed auto-calibrated online evaluation system. The testing and evaluation methodologies are presented. The students’ performances in terms of individual correct answers score and the average time per correct answer were collected and analyzed. The proposed auto-calibrated online evaluation system proved to offer a stable and valid evaluation environment for undergraduate students’ knowledge assessment on materials chemistry topic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. E. Segers, and L. Verhoeven, “Long-term effects of computer training of phonological awareness in kindergarten”, J. Comput. Assist. Lear., vol. 21, issue 1, pp. 17-27, February 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. E. H. Khan, “Use of computer-assisted learning in a primary school”, Computers & Education, vol. 13, issue 4, pp. 355-362, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Albirini, “Teachers’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies: the case of Syrian EFL teachers”, Computers & Education, vol. 47, issue 4, pp. 373-398, December 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Meijer, and F. Riemersma, “Teaching and testing mathematical problem solving by offering optional assistance”, Instructional Sci., vol. 30, issue 3, pp. 187-220, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Hiramanek, “Self directed learning and continuing medical education”, Aust. Fam. Physician., vol. 34, issue 10, pp. 879-880, October 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Information and Communication Technologies in Teacher Education [online]. [cited 2006 September] Available from: URL: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001295/129533e.pdf#search=%22Information%20and%20Communication%20Technology%20-%20advantage%20in%20educational%20process%22

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Falconer, “Organizational learning, tacit information, and e-learning: A review”, Learning Organization, vol. 13, issue 2, pp. 140-151, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. H. Uzunboylu, “International review”, Educ. Tech. Res., vol. 54, issue 2, pp. 201-209, April 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. G. Madariaga, A. T. Evans, W. Brobbey, M. Phillips, E. Lo, K. Rezai, D. N. Schwartz, G. M. Trenholme, and R. A. Weinstein, “Learning by doing: Developing fellows’ academic skills through collaborative research”, Med. Teach., vol. 28, issue 1, pp. 77-80, February 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. E. De Graaff, and A. Kolmos, “Characteristics of Problem-Based Learning”, Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 19, issue 5, pp. 657-662, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Newby, D. Stepich, J. Lehman, and J. Russel, “Instructional technology for teaching and learning”, Upper Saddle River, Merrill/Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Encheva, and S. Tumin, “Web-based assessment tests supporting learning”, Lect. Notes Comput. Sc., vol. 3807 LNCS, pp. 134-143, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. F. Farinha, E. Portela, C. Domingues, and L. Sousa, “Knowledge-based systems in civil engineering: Three case studies”, Adv. Eng. Softw., vol. 36, issue 11-12, pp. 729-739, November 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R. S. Day, “Challenges of biological realism and validation in simulation-based medical education”, Artif. Intell. Med., vol. 38, issue 1, pp. 47-66, September 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Fekete, J. Kay, J. Kingston, and K. Wimalaratne, “Supporting reflection in introductory Computer Science”, SIGCSE Bull., pp. 144-148, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Sibbald, “A student assessment of the Virtual Interactive Case Tool for Asynchronous Learning (VITAL) and other self-directed learning formats”, Am. J. Pharm. Educ., vol. 68, issue 1, pp. 1-7, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. I. Nascu, and L. Jäntschi, “Multiple Choice Examination System 1. Database Design and Implementation for General Chemistry”, LJS, issue 5, pp. 18-33, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. I. Nascu, and L. Jäntschi, “Multiple Choice Examination System 2. Online Quizzes for General Chemistry”, LEJPT, issue 5, pp. 26-36, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  19. L. Jäntschi, and S. D. Bolboaca, “Auto-calibrated Online Evaluation: Database Design and Implementation”, LEJPT, issue 8, pp. 178-191, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. D. Bolboaca, and L. Jäntschi, “Computer-Based Testing on Physical Chemistry Topic: A Case Study”, unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Binomial Distribution [online]. ©VLFS, 2005 [cited 2006 September]. Available from: URL: http://vl.academicdirect.org/applied_statistics/binomial_distribution/.

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. Toby, and R. J. Plano, “Testing, Testing: Good Teaching Is Difficult; So Is Meaningful Testing”, J. Chem. Educ., vol. 81, no.2, pp. 180-181, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J. J. Venkrbec, J. Kousal, R. Berger, and J. Stetina, “Education programmes in materials science and engineering”, Mat. Sci. Eng. A-Struct., vol. A199, issue 1, pp. 79-86, August 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. Jenkins, E. K. Goo, “Concept-based instruction and Personal Response Systems (PRS) as an assessment method for introductory materials science and engineering”, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, pp. 2133-2142, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

JÄNTSCHI, L., STOENOIU, C.E., BOLBOACMĂ, S.E. (2007). Undergraduate Students Assessment on Materials Chemistry Topic using an Auto-Calibrated Online System. In: Iskander, M. (eds) Innovations in E-learning, Instruction Technology, Assessment, and Engineering Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6262-9_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6262-9_38

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6261-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6262-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics