Skip to main content

The Malleability of Undiscounted Utilitarianism as a Criterion of Intergenerational Justice

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Sustainability, Economics, and Natural Resources ((SENR,volume 3))

Discounting future utilities is often justified by the ethically motivated objective to protect earlier generations from the excessive saving that seems to be implied by undiscounted utilitarianism in productive economies. In this paper we question this justification of discounting by showing that undiscounted utilitarianism has sufficient malleability within important classes of technologies: Any efficient and nondecreasing allocation can be the unique optimum according to an undiscounted utilitarian criterion for some choice of utility function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow, K.J. (1999), Discounting, morality, and gaming, in P.R. Portney and J.P. Weyant, (eds.), Discounting and Intergenerational Equity. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, G.B., Buchholz, W. and Tungodden, B. (2001), Justifying sustainability, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41, 252U"–268. (Chapter 3 of the present volume.)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. (1970), On the measurement of inequality, Journal of Economic Theory 2, 244–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cass, D. and Mitra, T. (1991), Indefinitely sustained consumption despite exhaustible natural resources, Economic Theory 1, 119–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, S. (1969), Capital and Development Planning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Collard, D. (1994), Inequality aversion, resource depletion and sustainability. Economics Letters 45, 513–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowell, D. (2000), Measurement of inequality, in A.B. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon, (eds.), Handbook of Income Distribution, vol. I. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P.S. and Heal, G.M. (1974), The optimal depletion of exhaustible resources, Review of Economic Studies (Symposium), 3-28

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P.S. and Heal, G.M. (1979), Economic Theory and Exhaustible Resources. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P.S. and Mäler, K.G. (1995), Poverty, institutions, and the environmental resource-base, in J. Behrman, and T.N. Srinavasan, (eds.), Handbook of Development Economics, vol. III. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S. and Mitra, T. (1983), Intergenerational equity and efficient allocation of exhaustible resources, International Economic Review 24, 133–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P. (1965), The evaluation of infinite utility streams, Econometrica 33, 170–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleurbaey, M. and Michel, P. (1994), Optimal growth and transfers between generations, Recherches Economiques de Louvain 60, 281–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleurbaey, M. and Michel, P. (1999), Quelques réflexions sur la croissance optimale, Revue Économique 50, 715–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleurbaey, M. and Michel, P. (2001), Transfer principles and inequality aversion, with an application to optimal growth, Mathematical Social Sciences 42, 1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J.C. (1953), Cardinal utility in welfare economics and in the theory of risk-taking, Journal of Political Economy 61, 434–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heal, G.M. (1998), Valuing the Future: Economic Theory and Sustainability. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, S. (1994), Duality between discounted and undiscounted models of economic growth, Economics Letters 44, 403–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T.C. (1960), Stationary ordinal utility and impatience, Econometrica 28, 287–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D. and Porteus, E.L. (1979), Temporal von Neumann-Morgenstern and induced preferences, Journal of Economic Theory 20, 81–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauwers, L. (1997), Continuity and equity with infinite horizons, Social Choice and Welfare 14, 345–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees, J.A. (1967), Optimal growth when technology is changing, Review of Economic Studies 34, 95–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, T. (1978), Efficient growth with exhaustible resources in a neoclassical model, Journal of Economic Theory 17, 114–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, T. (1977), Conservation and Economic Efficiency. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A.C. (1932), The Economics of Welfare. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F.P. (1928), A mathematical theory of saving, Economic Journal 38, 543–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971), Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. (1995), Intergenerational discounting, Energy Economics 23, 395–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidgwick, H. (1907), The Methods of Ethics. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R.M. (1974), Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. Review of Economic Studies (Symposium), 29-45

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L.G. (1980), Equity among generations, Econometrica 48, 1251–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szpilrajn, E. (1930), Sur l’extension de l’ordre partial, Fundamenta Mathematicae 16, 386–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M.L. (1998), Why the far-distant future should be discounted at the lowest possible rate, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36, 201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M.L. (2001), Gamma discounting, American Economic Review 91, 260–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Asheim, G.B., Buchholz, W. (2007). The Malleability of Undiscounted Utilitarianism as a Criterion of Intergenerational Justice. In: Justifying, Characterizing and Indicating Sustainability. Sustainability, Economics, and Natural Resources, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6200-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics