Skip to main content

Agricultural and Food Ethics in the Western World: A Case of Ethical Imperialism?

  • Chapter
Ethics, Hunger and Globalization

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Appleby, M.C., 1999. What Should We Do About Animal Welfare? Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, K.J., A. Van Deynze, N. Gutterson, W. Parrott and S,H. Strauss, 2005. Regulating transgenic crops sensibly: Lessons from plant breeding, biotechnology and genomics. Nature Biotechnology 23(4): 439–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doerfler, R.L. and K.J. Peters, 2006. The relativity of ethical issues in animal agriculture related to different cultures and production conditions. Livestock Production Science 103: 257–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frewer, L.J., C. Howard and R. Shepherd, 1998. Understanding public attitudes to technology. Journal of Risk Research 1(3): 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaskell, G., N. Allum and S. Stares, 2003. Europeans and biotechnology in 2002. Eurobarometer 58.0 (2nd edn: 21 March 2003). Report to the EC Directorate General for Research from the project ‘Life Sciences in European Society’ QLG7CT-1999-00286. http://europa.eu.int/comm/ public_opinion/archives/eb_special.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., S. Rozelle, C. Pray and Q. Wang, 2002. Plant biotechnology in China. Science 295: 674–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., R. Hu, S. Rozelle and C. Pray, 2005. Insect-resistant GM rice in farmers’ fields: Assessing productivity and health effects in China. Science 308: 688–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, C., 2004. Preview: Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops 2004. ISAAA Briefs 32. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, C., 2005. Executive summary of global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2005. ISAAA Briefs No. 34. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joensen, L. and S. Semino, 2004. Argentina’s torrid love affair with the soybean. Seedling Oct 2004: 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassen, J., K.H. Madsen and P. Sandøe, 2002. Ethics and genetic engineering: Lessons to be learned from GM foods. Bioprocess Biosystems Engineering 24(5): 263–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, V. and W.A. Pengue, 1997. Herbicide tolerant soybean: Just another step in a technology treadmill? Biotechnology and Development Monitor 43: 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, K.H., B.E. Valverde and J.E. Jensen, 2002. Risk assessment of herbicide resistant crops: A Latin American perspective using rice (Oryza sativa) as a model. Weed Technology 16(1): 215–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, K.H., J.N. Thomsen, B. Strandberg and P. Sandøe, 2005. GM sugar beet – What are the concerns? Advances in Sugar Beet Research 6. IIRB (Institut International de Recherches Betteravières), Bruxelles, Belgium. Pp 25-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Men, X., F. Ge, C.A. Edwards and E.N. Yardim, 2004. Influence of pesticide applications on pests and predatory arthopods associated with transgenic Bt cotton and nontransgenic cotton plants. Phytoparasitica 32(3): 246–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Men, X., F. Ge, C.A. Edwards and E.N. Yardim, 2005. The influence of pesticide applications on Helicoverpa armigera Hübner and sucking pests in transgenic Bt cotton and non-transgenic cotton in China. Crop Protection 24: 319–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2003. The Use of Genetically Modified Crops in Developing Countries: A Follow Up Discussion Paper [available at http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/fileLibrary/ pdf/GM_Crops_Discussion_Paper_2004.pdf]. %...http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/fileLibrary/pdf/gm_crops_summary.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Olofdotter, M., B.E. Valverde and K.H. Madsen, 2000. Herbicide resistant rice (Oryza sativa L.) in a global perspective: Implications for weed management. Annals of Applied Biology 137: 279–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qaim, M. and G. Traxler, 2005. Roundup Ready soybeans in Argentina: Farm level and aggregate welfare effects. Agricultural Economics 32: 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sithole-Niang, I., J. Cohen and P. Zambrano, 2004. Putting GM technologies to work: Public research pipelines in selected African countries. African Journal of Biotechnology 3(11): 564–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabashnik, B., 2005. Refuges in India and delayed resistance to Bt crops. Nature Biotechnology 23: 414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teknologirådet, 2003. Genmodificerede afgrøder i udviklingslande – udfordringer for udviklingshjælpen. En rapport fra en arbejdsgruppe nedsat af Teknologirådet. Teknologirådets Rapporter 2003/4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walgate, R., 2003. Genetically Modified Food: The American Experience. Summary of a Conference organized by the Danish Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment and the BioTIK Secretariat, Copenhagen 11–12 June 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, A.J.F., 1994. Animal Welfare: A Cool Eye Towards Eden. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • White House, 2003. President Bush Urges Congress to Pass BioShield Legislation. Remarks by the President at the Bio 2003 Convention Center and Exhibition, Washington Convention, Center [available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/06/20030623-2.html].

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfenbarger, L.L. and P.R. Phifer, 2000. The ecological risks and benefits of genetically engineered plants. Science 290: 2088–2093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, K., W. Mu, G. Liang and Y. Guo, 2005. Regional reversion of insecticide resistance in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae) is associated with the use of Bt cotton in northern China. Pest Management Science 61: 491–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, P., M. Iles, S. Yan and F. Jolliffe, 2005. Farmers’ knowledge, perceptions and practices in transgenic Bt cotton in small producer systems in Northern China. Crop Protection 24: 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sandøe, P., Madsen, K.H. (2007). Agricultural and Food Ethics in the Western World: A Case of Ethical Imperialism?. In: Pinstrup-Andersen, P., Sandøe, P. (eds) Ethics, Hunger and Globalization. The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6131-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics