Skip to main content

Global demand for fishwill probably double in the next 30–50 years. Towhat extent can aquaculture increase and sustain its contributions toworld fish supply without unacceptable environmental impacts? Indicators towards answering this question are suggested here. These are as follows: (1) biological indicators—potential for domestication, with genetic enhancement; trophic level; feed and energy conversion efficiency; (2) ecological indicators—ecological footprint; emissions; escapees and feral populations; (3) intersectoral indicators—sharing water (e.g., with agriculture, fisheries, forestry, water supply, waste treatment); diversity; cycling; stability; and capacity. Back-calculation of FAO fisheries statistics yielded a dataset for aquaculture production from 1950 to 1997. This dataset, and reviews of literature on the sustainability of world food production, suggest that expansion of aquaculture will not result in sustainable and environmentally acceptable systems unless such indicators are used by policymakers and developers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abramovitz, J.N. 1996. Imperiled Waters, Impoverished Future. The Decline of Freshwater Ecosystems. Worldwatch Paper Number 128. Worldwatch Institute, Washington D.C., USA. 80 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackefors, H., and M. Enell. 1994. The release of nutrients and organic matter from aquaculture systems in Nordic countries. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 10: 225–241.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barg, U.C. 1992. Guidelines for the Promotion of Environmental Management of Coastal Aquaculture Development. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 328. United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome, Italy. 122 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barg, U.C., D.M. Bartley, A.G.J. Tacon, and R.L. Welcomme. 1997. Aquaculture and its environment: a case for collaborationD.A. Hancock, A. Grant, D.C. Smith, and J.P. Beumer (eds.), Developing and Sustaining World Fisheries: the State of Science and Management: 2nd World Fisheries Congress Proceedings. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia. Pp. 462–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartone, C.R. 1991. International perspectives on water resources management and wastewater reuse—appropriate technologies. Water Science and Technology 23: 2039–2047.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, B. 1997. Sustainability Assessment: a Review of Values, Concepts and Methodological Approaches. Issues in Agriculture, Number 10. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, Washington D.C., USA. 63 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertollo, P. 1998. Assessing ecosystem health in governed landscapes: a framework for developing core indicators. Ecosystem Health 4: 32–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Born, A.F., M.C.J. Verdegem, and E.A. Huisman. 1994. Macro-economic factors influencing world aquaculture production. Aquaculture and Fisheries Management 25: 519–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, C.E. 1999. Aquaculture sustainability and environmental issues. World Aquaculture 30: 10–13, 71–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, C.E. 2000. Water use in aquaculture. Global Aquaculture Advocate 3: 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozynski, C.C. 1998. Growth, Reproduction and Behavior of Control and Selected Strains of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). M.S. Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 109 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, G.W. 1993. Aquaculture trends and feed projections. World Aquaculture 24: 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R.R. et al. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253–260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dalsgaard, J.P.T., C. Lightfoot, and V. Christensen. 1995. Towards quantification of ecological sustainability in farming systems analysis. Ecological Engineering 4: 181–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dazhong, W., and D. Pimentel. 1990. Energy flow in agroecosystems of Northeast ChinaS.R. Gliessman (ed.), Agroecology, Researching the Ecological Basis for Sustainable Agriculture. Springer Verlag, New York City, New York, USA. Pp. 322–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. 1992. Reuse of Human Wastes in Aquaculture: a Technical Review. The World Bank, Washington D.C., USA. 350 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. 1998. A systems approach for the promotion of integrated aquaculture. Aquaculture Economics and Management 2: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 1995. Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries. FAO, Rome, Italy. 41 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. 1997a. Review of the State of World Aquaculture. FAO Fisheries Circular Number 886, Revision 1. FAO, Rome, Italy. 163 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. 1997b. Aquaculture Development. FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries, Number 5. FAO, Rome, Italy. 40 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. 1998. Fishstat Plus. FAO, Rome, Italy. Electronic Publication. Website: http://www.fao.org/fi/statist/FISOFT/FISHPLUS.asp

  • Ferguson, A.R.B. 1999. The essence of ecological footprints. Ecological Economics 31: 318–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., and N. Kautsky, 1992. Aquaculture with its environment: prospects for sustainability. Ocean and Coastal Management 17: 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., N. Kautsky, H. Berg, A. Jansson, and M. Troell. 1998. The ecological footprint concept for sustainable seafood production: a review. Ecological Applications 8, Supplement 1998: S63–S71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, J. 1999. Aquaculture chickens, salmon—a case study. World Aquaculture 39: 33–40, 69–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froese, R., and D. Pauly (eds.). 1999. FishBase 99: Concepts, Design and Data Sources. International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management (ICLARM), Manila, Philippines, 324 pp. and 2 CD-ROMs. Electronic publication. Website: http://www.fishbase.org

  • Gjedrem, T. 1998. Selective breeding in aquaculture. Infofish International 3: 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, P.H. (ed.). 1993. Water in Crisis: a Guide to the World's Freshwater Resources. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. 473 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodland, R. 1997. Environmental sustainability in agriculture: diet matters. Ecological Economics 23: 189–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaushik, S.J. 1998. Nutritional bioenergetics and estimation of waste production in non-salmonids. Aquatic Living Resources 11: 211–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiley-Worthington, M. 1998. Integrating conservation and agriculture production: a case study in the United Kingdom. Ecosystem Health 4: 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinne, O. 1986. Realism in aquaculture—the view of an ecologistM. Bilio, H. Rosenthal, and C.J. Sinderman (eds.), Realism in Aquaculture: Achievements, Constraints, Perspectives. European Aquaculture Society, Bredene, Belgium. Pp. 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J., M. van Vliet, and S. Jentoft (eds.). 1999. Creative Governance: Opportunities for Fisheries in Europe. Ashgate Publishers, Aldershot, England. 287 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. (ed.). 2000. Seafood Lover's Almanac. National Audobon Society, Islip, New York, USA. 120 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot, C., M.A.P. Bimbao, J.P.T. Dalsgaard, and R.S.V. Pullin. 1993. Aquaculture and sustainability through integrated resources management. Outlook on Agriculture 22: 143–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, D.E., A.L. Hamilton, and B. Harvey. 1997. Global freshwater biodiversity: striving for the integrity of freshwater ecosystems. Seawind 11: 1–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • NATS (Norwegian Academy of Technological Sciences). 1998. Holmenkollen Guidelines for Sustainable Aquaculture, 1998. NATS, Oslo, Norway. 21 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, R.L. et al. 2000. Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 405: 1017–1024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • New, M.B. 1998a. Responsible aquaculture and the new millenium. EC Cooperation Bulletin 11: 16–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • New, M.B. 1998b. Global aquaculture: current trends and challenges for the 21st Century. Anals do Aquicultura Brasil (Proceedings of Aquicultura Brasil 98, 2–6 November 1998, Recife, Brasil.) 1:9–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noakes, D.L.G., and E.K. Balon. 1982. Life histories of tilapias: an evolutionary perspectiveR.S.V. Pullin, and R.H. Lowe-McConnell (eds.), The Biology and Culture of Tilapias. ICLARM Conference Proceedings 7: 61–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oláh, J., and F. Pékar. 1995. Transfer of energy and nitrogen in fish farming integrated ecosystemsJ.-J. Symoens, and J.-C. Micha (eds.), The Management of Integrated Freshwater Agropiscicultural Ecosystems in Tropical Areas. Proceedings of an International Seminar Brussels, 16–19 May, 1994. Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Co-operation (CTA), Wageningen, Netherlands, and Belgian Royal Academy of Overseas Sciences (ARSOM), Brussels, Belgium. Pp. 17–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Páez-Osuna, F., S.R. Guerrero-Galván, and A.C. Ruiz-Fernandez. 1998. The environmental impact of shrimp aquaculture and the coastal pollution of Mexico. Marine Pollution Bulletin 36: 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, J.H., and I.D. Hodge. 1993. Environmental standards versus structural changes as sustainability alternatives: an empirical evaluation of nitrate pollution control. Environment and Planning A 25: 1759–1772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parris, K. 1995. OECD Agri-environmental Indicators: Preliminary Work. Paper presented at the Resource Policy Consortium Symposium, “Developing Indicators for Environmental Sustainability: the Nuts and Bolts,” 12–13 June, 1995, Washington D.C. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France. 20 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, D. 1994. On the sex of fish and the gender of scientists. Essays in Fisheries Science, Series No.14. Chapman and Hall Fish and Fisheries, London, England. Pp. 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, D. 1995. Anecdotes and the shifting baseline syndrome of fisheries. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10: 430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, D., and C. Lightfoot. 1992. A new approach for analyzing and comparing coastal resource systems. Naga, the ICLARM Quarterly 15: 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, D., and V. Christensen. 1995. Primary production required to sustain global fisheries. Nature 374: 255–257.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, D., V. Christensen, J. Dalsgaard, R. Froese, and F. TorresJr, . 1998. Fishing down marine food webs. Science 279: 860–869.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, F. 1997. Thirsty meals that suck the world dry. New Scientist, February 1, 1997: 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillay, T.V.R. 1997. Aquaculture development and the concept of sustainabilityK.P.P. Nambiar, and T. Singh (eds.), Sustainable Aquaculture. Infofish, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Pp. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prein, M. 1996. Wastewater-fed aquaculture in Germany: a summary. Environmental Research Forum 5–6: 155–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullin, R.S.V. 1993. Discussion and recommendations on aquaculture and the environment in developing countriesR.S.V. Pullin, H. Rosenthal, and J.L. Maclean (eds.), Environment and Aquaculture in Developing Countries. ICLARM Conference Proceedings 3: 312–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullin, R.S.V., H. Rosenthal, and J.L. Maclean (eds.). 1993. Environment and Aquaculture in Developing Countries. ICLARM Conference Proceedings 31: 1–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullin, R.S.V., M.L. Palomares, C.M.V. Casal, M.M. Dey, and D. Pauly. 1997. Environmental impacts of tilapiasK. Fitzsimmons (ed.), Tilapia Aquaculture. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Tilapia in Aquaculture, Volume 2. Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service, Ithaca, New York, USA. Pp. 554–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, H., V. Hilge, and A. Kamstra (eds.). 1993. Workshop on Fish Farm Effluents and Their Control in EC Countries. Institute for Marine Science, Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel, Kiel, Federal Republic of Germany. 205 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slocombe, D.S. 1993. Implementing ecosystem-based management. BioScience 43: 612–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sproul, J.T. 1997. Sustainable aquaculture certification: a questionnaire based on the FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible FisheriesK.P.P. Nambiar, and T. Singh (eds.), Sustainable Aquaculture. Infofish, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Pp. 154–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, M., and U.J. Blumental. 1990. Human Waste Use in Agriculture and Aquaculture. Utilization, Practices and Health Perspectives, Executive Summary. International Reference Center for Waste Disposal Report 09/90, Duebendorf, Switzerland. 52 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • TAC/CGIAR (Technical Advisory Committee, Consultative Group on International Agriculture Research). 1989. Sustainable Agricultural Production: Implications for International Agricultural Research. FAO Research and Technology Paper Number 4. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. 131 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tacon, A.G.J. 1995. Aquaculture feeds and feeding in the next millenium: major challenges and issues. FAO Aquaculture Newsletter 10: 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tacon, A.G.J. 1997. Feeding tomorrow's fish: the Asian perspectiveK.P.P. Nambiar, and T. Singh (eds.), Sustainable Aquaculture. Infofish, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Pp. 20–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tacon, A.G.J. 1998. Aquaculture. Issue: dependence on agricultural and fishery resources. Infofish International 2/1998:19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, G.E. 1988. Codes of Practice and Manual of Procedures for Consideration of Introductions and Transfers of Marine and Freshwater Organisms. FAO, EIFAC/CECPI, Occasional Paper 23. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy. 44 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Bergh, J.C.J.M., and H. Verbruggen. 1999a. Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: an evaluation of the “ecological footprint.” Ecological Economics 29: 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Bergh, J.C.J.M., and H. Verbruggen. 1999b. An evaluation of the ecological footprint : reply to Wackernagel and Ferguson. Ecological Economics 31: 319–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M. 1999. An evaluation of the ecological footprint. Ecological Economics 31: 31–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M., L. Onisto, P. Bello, A.C. Linares, I.S.L. Falfán, J.M. Garcia, A.I.S. Guerrero, and M.G.S. Guerrero. 1999. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics 29: 375–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, J.S., R.S. Wang, and M.Z. Wang. 1998. The fundamental principles and ecotechniques of wastewater aquaculture. Ecological Engineering 10: 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young Cho, C., and D.P. Bureau. 1998. Development of bioenergetic models and the Fish-PrFEQ software to estimate production, feeding ration, and waste output in aquaculture. Aquatic Living Resources 11: 199–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalewski, M.G., A. Janauer, and G. Jolánski. 1997. Ecohydrology. A New Paradigm for the Sustainable Use of Aquatic Resources. International Hydrological Programme IHP-V Technical Documents in Hydrology Number 7. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris, France. 58 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pullin, R.S.V., Froese, R., Pauly, D. (2007). Indicators for the Sustainability of Aquaculture. In: Bert, T.M. (eds) Ecological and Genetic Implications of Aquaculture Activities. Methods and Technologies in Fish Biology and Fisheries, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6148-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics