Skip to main content

Workplace learning forms an essential part of many degree programmes yet often it does not receive academic credit in the same way as for the taught elements of the course. We are involved in running science Sandwich degrees in which students are on work placement for one year. Until recently students received no academic credit for the year yet their learning was often at graduate level. The reason why academic credit was not given in the past was because of the diverse nature of the placements for each student and the geographical separation of the students from the home institution which made monitoring learning and assuring equivalence of assessment problematic. We have devised a novel pedagogic methodology to address assessment for the award of credit for placement learning but the necessary complexity of the problem needs an IT solution which we have produced, called Profile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Athanasou, J. and Lamprianou, I. (2002). Introduction to Assessment. A Teacher's Guide to Assessment. Sydney: Social Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banta, T., Lund, J., Black, K. and Oblander, F. (1996). Assessment in Practice: Putting Principles to Work on College Campuses. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, (2), 139-148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (1987). Developing critical thinkers: Challenging adults to explore alternative ways of thinking and acting. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., Bull, J. and Pendlebury, M. (1997). Assessing Learning in Higher Education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, S. and Gibbs, G. (1994). Course Design for Resource Based Learning. Oxford Centre for Staff Development. Oxford: Oxford Brookes University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, S., Westwood, J. and Percival, F. (2003). Postgraduate certificate in teaching and learning in higher education, Module 4; Independent Professional Study, Edinburgh: Educational Development, Napier University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, N. (1994). Experiential Learning for All. London: Cassell Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falchikov, N. (2005). Improving Assessment Through Student Involvement. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G. (1987). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Birmingham: FEU Birmingham Polytechnic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, I. and Mill, M. (1993). Using learning contracts to enhance the quality of work-based learning. In Shaw, M. and Roper, E. (eds.), Aspects of Educational and Training Technology, XXVI, Quality in education and training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1996). Contemporary paradigms of learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 44, (3), 158-173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioural Science, 28, 4-13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, D. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 145-165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, K. and Marsick, V. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: lessons in the art and science of systemic change, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wight, A. (1970). Participative education and the inevitable revolution. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 4, (4), 234-282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D. and Black, P. (1996). Meanings and Consequences: A Basis for Distinguishing Formative and Summative Functions of Assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 22, (5), 527-548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gomez, S., Lush, D., Layton, C., Cho, P., Tang, C., O'Toole, K. (2007). Examining Assessment in the Workplace. In: Frankland, S. (eds) Enhancing Teaching and Learning through Assessment. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6226-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics