Designing filters for copper removal for the secondary treatment of storm water

  • H Genç-Fuhrman
  • P Steen Mikkelsen
  • A Ledin
Conference paper
Part of the Alliance For Global Sustainability Bookseries book series (AGSB, volume 12)

In this study alumina and granulated activated carbon (GAC) are investigated as potential storm water filtration media by testing their heavy metal (i.e., As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, and Zn) removal efficiency in batch and column experiments at a starting pH of 6.5. However, only Cu removal results are presented here due to space concerns. It is found that the equilibrium time for Cu sorption is 2 h for both sorbents, and that the Freundlich adsorption isotherm moderately fits to the sorption data possibly due to the fact that the isotherm fails to take into account the competitive sorption as well as possible precipitation. The results also suggest the presence of humic acid (HA) suppresses the removal, while that of Fe colloids (FC) (FC) is insignificant.

Keywords

Zinc Porosity Filtration Hydroxide Sludge 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    USEPA (1996) National water quality inventory - 1996 Reports to Congress Office of Water, USEPA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Makepeace DK, Smith DW, Stanley SJ (1995) Urban stormwater quality: summary of contaminant data. Environ Sci Technol 25:93-139Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grout H, Wiesner MR, Bottero J (1999) Analysis of colloidal phases in urban stormwater runoff. Environ Sci Technol 33:831-839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dario M, Ledin A (1997) Sorption of Cd to colloidal ferric hydroxides-impact of pH and organic acids. Chem Spec Biol 9:3-14Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pedersen HD, Postma D, Jacobsen R, Larsen O (2005) Fast transformation of iron hydroxides by the catalytic action of aqueous Fe(II). Geochim Cosmochim Acta 69:3967-3977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Genç-Fuhrman H, Mikkelsen PS, Ledin A. Filtration materials for stormwater treatment: a review (in preparation)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Genç-Fuhrman H, Mikkelsen PS, Ledin A (2007) Simultaneous removal of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni and Zn from stormwater: experimental comparison of 11 different sorbents. Water Res 41:591-602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen JP, Wang X (2000) Removing Copper, Zinc, and Lead Ion by granular activated carbon in pretreated fixed-bed columns. Sep Purif Technol 19:157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Genç-Fuhrman H, Mikkelsen PS, Ledin A. Effect of, time, pH, humic acid and iron colloids on the heavy metal removal (in preparation)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alcacio TE, Hesterberg D, Chou JW, Martin JD, Beauchemin S, Sayers DE (2001) Molecular scale characteristics of Cu(II) bonding in goethite-humate complexes. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 65:1355-1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • H Genç-Fuhrman
    • 1
  • P Steen Mikkelsen
    • 1
  • A Ledin
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Environment & ResourcesTechnical University of DenmarkDenmark

Personalised recommendations