Simultaneous measurements of the fluid and the solid phases in homogeneous turbulence: preliminary results at Reλ = 250

  • Michele Guala
  • Alexander Liberzon
  • Klaus Hoyer
  • Arkady Tsinober
  • Wolfgang Kinzelbach
Conference paper
Part of the ERCOFTAC Series book series (ERCO, volume 11)


Two-phase turbulent flows are of great interest for a number of most important and extremely diverse application such as combustion, sedimentation, fluidized beds, settling and resuspension of organic material and contaminants in lakes, ocean, waste water management, evolution of clouds, rain formation and dust storms (see for example Crowe et al., 1998, Gyr and Kinzelbach, 2003, Burton & Eaton 2005 and references therein). In a turbulent flow the interaction between the second phase and the carrier fluid is important since, for example the nonlinear processes that redistribute energy between the scale of the energy containing eddies and the scales associated with the field of velocity derivatives, are two-way coupled with the spatial distribution of the second phase. In the case of dilute suspensions of solid particles, the small scale processes of turbulence were observed to be modified due to the effects such as inertial response of particles to fluid acceleration, gravitational effects and preferential concentration of particles (see e.g. Ferrante & Elghobashi, 2003). In particular, in the flow regions where the dispersed solid phase tends to accumulate (i.e., clusters), the two way coupling effects may be enhanced, leading to strong modification of the local processes of self-amplification of velocity derivatives (see e.g. Tsinober, 2001).


Tracer Particle Settling Velocity Stokes Number Preferential Concentration Observation Volume 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Aliseda A., Cartellier A., Hainaux F and Lasheras J.C. (2002), Effect of preferential concentration on the settling velocity of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence J. Fluid Mech., 468, 77–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Bosse T. and Kleiser L. (2006), Small particles in homogeneous turbulence: Settling velocity enhancement in two way coupling, Phys. Fluids, 18, 027102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Armenio and Fiorotto (2001), The importance of the forces acting on particles in turbulent flows Phys. Fluids, 13(8), 2437–2440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Burton T.M. and Eaton J.K. (2005), Fully resolved simulations of particle-turbulence interaction J. Fluid Mech. Vol. 545, pp. 67–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Crowe C., Sommerfeld and Tsuji Y. (1998) Multiphase flow with droplets and particles, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Boston.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Eaton J.K. and Fessler J.R. (1994), preferential concentration of particles by turbulence. Int. J. Multiphase Flow (20), pp 169–209Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Fallon T. and Rogers C.B., (2002), Turbulence induced preferential concentration of solid particles in microgravity conditions Exp. Fluids, 33, 233–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Ferrante A. and Elgobashi S. (2003), On the physical mechanisms of two way coupling in particle laden isotropic turbulence, Phys. Fluids, 15(2), 315–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Gyr A. and Kinzelbach W. (2003) Sedimentation and sediment transport: at the crossroad of physics and engineering, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Kiger K.T. Pan C. (2002), Suspension and turbulence modification effects of solid particulates on a horizontal turbulent channel flow. Journal of Turbulence (3) 019Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Liberzon A., Guala M., Lüthi B., Kinzelbach W. and Tsinober A. (2005). Dilute polymers in turbulence. Phys. Fluids, 17, 031707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Lüthi B., Tsinober A. and Kinzelbach W., 2005, Lagrangian measurement of vorticity dynamics in turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech. Vol. 528, pp. 87–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Maxey M.R. and Riley J.J. (1983), Equation of motion for a small rigid sphere in a non uniform flow. Phys. Fluids, 26(4), 883–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Squires K.D. and Eaton J.K., (1991), Phys. Fluids, Preferential concentration of particles by turbulence. A 3(5), 1169–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Squires K.D. and Yamazaki H., (1995), Preferential concentration of marine particles in isotropic turbulence. Deep-Sea Research 42(11/12), 1989–2004.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Tsinober A. (2001) An informal introduction to turbulence, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Voth G.A. La Porta A., Crawford A.M. Alexander J. and Bodenshatz E. (2002), Fully resolved simulations of particle-turbulence interaction J. Fluid Mech. Vol. 469, pp. 121–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Yang T.S. and Shy S.S. (2005), The settling velocity of heavy particles in an aqueous near-isotropic turbulence Phys. Fluids, 15(4), 860–880.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michele Guala
    • 1
  • Alexander Liberzon
    • 1
    • 2
  • Klaus Hoyer
    • 1
  • Arkady Tsinober
    • 3
  • Wolfgang Kinzelbach
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Environmental Engineering, ETH HonggerbergZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Fluid Mechanics and Heat TransferTel Aviv UniversityIsrael
  3. 3.Department of AeronauticsImperial CollegeLondonGreat Britain

Personalised recommendations