Moral Constraints on Permissible Genetic Design
Part of the International Library Of Ethics, Law, And The New Medicine book series (LIME, volume 37)
KeywordsGeneral Objection Model World Genetic Design Genetic Endowment Prospective Parent
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Dan Brock: “Cloning Human Beings: An Assessment of the Ethical Issues Pro and Con” in Martha Nussbaum and Cass Sunstein, eds.: Clones and Clones: Facts and Fantasies about Human Cloning (New York: Norton 1998), 141–164.Google Scholar
- Dan Brock: “Enhancements of Human Function: Some Distinctions for Policymakers” in Erik Parens, ed.: Enhancing Human Traits: Ethical and Social Implications (Washington: Georgetown University Press 1998), 148–69.Google Scholar
- Allen Buchanan, Dan Brock, Norman Daniels, and Daniel Wikler: From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2000).Google Scholar
- Carl Elliot: Better than Well: American Medicine Meets the American Dream (New York: Norton 2003).Google Scholar
- Michael Sandel: “The Case Against Perfection” The Atlantic Monthly 293:3 (April 2004): 51–62.Google Scholar
- Michael H. Shapiro: “The Technology of Perfection: Performance Enhancement and the Control of Attributes” Southern California Law Journal 65:1 (1991): 11–113.Google Scholar
- Ludwig Siep: “Enhancement, Cloning, and Human Nature” in Christian Nimtz and Ansgar Beckermann, eds.: Philosophie und/als Wissenschaft. Philosophy – Science – Scientific Philosophy (Paderborn: Mentis 2005), 191–203.Google Scholar
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008