Advertisement

Behavioral and Genetic Interactions Between Escaped Farm Salmon and Wild Atlantic Salmon

  • Kjetil Hindar
  • Ian A. Fleming
Part of the Methods and Technologies in Fish Biology and Fisheries book series (REME, volume 6)

The production of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) dwarfs the wild salmon fishery by two orders of magnitude. Throughout the North Atlantic region, large numbers of aquacultured (farm) fish escape and invade rivers that contain native salmon. This causes considerable concern, because interactions between escaped farm fish and native fish can cause a decline in the fitness and productivity of the native stock. Norwegian farm salmon originate from salmon collections taken from wild populations in the early 1970s. They have been under artificial selection for growth rate, age at maturity, disease resistance, and flesh quality. Farm strains have changed genetically relative to the original populations from which they were taken and they have lost allelic variation compared to wild populations. Escaped farm salmon can spawn successfully in the wild, but their breeding performance can be inferior to that of wild salmon. Farm offspring outgrow those of wild origin, both under artificial and natural conditions. Farm juveniles also differ in aggressive behavior and dominance relative to wild juveniles, and they appear to suffer higher mortality during early life stages, possibly due to their lower response to predation risk. Farm-X-wild offspring are behaviorally intermediate between farm and wild juveniles, and show superior growth compared to wild juveniles. In a whole-river experiment, we showed that the lifetime reproductive success of farm salmon was 16% that of the native salmon. Differential selection against farm-salmon genotypes occurred during breeding and early survival but was similar to that of wild salmon thereafter, despite significant ecological differences between the two groups. The overall productivity of the population, however, appeared depressed. Our findings suggest that gene flow from escaped farm fish to native fish will lead to genetic and behavioral changes in wild populations in the direction of domesticated salmon. Moreover, wild populations may suffer depressed productivity caused by ecological interactions with escaped farm salmon and their offspring. These findings call into question the long-term viability of many salmon populations.

Keywords

Atlantic Salmon Wild Population Salmon Population Salmo Salar Lifetime Reproductive Success 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barton, N.H. 1992. On the spread of new gene combinations in the third phase of Wright's shifting balance theory. Evolution 46: 551–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bulmer, M.G. 1980. The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics. Clarendon Press, Oxford, England. 255 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Cross, T.F., and R.D. Ward. 1980. Protein variation and duplicate loci in the Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. Genetical Research 36: 147–165.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Einum, S., and I.A. Fleming. 1997. Genetic divergence and interactions in the wild among native, farmed and hybrid Atlantic salmon. Journal of Fish Biology 50: 634–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fiske, P., and R.A. Lund. 1999. Escapees of reared salmon in coastal and riverine fisheries in the period 1989–1998. NINA Oppdragsmelding 603: 1-23 (in Norwegian with an English abstract).Google Scholar
  6. Fleming, I.A., and S. Einum. 1997. Experimental tests of genetic divergence of farmed from wild Atlantic salmon due to domestication. ICES Journal of Marine Science 54: 1051–1063.Google Scholar
  7. Fleming, I.A., B. Jonsson, M.R. Gross, and A. Lamberg. 1996. An experimental study of the reproductive behaviour and success of farmed and wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 893–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fleming, I.A., K. Hindar, I.B. Mjølnerød, B. Jonsson, T. Balstad, and A. Lamberg. 2000. Lifetime success and interactions of farm salmon invading a native population. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267: 1517–1523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fleming, I.A., T. Agustsson, B. Finstad, J.I. Johnsson, and B.Th. Björnsson. 2002. Effects of domestication on growth physiology and endocrinology of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59: 1323–1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gibson, R.J. 1993. The Atlantic salmon in fresh water: spawning, rearing and production. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 3: 39–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gjedrem, T., H.M. Gjøen, and B. Gjerde. 1991. Genetic origin of Norwegian farmed salmon. Aquaculture 98: 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hedrick, P.W. 1983. Genetics of Populations. Science Books International, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 629 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Hindar, K., and B. Jonsson. 1995. Impacts of aquaculture and hatcheries on wild fish. In: D.P. Philipp, J.M. Epifanio, J.E. Marsden, and J.E. Claussen (eds.), Protection of Aquatic Biodiversity. Proceedings of the World Fisheries Congress, Theme 3. Oxford and IBH Publishing, New Delhi, India. Pp. 70–87.Google Scholar
  14. Hindar, K., N. Ryman, and F. Utter. 1991. Genetic effects of cultured fish on natural fish populations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48: 945–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnsson, J.I., J. Höjesjö, and I.A. Fleming. 2001. Behavioural and heart rate response to predation risk in wild and domesticated Atlantic salmon. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58: 788–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jonsson, N., B. Jonsson, and L.P. Hansen. 1998. The relative role of density-dependent and density-independent survival in the life cycle of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. Journal of Animal Ecology 67: 751–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kellogg, K.A. 1999. Salmon on the edge. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 45–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McGinnity, P., C. Stone, J.B. Taggart, D. Cooke, D. Cotter, R. Hynes, C. McCamley, T. Cross, and A. Ferguson. 1997. Genetic impact of escaped farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) on native populations: use of DNA profiling to assess freshwater performance of wild, farmed, and hybrid progeny in a natural river environment. ICES Journal of Marine Science 54: 998–1008.Google Scholar
  19. Mjølnerød, I.B., U.H. Refseth, E. Karlsen, T. Balstad, K.S. Jakobsen, and K. Hindar. 1997. Genetic differences between two wild and one farmed population of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) revealed by three classes of genetic markers. Hereditas 127: 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nielsen, E.E., M.M. Hansen, and V. Loeschcke. 1999. Genetic structure of European populations of Salmo salar L. (Atlantic salmon) inferred from mitochondrial DNA. Heredity 77: 351–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nielsen, E.E., M.M. Hansen, and V. Loeschcke. 1999. Genetic variation in time and space: microsatellite analysis of extinct and extant populations of Atlantic salmon. Evolution 53: 261–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nilsson, J. et al. 2001. Matrilinear phylogeography of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) in Europe and postglacial colonization of the Baltic Sea. Molecular Ecology 10: 89–102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Norris, A.T., D.G. Bradley, and E.P. Cunningham. 1999. Microsatellite genetic variation between and within farmed and wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) populations. Aquaculture 180: 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. O'Flynn, F.M., S.A. McGeachy, G.W. Friars, T.J. Benfey, and J.K. Bailey. 1997. Comparisons of cultured triploid and diploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). ICES Journal of Marine Science 54: 1160–1165.Google Scholar
  25. Ryman, N., F. Utter, and K. Hindar. 1995. Introgression, supportive breeding, and genetic conservation. In: J.D. Ballou, M. Gilpin, and T.J. Foose (eds.), Population Management for Survival and Recovery. Analytical Methods and Strategies in Small Population Conservation. Columbia University Press, New York City, New York, USA. Pp. 341–365.Google Scholar
  26. Ståhl, G. 1987. Genetic population structure of Atlantic salmon. In: N. Ryman, and F. Utter (eds.), Population Genetics and Fishery Management. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington, USA. Pp. 121–140.Google Scholar
  27. Taylor, E.B. 1991. A review of local adaptation in Salmonidae, with particular reference to Pacific and Atlantic salmon. Aquaculture 98: 185–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Verspoor, E. 1997. Genetic diversity among Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) populations. ICES Journal of Marine Science 54: 965–973.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kjetil Hindar
    • 1
  • Ian A. Fleming
    • 2
  1. 1.Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA)Norway
  2. 2.Ocean Sciences CentreMemorial University of NewfoundlandSt. John'sCanada

Personalised recommendations