Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Sustainability, Economics, and Natural Resources ((SENR,volume 3))

  • 624 Accesses

An intergenerational allocation is defined to be unjust if there is a feasible allocation with more total consumption and less relative inequality. Unjust allocations are characterized in technologies satisfying certain regularity conditions. After ruling out unjust allocations, the consequences of letting generations choose according to a standard form of altruistic preferences are explored into particular classes of technologies. A connection between excluding unjust allocations and maximizing the welfare of the worst off generation is established in these technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Asheim, G.B. (1988), Rawlsian intergenerational justice as a Markov-perfect equilibrium in a resource technology, Review of Economic Studies 55, 469–483 (Chap. 6 of the present volume)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beals, R. and Koopmans, T.C. (1969), Maximizing stationary utility in a constant technology, SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics 17, 1001–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birchenhall, C.R. and Grout, P. (1979), On equal plans with an infinite horizon, Journal of Economic Theory 21, 249–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, C. and Donaldson, D. (1984), Utility vs. equity: Some plausible quasi-orderings, Journal of Public Economics 7, 365–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, G. (1978), Some notes on time inconsistency and RawlsÅ  maximin criterion, Review of Economic Studies 45, 97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cass, D. and Mitra, T. (1991), Indefinitely sustained consumption despite exhaustible natural resources, Economic Theory 1, 119–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, H. (1920), The measurement of the inequality of incomes, Economic Journal 30, 348–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P.S. and Heal, G.M. (1974), The optimal depletion of exhaustible resources, Review of Economic Studies (Symposium), 3-28

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P.S. and Heal, G.M. (1979), Economic Theory and Exhaustible Resources. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P.S., Sen, A. and Starrett, D. (1973), Notes on the measurement of inequality, Journal of Economic Theory 6, 180–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S. and Mitra, T. (1983), Intergenerational equity and efficient allocation of exhaustible Resources, International Economic Review 24, 133–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L.G. (1986a), Intergenerational consumption rules: An axiomatization of utilitarianism and egalitarianism, Journal of Economic Theory 38, 280–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L.G. (1986b), Intergenerational preference orderings, Social Choice and Welfare 3, 151–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, J. and Page, T. (1978), On the foundation of intertemporal choice, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 60, 269–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J.C. (1955), Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility, Journal of Political Economy 63, 309–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T.C. (1967), Intertemporal distribution and optima1 aggregate economic growth, in Ten Economic Studies in the Tradition of Irving Fisher. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishan, E. (1977), Economic criteria for intergenerational comparisons, Futures 9, 383–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, T. (1977), Conservation and Economic Effiency. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971), Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1988), The priority of right and ideas of the good, Public Affairs 17, 251–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, D. (1987), Nonpaternalistic intergenerational altruism, Journal of Economic Theory 41, 112–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. (1973), On Economic Inequality. Oxford University Press, London/New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. (1977), On weights and measures: Informational constraints in social welfare analysis, Econometrica 45, 1539–1572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R.M. (1974), Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources, Review of Economic Studies (Symposium), 29-45

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L.G. (1980), Equity among generations, Econometrica 48, 1251–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickrey, W. (1945), Measuring marginal utility by reactions to risk, Econometrica 13, 319–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Weizsäcker, C.C. (1965), Existence of optimal program of accumulation for an infinite time horizon, Review of Economic Studies 32, 85–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED (The World Commission on Environment and Development) (1987), Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2007). Unjust Intergenerational Allocations. In: Justifying, Characterizing and Indicating Sustainability. Sustainability, Economics, and Natural Resources, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6200-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics