Advertisement

Segmented Discourse Representation Theory: Dynamic Semantics With Discourse Structure

  • Alex Lascarides
  • Nicholas Asher
Part of the Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy book series (SLAP, volume 83)

Keywords

Predicate Symbol Discourse Structure Word Sense Disambiguation Computational Linguistics Dynamic Semantic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asher, N.: 1993, Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Asher, N. and T. Fernando: 1997, ‘Labelling Representation for Effective Disambiguation’. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Computational Semantics (IWCS-2). Tilburg, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
  3. Asher, N. and A. Lascarides: 1998, ‘The Semantics and Pragmatics of Presupposition’. Journal of Semantics 15(2), 239–299.Google Scholar
  4. Asher, N. and A. Lascarides: in press, Logics of Conversation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Asudeh, A. and R. Crouch: 2001, ‘Glue Semantics for hpsg’. In: Proceedings of HPSG-2001. Trondheim, Norway.Google Scholar
  6. Beaver, D.: 1996, ‘Local Satisfaction Preferred’. In: P. Dekker and M. Stokhof (eds.): Proceedings of the 10th Amsterdam Colloqium. ILLC, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  7. Bos, J.: 1995, ‘Predicate Logic Unplugged’. In: Proceedings of the 10th Amsterdam Colloquim. Amsterdam, pp. 133–143.Google Scholar
  8. Copestake, A., D. Flickinger, I. A. Sag, and C. Pollard: 1999, ‘Minimal Recursion Semantics: An Introduction’. available from http://www-csli.stanford.edu/∼ aac.Google Scholar
  9. Copestake, A., A. Lascarides, and D. Flickinger: 2001, ‘An Algebra for Semantic Construction in Constraint-based Grammars’. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL/EACL 2001). Toulouse, pp. 132–139.Google Scholar
  10. Dagan, I., L. Lee, and F. C. N. Pereira: 1997, ‘Similarity-based Methods for Word Sense Disambiguation’. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 8th Meeting of the European Chapter for the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL97/EACL97). Madrid, pp. 56–63.Google Scholar
  11. Davidson, D.: 1980, Essays on Actions and Events. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fernando, T.: 1994, ‘Bisimulations and Predicate Logic’. Journal of Symbolic Logic 59(3), 924–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geurts, B.: 1996, ‘Local Satisfaction Guaranteed’. Linguistics and Philosophy 19, 259–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof: 1991, ‘Dynamic Predicate Logic’. Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 39–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grosz, B., A. Joshi, and S. Weinstein: 1995, ‘Centering: A Framework for Modelling the Local Coherence of Discourse’. Computational Linguistics 21(2), 203–226.Google Scholar
  16. Grosz, B. and C. Sidner: 1986, ‘Attention, Intentions and the Structure of Discourse’. Compuational Linguistics 12, 175–204.Google Scholar
  17. Grosz, B. and C. Sidner: 1990, ‘Plans for Discourse’. In: J. M. P. R. Cohen and M. Pollack (eds.): Intentions in Communication. pp. 365–388.Google Scholar
  18. Guthrie, J., L. Guthrie, Y. Wilks, and H. Aldinejad: 1991, ‘Subject-Dependent Co-Occurrence andWord Sense Disambiguation’. In: Proceedings of the 29th Association for Computational Linguistics. Berkeley, pp. 146–152.Google Scholar
  19. Heim, I.: 1982, ‘The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases’. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachussetts.Google Scholar
  20. Hobbs, J. R.: 1979, ‘Coherence and Coreference’. Cognitive Science 3(1), 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hobbs, J. R.: 1985, ‘On the Coherence and Structure of Discourse’. Technical Report csli-85-37, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  22. Hobbs, J. R., M. Stickel, D. Appelt, and P. Martin: 1993, ‘Interpretation as Abduction’. Artificial Intelligence 63(1–2), 69–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kamp, H.: 1981, ‘A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation’. In: M. B. J. S. J. A. G. Groenendijk, T. M. V. Janssen (ed.): Formal Methods in the Study of Language. Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam, pp. 277–322.Google Scholar
  24. Kamp, H. and U. Reyle: 1993, From Discourse to the Lexicon: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Kamp, H. and C. Rohrer: 1983, ‘Tense in Texts’. In: C. S. R. Bauerle and A. von Stechow (eds.): Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 250–269.Google Scholar
  26. Koller, A., K. Mehlhorn, and J. Niehren: 2000, ‘A Polynomial-time Fragment of Dominance Constraints’. In: Proceeedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL2000). Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  27. Lascarides, A. and N. Asher: 1993, ‘Temporal Interpretation, Discourse Relations and Commonsense Entailment’. Linguistics and Philosophy 16(5), 437–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lascarides, A., N. Asher, and J. Oberlander: 1992, ‘Inferring Discourse Relations in Context’. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL92). Delaware, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  29. Lochbaum, K. E.: 1998, ‘A Collaborative Planning Model of Intentional Structure’. Computational Linguistics 24(4), 525–572.Google Scholar
  30. Mann, W. C. and S. A. Thompson: 1987, ‘Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Framework for the Analysis of Texts’. International Pragmatics Association Papers in Pragmatics 1, 79–105.Google Scholar
  31. Montague, R. M.: 1974, ‘The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English’. In: Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague. Yale University Press, pp. 247–270.Google Scholar
  32. Muskens, R.: 1996, ‘Combining Montague Semantics and Discourse Representation’. Linguistics and Philosophy 19, 143–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reyle, R.: 1993, ‘Dealing with Ambiguities by Underspecification: Construction, Interpretation and Deduction’. Journal of Semantics 10, 123–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stone, M. and R. Thomason: 2002, ‘Context in Abductive Interpretation’. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (Edilog). Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  35. Traum, D. and J. Allen: 1994, ‘Discourse Obligations in Dialogue Processing’. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL94). Las Cruces, New Mexico, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  36. van der Sandt, R.: 1992, ‘Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution’. Journal of Semantics 9(4), 333–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Webber, B. L.: 1991, ‘Structure and Ostension in the Interpretation of Discourse Deixis’. Natural Language and Cognitive Processes 6(2), 107–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex Lascarides
  • Nicholas Asher

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations