Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ahlqvist, T. “From information society to biosociety? On societalwaves, developing key technologies, and new professions.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 75 (2005),501–519.
Árnason, V. “Coding and Consent: Moral Challenges of theDatabase Project in Iceland”. Bioethics 18 (2004), 27–49.
Birch, A. The Concepts andTheories of Modern Democracy. London Routledge, 2001.
Braun, K. “Not Just Experts: The Public Debate aboutReprogenetics in Germany”. Hastings Center Report(May–June 2005), 42–49.
Buchannan, A., Brock, D., Daniels, N., & Wikler, D. FromChance to Choice: Genetics and Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Cahill, L. S. “Biotech & Justice: Catching Up with the RealWorld Order”. Hastings Center Report (September–October2003), 34–44.
Chadwick, R. “Informed consent and genetic research”. In Doyal,L., & Tobias, J. (eds.) Informed Consent in MedicalResearch. London: BMJ Books, 2001.
Dahl, R. A. Democracy and its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.
Dahl, R. A. On Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press,2000.
Davis, A. “What silence knows – planning, public participationand environmental values”. Environmental Values 10 (2001),77–102.
Directive 2001/18/EC. In www-pageshttp://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2001/l_106/ l_10620010417en00010038.pdf
Dodds, S., & Thomson, C. “Bioethics and democracy: Competingroles of national bioethics organisations”. Bioethics 20(2006), 326–338.
European Federation of Biotechnology. “Task Group on PublicPerceptions”. Report of the Focus Workshops: Who shouldcommunicate with public and how? In www-pages:http://files.efbpublic.org/downloads/EU_FW_REPORT_1.pdf,2003.
Gaskell, G. et al. Europeans and Biotechnology in 2005: Patterns andTrends: Eurobarometer 64.3. In www-pages:http://www.ec.europa.eu/research/press/2006/pdf/pr1906_eb_64_3_final_report-may2006_en.pdf, 2006.
Harrison, R. Democracy. Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2001.
Karlsson, M. “Ethics of sustainable development – A study ofSwedish regulations for genetically modified organisms”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (2003), 51–62.
Klombenhouwer, T., & van den Belt, H. “Regulating functionalfoods in the European union: Informed choice versus consumerprotection?”. Journal of Agricultural and EnvironmentalEthics 16 (2003), 545–556.
Kuusi, O. Geenitieto kuuluu kaikille. Helsinki, Edita 2004.
Launis, V. Geeniteknologia, arvot ja vastuu. Helsinki:Gaudeamus, 2003.
Mannermaa, M. Biosociety and Human Being: A report to the NationalTechnology Agency of Finland (Tekes). www-sivuilla:http://onet.tehonetti.fi/mannermaa_en/onet/ articlesandlinks/?group=00000011&mag_nr=3,2006(2003).
Marris, C., Wynne, B., Simmons, P., & Weldon, S. PublicPerceptions of Agricultural Biotechnologies in Europe: FinalReport of the PABE Research Project. 2001.
Moroso, M. Perspectives on Public Engagement. The Newsletterof the ESRC Genomics Network 2006, no. 4, p. 15.
OECD. International Futures Programme. The Bioeconomy to 2030:Designing a Policy Agenda. In www-pages:http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/7/51/37504590.pdf, 2006.
O’Neill, O. Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Port Chester,NY: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Paula, L., & Birrer, F. “Including public perspectives inindustrial biotechnology and the biobased economy”. Journalof Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 198 (2006), 253–267.
Petit, P. “Republican freedom and contestatory democratization.”In Shapiro, I., & Hacker-Cordón C. (eds.) Democracy’sValue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Przeworsky, A. “Minimalist conception of democracy: a defence”.In Shapiro, I., & Hacker-Cordón C. (eds.) Democracy’sValue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Räikkä, J., & Rossi, K. Geenit ja etiikka:kysymyksiä uuden geeniteknologian arvoista. Helsinki: WSOY,2002.
Röcklinsberg, H. “Consent and consensus in policies relatedto food – five core values”. Journal of Agricultural andEnvironmental Ethics 19 (2006), 285–299.
Resnik, D. “Setting biomedical research priorities: Justice,science, and public participation”. Kennedy Institute ofEthics Journal 11 (2001), 181–204.
Rydin, Y. Public Participation: Different Rationales; DifferentStrategies. In www-pageswww.environment.fi/download.asp?contentid=60431&lan=en,2006.
Setälä, M. Demokratian arvo: Teoriat,käytännöt ja mahdollisuudet. Helsinki: Gaudeamus,2003.
Sharpe, V. A. “Science, bioethics, and the public interest: Onthe need for transparency”. Hastings Center Report(May–June 2002), 23–26.
Sterckx, S., & Macmillan, T. “Taking citizens seriously”.Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (2006),219–223.
Tamminen, T. “Kenen bioyhteiskunta?” Futura 4 (2004),99–106.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Siipi, H. (2008). The Prerequisites for Genetic Democracy. In: Launis, V., Räikkä, J. (eds) Genetic Democracy. International Library Of Ethics, Law, And The New Medicine, vol 37. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6212-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6212-4_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6205-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6212-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)