Skip to main content

Degrees of Abstraction in Avicenna

How to Combine Aristotle’s De Anima and the Enneads

  • Chapter
Theories of Perception in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy

Part of the book series: Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind ((SHPM,volume 6))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  • Alexander of Aphrodisias, De Anima, in I. Bruns (ed.), Alexandri Aphrodisiensis praeter commentaria scripta minora, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca suppl. 2.1 (Berlin, 1887).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibn Sīnā, Avicenna’s De Anima [Arabic Text], being the psychological part of the Kitāb al-Shifā’, ed. F. Rahman (London, New York and Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibn Sīnā, Avicenna Latinus. Liber de Anima seu sextus de naturalibus, I–III, édition critique de la traduction latine médiévale par S. Van Riet, introduction sur la doctrine psychologique d’Avicenne par G. Verbeke (Louvain and Leiden: Peeters and Brill, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibn Sīnā, al-Nağāt min al-ġarq fι ba al-ālāt (Salvation from Sinking into the Sea of Errors), ed. M. T. Dānešpazūh (Tehran: Dānešgah Tehran, 1985); English translation of book II, ch. VI in Rahman (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibn Sīnā, Šarh Kitāb Utūlūğiyyā al-mansūb ilā Arisū li-Ibn Sιnā, ed.‘ Badawī, Aristū.‘inda l-‘Arab. Dirāsat wa-nusūs ġayr manšūra (Cairo: Maktabat al-Nah al-miriyya, 1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pseudo-Theologia Aristotelis, ed. ‘A. Badawī, Aflāfīn. ‘inda l-‘arab. Plotinus apud Arabes. Theologia Aristotelis et fragmenta quae supersunt(Cairo: Dār al-Nah al-miriyya, 1966); translated by G. Lewis, in Plotini Opera II, Enneades IV–V ediderunt P. Henry et H.-R. Schwyzer (Paris and Louvain: Desclée de Brouwer and L’Édition Universelle, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Adamson, P., “Correcting Plotinus: Soul’s Relationship to Body in Avicenna’s Commentary on the Theology of Aristotle”, in P. Adamson, H. Baltussen and M. W. F. Stone (eds.), Philosophy, Science & Exegesis in Greek, Arabic & Latin Commentaries, vol. II, (London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2004), 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adamson, P., “Non-Discursive Thought in Avicenna’s Commentary on the Theology of Aristotle”, in J. McGinnis and D. Reisman (eds.), Interpreting Avicenna: Science and Philosophy in Medieval Islam. Proceedings of the Second Conference of the Avicenna Study Group (Leiden, Boston and Köln: Brill, 2004), 87–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnzen, R., Aristoteles’ De Anima.Eine verlorene spätantike Paraphrase in arabischer und persischer Überlieferung. Arabischer text nebst Kommentar, Quellengeschichtlichen Studien und Glossaren (Leiden, New York and Köln: Brill, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Badawī, A., Aristūtālιs fι al-nafs (Cairo: Maktabat al-Nah al-miriyya, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, W., “Philoponus on Self-Awareness”, in R. Sorabji (ed.), Philoponus and the Rejection of Aristotelian Science (London: Duckworth, 1987), 154–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertolacci, A., “Il pensiero filosofico di Avicenna”, in C. D’Ancona (ed.), Storia della filosofia nell’Islam medievale II (Torino: Einaudi, 2005), 522–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D., “Estimation (wahm) in Avicenna: the Logical and Psychological Dimensions”, Dialogue 32 (1993), 224–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D., “Avicenna on the Ontological and Epistemic Status of Fictional Beings”, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 8 (1997), 425–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D., “Imagination and Estimation: Arabic Paradigms and Western Transformations”, Topoi 19 (2000), 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, H. J., “Plotinus’ Adaptation of Aristotle’s Psychology: Sensation, Imagination and Memory”, in R. Baine Harris (ed.), The Significance of Neoplatonism (Norfolk VA: International Society for Neoplatonic Studies, 1976), 41–58 (repr. in idem, Soul and Intellect. Studies in Plotinus and Later Neoplatonism (Aldershot: Variorum, 1993), same pagination).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, H. J., “Neoplatonic Elements in the De Anima Commentaries”, Phronesis 21 (1976), 64–87 (repr. in R. Sorabji (ed.), Aristotle Transformed. The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence (London: Duckworth, 1990), 305–324).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, H. J., “The Psychology of (?) Simplicius’ Commentary on the De Anima”, in H. J. Blumenthal and A. C. Lloyd (eds.), Soul and the Structure of Being in Late Neoplatonism (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1982), 73–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, H. J., “John Philoponus and Stephanus of Alexandria: Two Neoplatonic Christian Commentators of Aristotle?” in D. J. O’Meara (ed.), Neoplatonism and Christian Thought, (Norfolk VA: International Society for Neoplatonic Studies, 1982), 54–63 and 244–46 (repr. in Soul and Intellect. Studies in Plotinus and Later Neoplatonism (Aldershot: Variorum, 1993), same pagination).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, H. J., “Body and Soul in Philoponus”, The Monist 69 (1986), 370–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, H. J., “Simplicius (?) on the First Book of Aristotle’s De Anima”, in I. Hadot (ed.), Simplicius. Sa vie, son œuvre, sa survie (Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 1987), 91–112 (repr. in Soul and Intellect. Studies in Plotinus and Later Neoplatonism (Aldershot: Variorum, 1993), same pagination).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, H. J., “Nous pathetikos in Later Greek Philosophy”, in H. Blumenthal and H. Robinson (eds.), Aristotle and the Later Tradition, Supplementary volume of the Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991), 191–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, H. J., “Were Aristotle’s Intentions in Writing the De Anima Forgotten in Late Antiquity?”, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 8 (1997), 143–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlton, W., Philoponus. On Aristotle on the Intellect (London: Duckworth, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiaradonna, R., “Plotino e la teoria degli universali (Enn. VI 3[44], 9)”, in V. Celluprica, R. Chiaradonna and C. D’Ancona (eds.), Aristotele e i suoi esegeti neoplatonici. Logica e ontologia nelle interpretazioni greche e arabe. Atti del convegno internazionale, Roma, 19–20 ottobre 2001 (Napoli: Bibliopolis, 2004), 3–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiaradonna, R., “Concetti generali, astrazioni e forme in Porfirio”, in Ch. Erismann (ed.), De la logique á l’ontologie. Ètudes sur la philosophie de Porphyre et son influence durant l’Antiquitè tardive et le haut Moyen Âge, Atti della giornata di studio “La filosofia di Porfirio e la sua ricezione tardo-antica e alto-medievale”, Istituto Svizzero, Roma, 02/04/2004 (Paris: Vrin) (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiaradonna, R., “Porphyry’s Views on the Immanent Incorporeals”, G. Karamanolis and A. Sheppard (eds.), Studies on Porphyry, BICS Supplement 98 (London, 2007), 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ancona, C., “Porphyry, Universal Soul and the Arabic Plotinus”, Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 9 (1999), 47–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ancona, C., “The Timaeus Model for Creation and Providence. An Example of Continuity and Adaptation in Early Arabic Philosophical Literature”, in Gretchen J. Reydams-Schils (ed.), Plato’s Timaeus as a Cultural Icon (Notre Dame (Indiana): University of Notre Dame Press, 2003), 206–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ancona, C., “The Topic of the ‘Harmony Between Plato and Aristotle’: Some Examples in Early Arabic Philosophy”, A. Speer and L. Wegener (eds.), Wissen über Grenzen. Arabische Philosophie und Lateinische Mittelalter (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2006), 379–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, H. A., Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes, on Intellect. Their Cosmologies, Theories of the Active Intellect, and Theories of the Human Intellect (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Smet, D., “La doctrine avicennienne des deux faces de l’âme et ses racines ismaèliennes”, Studia Islamica 93 (2001), 77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Smet, D., “Avicenne et l’ismaèlisme post-fatimide, selon la Risāla al-mufιda fι ιā mulġaz al-qaιda de ‘Ali b. Muammad b. al-Walid (ob. 1215)”, in J. Janssens and D. De Smet (eds.), Avicenna and his Heritage. Acts of the International Colloquium (Leuven and Louvain-la-Neuve: Leuven University Press, 2002), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druart, Th.-A., “Imagination and the Soul-Body Problem in Arabic Philosophy”, Analecta Husserliana 16 (1983), 327–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druart, Th.-A., The Soul-Body Problem: Avicenna and Descartes”, in Th.-A. Druart (ed.), Arabic Philosophy and the West. Continuity and Interaction (Washington: Georgetown University, 1988), 27–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druart, Th.-A., The Human Soul’s Individuation and its Survival After the Body’s Death: Avicenna on the Causal Relation Between Body and Soul”, Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 10 (2000), 259–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress, G., “La ‘Concordance entre Platon et Aristote’, l’Aristote arabe et l’èmancipation de la philosophie en Islam mèdièval”, in B. Mojsisch and O. Pluta (eds.), Historia Philosophiae Medii Aevi. Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Grüner, 1991), 237–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress, G., “The Circle of al-Kindi. Early Arabic Translations from the Greek and the Rise of Islamic Philosophy”, in G. Endress and R. Kruk (eds.), The Ancient Tradition in Christian and Islamic Hellenism. Studies on the Transmission of Greek Philosophy and Sciences dedicated to H. J. Drossaart Lulofs on his ninetienth birthday (Leiden: Research School CNWS, 1997), 43–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress, G. and Gutas, D., A Greek and Arabic Lexicon (GALex). Materials for a Dictionary of the Mediaeval Translations from Greek into Arabic, Vol. I (Leiden, New York and Köln: Brill, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Esfeld, M., “Aristotle’s Direct Realism in De Anima”, The Review of Metaphysics 54 (2000), 321–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. M., “Some Fragments of Translation of De Anima”, Cahiers de Byrsa 8 (1958–1959), 231–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galston, M., “A Re-examination of al-Fārābi’s Neoplatonism”, Journal of the History of Philosophy 15 (1977), 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardet, L., “En l’honneur du millènaire d’Avicenne. L’importance d’un texte nouvellement traduit’, Revue Thomiste 59 (1951), 333–345 (repr. as “Avicenne commentateur de Plotin”, in Ètudes de philosophie et de mystique comparèes (Paris: Vrin, 1972), 135–146).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoffroy, M., “La tradition arabe du d’Alexandre d’Aphrodise et les origines de la thèorie farabienne des quatre degrès de l’intellect, in C. D’Ancona and G. Serra (eds.), Aristotele e Alessandro di Afrodisia nella tradizione araba (Padova: Il Poligrafo, 2002), 191–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutas, D., “Philoponos and Avicenna on the Separability of the Intellect. A Case of Orthodox Christian–Muslim Agreement”, Greek Orthodox Theological Review 31 (1986), 121–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutas, D., Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition. Introduction to Reading Avicenna’s Philosophical Works (Leiden, New York, København and Köln: Brill, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutas, D., “Intuition and Thinking: the Evolving Structure of Avicenna’s Epistemology”, in R. Wisnovsky (ed.), Aspects of Avicenna (Princeton: Markus Wiener Publishers, 2001), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutas, D., “The Heritage of Avicenna: the Golden Age of Arabic Philosophy, 1000–ca.1350”, in Avicenna and his Heritage. Acts of the International Colloquium (Leuven and Louvain-la-Neuve: Leuven University Press, 2002), 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadot, I., Le probléme du nèoplatonisme alexandrin. Hièroclés et Simplicius (Paris: Etudes Augustiniennes, 1978), 193–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadot, I., “Aspects de le thèorie de la perception chez les nèoplatoniciens: sensation , sensation commune , sensibles communs et conscience de soi ”, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 8 (1997), 33–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadot, I., “Simplicius or Priscianus? On the Author of the Commentary on Aristotle’s De Anima (CAG IX): a Methodological Study”, Mnemosyne 55 (2002), 159–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadot, P., “L’harmonie des philosophies de Plotin et d’Aristote selon Porphyre dans le commentaire de Dexippe sur les Catègories’, in Plotino e il neoplatonismo in Oriente e in Occidente, Atti del convegno internazionale, Roma, 5–9 ottobre 1970 (Roma: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, 1974), 31–47 (repr. as “The Harmony of Plotinus and Aristotle According to Porphyry” in R. Sorabji (ed.), Aristotle Transformed. The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence (London: Duckworth, 1990), 125–140).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasnawi, A., “La conscience de soi chez Avicenne et Descartes”, in J. Biard and R. Rashed (eds.), Descartes et le Moyen Age (Paris: Vrin, 1997), 283–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasse, D. N., “Avicenna on Abstraction”, in R. Wisnovsky (ed.), Aspects of Avicenna (Princeton: Markus Wiener Publishers, 2001), 39–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, P., “Une comparaison chez Aristote, Alexandre et Plotin” in Les Sources de Plotin. Entretiens de la Fondation Hardt, V (Vandœuvres and Genéve: Fondation Hardt, 1960), 429–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssens, J., “Creation and Emanation in Avicenna”, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 8 (1997), 455–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karamanolis, G., “Porphyry: the First Platonist Commentator on Aristotle”, in P. Adamson, H. Baltussen and M. W. F. Stone (eds.), Philosophy, Science and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentaries, Supplementary volume of the Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies (London, 2004), 197–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, P., “Plotin chez les Arabes. Remarques sur un nouveau fragment de la paraphrase arabe des Ennèades”, Bulletin de l’Institut d’Egypte 23 (1940–1941), 263–295 (repr. in P. Kraus, Alchemie, Ketzerei, Apokryphen im frühen Islam. Gesammelte Aufsätze, ed. R. Brague (Hildesheim, Zürich and New York: G. Olms Verlag, 1994), 313–345).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, K., Der Metaphysikbegriff in den Aristoteles-Kommentaren der Ammonius-Schule (Münster: Aschendorff, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lameer, J., Al-Farabi and Aristotelian Syllogistics: Greek Theory and Islamic Practice (Leiden: Brill, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, U. M., John Philoponus and the Controversies over Chalcedon in the Sixth Century. A Study and Translation of the Arbiter (Leuven: Peeters, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • La philosophie des mathèmatiques de l’Antiquitè tardive. Actes du colloque international Fribourg, Suisse (24–26 septembre 1998) ed. G. Bechtle and D. J. O’Meara (Fribourg: Editions Universitaires, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lautner, P., “Philoponus, in De Anima III: Quest for an author”, Classical Quarterly 42 (1992), 510–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Philoponean Accounts on Phantasia”, Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 34 (1993), 159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahdi, M., Alfarabi and the Foundation of Islamic Political Philosophy (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmura, M. E., “Avicenna’s Flying Man in Context”, The Monist 69 (1986), 383–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini Bonadeo, C., “Al-Fārābi. La psicologia, la gnoseologia e la filosofia della mente”, in C. D’Ancona (ed.), Storia della filosofia nell’Islam medievale I (Torino: Einaudi, 2005), 409–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merlan, Ph., From Platonism to Neoplatonism (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 19683).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michot, J., “L’építre sur la connaissance de l’âme rationnelle et de ses ètats attribuèe á Avicenne”, Revue Philosophique de Louvain 82 (1984), 479–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michot, J., “L’èpitre sur la disparition des formes intelligibles vaines aprés la mort d’Avicenne”, Bulletin de Philosophie Mèdièvale 29 (1987), 152–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, D. J., Pythagoras Revived. Mathematics and Philosophy in Late Antiquity (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pines, S., “La conception de la conscience de soi chez Avicenne et chez Abū l-Barakāt al-Baġdādi”, Archives d’Histoire doctrinale et littèraire du Moyen Age 29 (1954), 21–98 (repr. in Studies in Abū l-Barakāt al-Baġdādi (Leiden: Brill, 1979), 181–258).

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotino. La discesa dell’anima nei corpi (Enn. IV 8[6]). Plotiniana Arabica (pseudo-Teologia di Aristotele, capitoli 1 e 7; “Detti del Sapiente Greco”), ed. C. D’Ancona, (Padova: Il Poligrafo, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, F., Avicenna’s Psychology. An English Translation of Book II, Chapter VI with Historico–Philosophical Notes and Textual Improvements on the Cairo Edition (London: Oxford University Press, 1952, repr. Westport: Hyperion, 1981 and 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, F., Avicenna’s De Anima [Arabic Text], Being the Psychological Part of the Kitāb al-Shifā’, ed. F. Rahman (London, New York and Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Riet, S. van, “Fragments de l’original grec du De Intellectu de Philopon dans une compilation de Sophonias”, Revue Philosophique de Louvain 63 (1965), 5–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, V., “Die sogenannte Theologie des Aristoteles aus dem Arabischen übersetzt und mit Anmerkungen versehen von Fr. Dieterici” (book review), Deutsche Litteraturzeitung 24 (1883), 843–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrenk, L. P., “Faculties of Judgment in the Didaskalikos”, Mnemosyne 44 (1991), 347–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrenk, L. P., “The Middle Platonic Reception of Aristotelian Science”, Rheinisches Museum 136 (1993), 342–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebti, M., Avicenne. L’âme humaine (Paris: P.U.F., 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrenk, L. P., “La distinction entre intellect pratique et intellect thèorique dans la doctrine de l’âme humaine d’Avicenne”, Philosophie 77 (2003), 23–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrenk, L. P., “Une èpitre inèdite d’Avicenne, Taalluq al-nafs bi-l-badan (De l’attachement de l’âme et du corps): èdition critique, traduction et annotation”, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 15 (2004), 39–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrenk, L. P., “Le statut ontologique de l’image dans la doctrine avicennienne de la perception”, Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 15 (2005), 109–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, A., “Phantasia and Mental Images: Neoplatonist Interpretations of De Anima, 3.3” in H. Blumenthal and H. Robinson (eds.), Aristotle and the Later Tradition, Supplementary volume of the Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991), 165–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, C., The Changing Self. A Study on the Soul in Later Neoplatonism: Iamblichus, Damascius and Priscianus, Verhandelingen van de Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van België (Brussels: Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel C. and Bossier, F., “Priscianus Lydus en de In De Anima van pseudo (?) Simplicius”, Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 34 (1972), 761–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strohmaier, G., “Avicenne et le phènoméne des ècrits pseudèpigraphiques”, in J. Janssens and D. De Smet (eds.), Avicenna and his Heritage. Acts of the International Colloquium (Leuven and Louvain-la-Neuve: Leuven University Press, 2002), 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urmson, J. O., “Introduction” in Simplicius, On Aristotle on the Soul 1.1–2.4, translated by J.O. Urmson, notes by P. Lautner (London: Duckworth, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vajda, G., “Les notes d’Avicenne sur la Thèologie d’Aristote”, Revue Thomiste 59 (1951), 346–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, G., Jean Philopon. Commentaire sur le De Anima d’Aristote. Traduction de Guillaume de Moerbeke (Paris: Publications Universitaires de Louvain and Bèatrice-Nauwelaerts, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisnovsky, R., Avicenna’s Metaphysics in Context (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson, H. A., “The Internal Senses in Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Philosophical Texts”, Harvard Theological Review 27 (1935), 69–133 (repr. in idem, Studies in the History of Philosophy and Religion, I, (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1973), 250–314).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zambon, M., Porphyre et le Moyen-Platonisme (Paris: Vrin, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, F. W., “The Origins of the So-Called Theology of Aristotle”, in J. Kraye, W. F. Ryan and C. B. Schmitt (eds.), Pseudo-Aristotle in the Middle Ages. The Theology and Other Texts (London: The Warburg Institute, 1986), 110–240.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

D’Ancona, C. (2008). Degrees of Abstraction in Avicenna. In: Knuuttila, S., Kärkkäinen, P. (eds) Theories of Perception in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy. Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6125-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics