Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Computing Meaning pp 55–85Cite as

Semantic Underspecification: Which Technique For What Purpose?

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 83))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, J.: 1995, ‘Natural Language Understanding’. Redwood City, California: Benjamin/Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alshawi, H.: 1990, ‘Resolving Quasi Logical Form.’ Computational Linguistics 16:133–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alshawi, H.: 1992, ‘The Core Language Engine’. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alshawi, H. and J. van Eijck: 1992, ‘Logical Forms in the Core Language Engine’. In Proceedings ACL’87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alshawi, H. and D. Crouch: 1992, ‘Monotonic semantic interpretations’. In Proceedings ACL’92, pp. 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, J.: 1995, ‘Predicate Logic Unplugged’. In Proceedings of the 10th Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam: ILLC, pp. 133–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, J.: 2002, ‘Underspecification and resolution in discourse semantics’. Ph.D. Thesis, Saarland University, Saarbrücken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronnenberg, W., H. Bunt, J. Landsbergen, R. Scha, W. Schoenmakers & E. van Utteren: 1979, The question answering system Phliqa1. In L. Bolc (ed.) Natural language question answering systems. London: McMillan, pp. 217–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunt, H.: 1984, ‘The resolution of quantificational ambiguity in the Tendum system.’ Proceedings COLING 1984 , Stanford University, pp. 130–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunt, H.: 1985, ‘Mass terms and model-theoretic semantics.’ Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunt, H.: 1995, ‘Semantics and Pragmatics in the ΔELTA Project.’ In: L. Dybkjaer, editor, Proceedings of the Second Spoken Dialogue and Discoure Workshop, Topics in Cognitive Science and HCI, Vol.8. Roskilde: Centre for Cognitive Science, pp. 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunt, H.: 2005, ‘Quantification and modification as Feature Structures’. In Proceedings of the Sixth Internationanl Workshop on Computational Semantics IWCS-6, Tilburg, pp. 54–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunt, H.: 2006: ‘Mass expressions’. In K.Brown, editor, Encyclopedia of Language and Liguistics, Second Edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 5757–5760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunt, H., R.J. Beun, F. Dols, J.v.d. Linden & G. Schwartzenberg: 1984, ‘The Tendum dialogue system and its theoretical foundations.’ IPO Annual Progress Report 19, 105–113, Eindhoven: IPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunt, H. & R. Muskens: 1999, ‘Computational Semantics’. In H. Bunt & R. Muskens (eds.) Computing Meaning, Vol. 1. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R.: 1983, ‘Quantification and Syntactic Theory.’ Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copestake, A., D. Flickinger, R. Malouf, I. Sag & S. Riehemann: 1995, ‘Minimal Recursion Semantics’. Unpublished ms., CSLI, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copestake, A. and D. Flickinger: 2000, ‘An Open Source Grammar Development Environment and Broad-coverage English Grammar Using HPSG’. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. Athens, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple, M.: 2001. ‘Lexical-Functional Grammar’. San Diego, Calif.; London : Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1967, ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’. In: N. Rescher (ed.): The Logic of Decision and Action. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deemter, K. van: 1996, ‘Towards a logic of Ambiguous Expressions’. In S. Peters and K. van Deemter, editors, Semantic Ambiguity and Underspecification. Stanford: CSLI, pp. 203–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deemter, K. van, G. Brockhoff, H. Bunt, M. Meya and J. de Vet: 1985 ‘From Tendum to spicos, or: How flexible is the Tendum approach to question answering?’ IPO Annual Progress Report 20, 83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, C.: 2005, Formal Investigations of Underspecified Representations. Ph.D. Thesis, King’s College, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egg, M., A. Koller and J. Niehren: 2001, ‘The constraint language for lambda structures’. Journal for Logic, Language, and Information 10, 457–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenstad, J.E., P. Halvorsen, T. Langholm, and van Benthem: 1987, ‘Situations, Language and Logic’. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 34, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraassen, B. van: 1966, ‘Singular terms, truth-values gaps, and free logic’. Journal of Philosophy 63.17: 481–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardent, C. and B. Webber: 1998, ‘Describing discourse semantics.’ In Proceedings of the 4 th TAG+ Workshop, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geurts, B. & G. Rentier: 1991, ‘Quasi logical form in PLUS’. Esprit project P5254 (PLUS) internal report, Tilburg: Institute for Language Technology and Artificial Intelligence ITK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, J.: 1985, ‘Ontological Promiscuity.’ In Proc. 23rd Annual meeting of the ACL, Chicago, 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, J. and S. Shieber: 1987, ‘An algorithm for generating quantifier scopings’. Computational Linguistics 13 (1–2):47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, J., M. Stickel, D. Appelt & P. Martin: 1993, ‘Interpretation as Abduction’. Artificial Intelligence 63: 69–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, W.: 1998, ‘Nested Cooper Storage: The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary Noun Phrases’. In: U. Reyle & C. Rohrer (eds.) Natural Language Parsing and Linguistic theories. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kievit, L.: 1998, ‘Context-driven natural language interpretation’. Ph.D. Thesis, Tilburg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kievit, L., P. Piwek, R.J. Beun & H. Bunt: 2001, ‘Multimodal Cooperative Resolution of Referential Expressions in the DenK system.’ In H. Bunt & R.J. Beun (eds) Cooperative Multimodal Communication. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 197–214.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koller, A., J. Niehren, and S. Thater: 2003, ‘Bridging the gap between underspecification formalisms: Hole semantics as dominance constraints.’ Proceedings of the 11 th EACL, Budapest, pp. 195–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koller, A.: 2004, ‘Constraint-Based and Graph-Based Resolution of Ambiguities in Natural Language’. Ph.D. Thesis, Saarland University, Saarbrücken.

    Google Scholar 

  • König, E. & Reyle, U.: 1996, ‘A General Reasoning Scheme for Underspecified Representations.’ In: H.J. Ohlbach & U. Reyle (eds.) Logic and its Applications. Festschrift for Dov Gabbay. Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medema, P., W. Bronnenberg, H. Bunt, J. Landsbergen, W, Schoenmakers and E. van Utteren: 1975, ‘Phliqa1: ‘Multilevel semantics in question answering.’ American Journal of Computational Linguistics microfiche 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molla, D.: 1999, ‘Ontologically Promiscuous Flat Logical Forms for NLP’. In Proceedings 4 th International Workshop on Computational Semantics IWCS-4, Tilburg University, pp. 249–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muskens, R.: 2001, ‘Talking about Trees and Truth-Conditions.’ Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10: 417–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkal, M.: 1999, ‘On semantic underspecification.’ In H. Bunt & R. Muskens (eds.) Computing Meaning, Vol. 1. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 33–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulman, S.: 2000, ‘Bidirectional Contextual resolution.’ Computational Linguistics 26:4. 497–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyle, U.: 1993, ‘Dealing with Ambiguities by Underspecification’. Journal of Semantics 10 (2), 123–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyle, U.: 1996, ‘Co-indexing labelled DRSs to represent and reason with ambiguities’. In S. Peters and K. van Deemter, editors, Semantic Ambiguity and Underspecification. Stanford: CSLI, pp. 239–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scha, R.: 1981, ‘Distributive, collective and cumulative quantification’. In J. Groenendijk and M. Stokhof, editors, Formal methods in the study of language. Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiehlen, M., Bos, J. & Dorna, M.: 2000, ‘Verbmobil Interface Terms (VITs).’ In W. Wahlster (ed.) Verbmobil: Foundations of Speech-to-Speech Translation. Berlin: Springer, pp. 183–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, L.K. and F.J. Pelletier: 1982, ‘From English to Logic: Contextfree computation of conventional logical translation’. American Journal of Computational Linguistics 8 (1): 165–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, A. & S. Manandhar: 2001, ‘The Availability of Partial Scopings in an Underspecified Semantic Representation’. In H. Bunt, R. Muskens & E. Thijsse (eds.) Computing Meaning, Vol. 2 , Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 129–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, W.: 1978, ‘Semantics and quantification in question answering/. In M. Yovits (ed.) Advances in Computers. New York: Academic Press, pp. 2–64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Harry Bunt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Tilburg University, The Netherlands

    Harry Bunt  & Reinhard Muskens  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bunt, H. (2008). Semantic Underspecification: Which Technique For What Purpose?. In: Bunt, H., Muskens, R. (eds) Computing Meaning. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 83. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5958-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation