Skip to main content

Pensions, Privilege and Poverty: Another “Take” on Intergenerational Equity

  • Chapter
  • 735 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alanen L. (1994). “Gender and Generation: Feminism and the ‘Child Question,” In: Qvortrup J., Bardy M., Sgritta G. and Wintersberger H. (Eds.), Childhood Matters: Social Theory, Practice and Politics. Brookfield, USA: Aldershot/Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arber S.L. (2000). “Gender and the Myth of Generational Conflict in Modern Capitalist Societies”, Paper presented at the meetings of the American Sociological Association, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arber S.L. and Attias-Donfut C. (Eds.). (2000). The Myth of Generational Conflict: The Family and the State in Ageing Societies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker M. and Benjamin D. (1999). “How Do Retirement Tests Affect the Labour Supply of Older Men?”, Journal of Public Economics, 71 (January), pp. 27–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker M. and Gunderson M. (2006). “Seniors Income Adequacy”, Paper prepared for Social Development Canada Expert Roundtable on Seniors, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker I. (Ed.). (1996). “Introduction” In: Rethinking Restructuring: Gender and Change in Canada, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldus B. and Krueger H. (1999). “Work, Gender and the Life Course”, Canadian Journal of Sociology, 24(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker Sir E. (1947). Social Contract: Locke, Hume and Rousseau, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker H.A. (Ed.). (1990). Life Histories and Generations, Utrecht: ISOR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H.A. (Ed.). (1992). “A Pattern of Generations and Its Consequences”, Dynamics of Cohort and Generations Research, Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers, pp. 219–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker H.A. (1999). “Generational Change in Post-War Europe”, Paper presented at the 4th European Conference of Sociology, Amsterdam, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie J. (1997). “Meso-Discourses, State Forms and the Gendering of Liberal-Democratic Citizenship”, Citizenship Studies 1(2), pp. 223–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canada, Policy Research Initiative. (2005). Exploring New Approaches to Social Policy, Synthesis Report. Ottawa: Policy Research Initiative, Policy Council of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheal David. (2000). “Aging and Demographic Change”, Canadian Public Policy XXVI (Supplement August), S109–S122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark P.G. (1993). “Public Policy in the United States and Canada: Individualism, Family Obligation, and Collective Responsibility in the Care of the Elderly”, pp. 145–167, In: Hendricks J. and Rosenthal C. (Eds.), The Remainder of Their Days: Domestic Policy and Older Families in the United States and Canada, New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook F.L, Marshall V.W., Marshall J.G. and Kaufman J. (1994). “The Salience of Intergenerational Equity in the United States and Canada”, In: Marmor T.R., Smeeding T.M. and Greene V.L. (Eds.), Economic Security and Intergenerational Justice: A Look at North America, Washington D.C., The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corak M. (Ed.). (1998a). Government Finances and Generational Equity, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Catalogue no. 68–513-XPB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corak M. (Ed.). (1998b). Labour Markets, Social Institutions and the Future of Canada’s Children, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Catalogue no. 89–553-XPB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denton F.T. and Spencer B.G. (2000). “Population Aging and its Economic Costs: A Survey of the Issues”, Canadian Journal on Aging, 19(Supp 1), pp. 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooley M. (1994). “Women, Children and Poverty in Canada”, Canadian Public Policy, 29(4), pp. 430–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Family Relations”, The Globe and Mail, 31 August 1998, A24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein M.S. (1974). “Social Security, Induced Retirement and Aggregate Capital Accumulation“, Journal of Political Economy, 82(5), pp. 905–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnie R. (2000). “Poverty’s Poverty, Right?”, The Globe and Mail 2 October: A19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folbre N. (1994). Who Pays for the Kids? Gender and the Structures of Constraint, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foot D. (1989). “Public Expenditures, Population Aging and Economic Dependency in Canada, 1921–2021”, Population Research and Policy Review, 8(1), pp. 97–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith J.K. (1996). The Good Society: The Humane Agenda, Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier H. (1997). “L’interdépendance des générations dans un contexte de vieillissement démographique: application aux depenses sociales”, dans D’une génération à l’autre: évolution des conditions de vie, Volume 1, Bureau de la statistique du Québec, pp. 205–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier H. (1999). “Le vieillissement démographique au Québec: un défi pour la système social”, In: Véron J. et Digoix M., Age, génération et activité: vers un nouveau contrat social? Actes des 1ères Rencontres Sauvy, Paris, octobre 1998, INED, Dossiers et recherches, 80, pp. 229–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier H. (2000). “Le contrat social au Québec et au Canada: se prépare-t-on vraiment à faire face au vieillisement démographique prévisible?” (The social contract in Quebec and Canada: Are preparations really being made to face up the foreseable demographic ageing), presented at Le Contrat social à l’épreuve des changement démographiques, Deuxièmes Rencontres Sauvy, Montréal, octobre 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee E.M. (2000a). “Another Look at Pensions and the Baby Boom”, The meetings of the Canadian Sociology and Anthropology Association, Edmonton, Alberta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee E.M. (2000b). “Population and Politics: Voodoo Demography, Population Aging and Social Policy”, In: Gee E.M and Gutman G. (Eds.), The Overselling of Population Aging: Apocalyptic Demography, Intergenerational Challenges, and Social Policy. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press, pp. 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee E.M. and McDaniel S.A. (1994). “Social Policy for an Aging Society”, In: Marshall V. and McPherson B. (Eds.), Aging: Canadian Perspectives, Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview, pp. 219–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginn J. and Arber S. (2000a). “Gender, The Generational Contract and Pension Privatisation”, In: Arber S.L. and Attias-Donfut C. (Eds.), The Myth of Generational Conflict: The Family and the State in Ageing Societies, London: Routledge, pp. 133–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginn J. and Arber S. (2000b). “Personal Pension Take-up in the 1990s in Relation to Position in the Labour Market”, Journal of Social Policy, 29(2), pp. 205–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson M. and Hyatt D. (1998). “Intergenerational Considerations of Workers’ Compensation Unfunded Liabilities”, In: Corak M. (Ed.), Government Finances and Generational Equity, Ottawa: Statistics, Canada, Catalogue no. 89–553-XPB, pp. 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating N., Fast J., Frederick J., Cranswick K. and Perrier C. (1999). Eldercare in Canada: Context, Content and Consequences, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Catalogue no. 89–570-XPE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating N., Otfinowski P., Dosman D., Stadnyk R., Swindle J., Fast J. and Yoshino S. (2005). “Through a Family Lens: Caregiving to Adults”, Paper prepared for Social Development Canada, Roundtable on Families, December 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger H. and Levy R. (2001). “Linking Life Courses, Work and the Family: Theorising a Not So Visible Nexus Between Women and Men”, Canadian Journal of Sociology, 26(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laslett P. (2000). “Interconnections Over Time: Critique of the Concept of Generation”, Paper prepared for Workshop on Narrative, Generational Consciousness and Politics, University of Cambridge, UK, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell J. (1996). “Social Dimensions of Economic Growth,” The Eric John Hanson Memorial Lecture Series, Volume VIII: 25 January 1996, Department of Economics, University of Alberta.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel S.A. (1986). Canada’s Aging Population, Toronto: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel S.A. (1987). “Demographic Aging as a Guiding Paradigm in Canada’s Welfare State”, Canadian Public Policy, 13(3), pp. 330–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel S.A. (1997a). “Intergenerational Transfers, Social Solidarity, and Social Policy: Unanswered Questions and Policy Challenges”, Canadian Public Policy/Canadian Journal on Aging (joint issue), pp. 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel S.A. (1997b). “Serial Employment and Skinny Government: Reforming Caring and Sharing among Generations,” Canadian Journal on Aging, 16(3), pp. 465–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel S.A. (1998). “Intergenerational Equity: Policy and Data Implications”, In: Corak M. (Ed.), Labour Markets, Social Institutions and the Future of Canada’s Children, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Catalogue no. 89–553-XPB, pp. 171–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel S.A. (1999a). “Untangling Love and Domination: Challenges of Home Care for the Elderly in a Reconstructing Canada”, Journal of Canadian Studies, 34(3), pp. 191–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel S.A. (1999b). “Women’s Changing Relations to the State and Citizenship: The Case of Globalizing Western Democracies”, International Symposium on Democratization, International Sociological Association, Cape Town, South Africa, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel S.A. (2000). “‘What Did You Ever Do For Me?’ Intergenerational Linkages in a Restructuring Canada”, In Gee E.M and Gutman G. (Eds.), The Overselling of Population Aging: Apocalyptic Demography, Intergenerational Challenges, and Social Policy, Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press, pp. 130–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel S.A. (2001a). “Born at the Right Time? Gendered Generation and Webs of Entitlement and Responsibility”, Canadian Journal of Sociology, 26(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel S.A. (2001b). “Family Change and Life Course Development: Social Transformation on Intimate Frontiers”, In: Sales A. (Ed.), Social Transformations at the Turn of the Millenium: Sociological Theory and Current Empirical Research, Madrid: International Sociological Association, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, S.A. (2002). “Generational Consciousness Of and For Women”, In: Turner B. and Edmunds J. (Eds.), Narrative, Generational Consciousness and Politics, Walnut Creek, CA: Rowman Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel S.A. (2003a). “Intergenerational Interlinkages: Public, Family and Work”, In: Cheal D. (Ed.), Aging and Demographic Change in Canadian Context, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel S.A. (2003b). “Toward Disentangling Policy Implications of Economic and Demographic Changes in Canada’s Aging Population”, Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de Politiques, XXIX (4), pp. 491–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel S.A. (2004). “Generationing Gender: Justice and the Division of Welfare”, Journal of Aging Studies, 18(1), pp. 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMullin J. (2000). “Diversity and the State of Sociological Aging Theory”, The Gerontologist, 40(5), pp. 513–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore E. and Rosenberg M. (with McGuiness D.) (1997). Growing Old in Canada: Demographic and Geographic Perspectives, Toronto and Ottawa: ITP Nelson and Statistics Canada, Catalogue no. 96–321-MPE No.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morissette R. and Drolet M. (1999). “The Evolution of Pension Coverage of Young and Prime-Aged Workers in Canada”, Research Paper Series, 138, Analytical Studies Branch. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustard C.A., Barer M., Evans R.G., Horne J., Mayer T. and Derksen S. (1998). “Paying Taxes and Using Health Care Services: The Distributional Consequences of Tax Financed Universal Health Insurance in a Canadian Province”, Ottawa: Conference on the State of Living Standards and the Quality of Life in Canada, 30–31 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myles J. (2000). “The Maturation of Canada’s Retirement Income System: Income Levels, Income Inequality and Low-Income among the Elderly”, Research Paper Series, 147, Analytical Studies Branch. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myles J. and Picot G. (2000). “Social Transfers, Earnings and Low-Income Intensity among Canadian Children, 1981–96: Highlighting Recent Developments in Low-Income Measurement”, Research Paper Series, 144, Analytical Studies Branch. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill J. (1994). The Missing Child in Liberal Theory: Towards a Covenant Theory of Family, Welfare Community and the Civic State, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osberg L. (1993). “Is it Retirement or Unemployment? Induced ‘Retirement’ and Constrained Labour Supply Among Older Workers”, Applied Economics, April, pp. 210–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quadragno J. (1998). “What is a Good Society and How Can Sociology Help to Create it?” Presidential Address, American Sociological Association, San Francisco, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quadragno J. (1999). Aging and the Life Course, Boston: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid A. (1999). “Family Income: Twenty-Five Years of Stability and Change”, Perspectives on Labour and Income, 11(1), pp. 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau J.-J. (1762). “The Social Contract”, In: Barker Sir E. (Ed.). (1947). Social Contract: Locke, Hume and Roussea, Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 169–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauve R. “The Current State of Canadian Family Finances”, Vanier Institute of the Family, http://www.ivfamille.ca/library/cft/state05.html#Wow Retrieved 11 February 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz J. (1988). The Economics of Aging, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson J. (1998). “The Fickle Charms of Democracy”, The Globe and Mail, 2 December, A28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol T. (1998). “The Future of American Social Policy”, American Sociological Association, San Francisco, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, A. 1991. “The Restructuring of Gender Relations in an Aging Society”, Acta Sociologica 34(1), pp. 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada (1984). Population Projections for Canada, Provinces and Territories, 1984–2006, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Catalogue no. 91–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada (2000). Income Trends in Canada, 1980–1997 on CD-Rom, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Catalogue no. 13F0022XCB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone L.O., Rosenthal C.J. and Connidis I.A. (1998). Parent-Child Exchanges of Supports and Intergenerational Equity, Ottawa: Statistics Canada. Catalogue no. 89–557-XPE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner B.S. (1998). “Ageing and Generational Conflicts: A Reply to Sarah Irwin”, British Journal of Sociology, 49(2), pp. 299–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson M., Rowe G., Lin X. and Gribble S.F. (1998). “Historical Generational Accounting with Heterogeneous Populations”, in Corak M. (Ed.), Government Finances and Generational Equity, Ottawa: Statistics Canada. Catalogue no. 68–513-XPBn, pp. 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McDaniel, S.A. (2007). Pensions, Privilege and Poverty: Another “Take” on Intergenerational Equity. In: Ages, Generations and the Social Contract. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5973-5_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics