Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Sustainability, Economics, and Natural Resources ((SENR,volume 3))

  • 644 Accesses

When evaluating long-term policies, economists usually suggest to maximize the sum of discounted utilities. On the one hand, discounted utilitarianism was given a solid axiomatic foundation by Koopmans (Econometrica, 1960). On the other hand, this criterion has questionable implications when applied to economic models with resource constraints. This raises the question: What ethical conditions for intergenerational distribution should and can be imposed? I use my discussion of such conditions to illuminate the conflict between equity and efficiency that has been a central theme in the axiomatic literature on intergenerational justice. Moreover, a guide to some recent contributions is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Asheim, G.B., Buchholz, W., Hartwick, J.M., Mitra, T., and Withagen, C. (2007), Constant savings rates and quasi-arithmetic population growth under exhaustible resource constraints, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53, 213–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, G.B., Buchholz, W., and Tungodden, B. (2001), Justifying sustainability, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41, 252–268 (Chap. 3 of the present volume)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, G.B. and Tungodden, B. (2004a), Resolving distributional conflicts between generations, Economic Theory 24, 221–230 (Chap. 4 of the present volume)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, G.B. and Tungodden, B. (2004b), Do Koopmans’ postulates lead to discounted utilitarianism? Discussion paper 32/04, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.B. (2001), The strange disappearance of welfare economics, Kyklos 54, 193–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Atsumi, H. (1965), Neoclassical growth and the efficient program of capital accumulation, Review of Economic Studies 32, 127–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K. and Mitra, T. (2003), Aggregating infinite utility streams with intergenerational equity: the impossibility of being Paretian, Econometrica 32, 1557–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K. and Mitra, T. (2007), Utilitarianism for infinite utility streams: A new welfare criterion and its axiomatic characterization, Journal of Economic Theory, 133, 350–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossert, W., Sprumont, Y., and Suzumura, K. (2006), Ordering infinite utility streams, Journal of Economic Theory, forthcoming, doi:10.1016/j.jet.2006.03.005

    Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky, G. (1996), An axiomatic approach to sustainable development, Social Choice and Welfare 13, 231–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P.S. and Heal, G.M. (1974), The optimal depletion of exhaustible resources, Review of Economic Studies (Symposium), 3-28

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P.S. and Heal, G.M. (1979), Economic Theory and Exhaustible Resources. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P. (1965), The evaluation of infinite utility streams, Econometrica 33, 170–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hari, C., Shinotsuka, T., Suzumura, K. and Xu, Y. (2005), On the possibility of continuous, Paretian, and egalitarian evaluation of infinite utility streams. Mimeo, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwick, J.M. (1977), Intergenerational equity and investing rents from exhaustible resources, American Economic Review 66, 972–974

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T.C. (1960), Stationary ordinal utility and impatience, Econometrica 28, 287–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F.P. (1928), A mathematical theory of saving, Economic Journal 38, 543–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971), Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, Harvard, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. (1970), Collective Choice and Social Welfare. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R.M. (1974), Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. Review of Economic Studies (Symposium), 29-45

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P. (1966), Some formal models of grading principles, Synthese 6, 284–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Weizsäcker, C.C. (1965), Existence of optimal program of accumulation for an infinite time horizon, Review of Economic Studies 32, 85–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2007). Intergenerational Ethics Under Resource Constraints. In: Justifying, Characterizing and Indicating Sustainability. Sustainability, Economics, and Natural Resources, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6200-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics