Advertisement

Matrix: Schematic Universals. How Many Minds Does a Bilingual Have?

Chapter

Keywords

Cognitive Science Linguistic Form Procedural Rule Ontological Level Language Universal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albertazzi, L. 1995. Il campo figurale della lingua. Esprimere, indicare, rappresentare. In Negrini, G. (ed.), Categorie, oggetti e strutture della conoscenza. Rome: CNR. 9–43.Google Scholar
  2. Albertazzi, L. 1999. The time of presentness. A chapter in positivistic and descriptive psychology. In Cattaruzza, S. (ed.), Vittorio Benussi, special issue of Axiomathes 10: 49–74.Google Scholar
  3. Albertazzi, L. 2000a. Which semantics. In Albertazzi, L. (ed.), Meaning and cognition. A multidisciplinary approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins Publishing Company. 1–24.Google Scholar
  4. Albertazzi, L. 2000b. Directions and perspective points in spatial perception. In Albertazzi, L. (ed.), Meaning and cognition. A multidisciplinary approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins Publishing Company. 123–143.Google Scholar
  5. Albertazzi, L. 2002a. Continua. In Albertazzi, L. (ed.), Unfolding perceptual continua. Amsterdam: Benjamins Publishing Company. 1–28.Google Scholar
  6. Albertazzi, L. 2002b. Towards a neoaristotelian theory of continua: Elements of an empirical geometry. In Albertazzi, L. (ed.), Unfolding perceptual continua. Amsterdam: Benjamins Publishing Company. 29–79.Google Scholar
  7. Albertazzi, L. 2002c. Kinetic structure and causatives. Axiomathes, 1: 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Albertazzi, L. 2003. From Kanizsa back to Benussi: Varieties of intentional reference. In Albertazzi L. (ed.), The Legacy of Gaetano Kanizsa, special issue of Axiomathes 13: 239–259.Google Scholar
  9. Albertazzi, L. 2004a. Deformazioni secondo regole. La grammatica del vedere. Paradigmi, 2004: 35–57.Google Scholar
  10. Albertazzi, L. 2004b. Stereokinetic shapes and their shadows. Perception, 33: 1437–1452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Albertazzi, L. 2005. Immanent realism. Berlin-New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Albertazzi, L. 2006a. Visual spaces. In Albertazzi, L. (ed.), Visual thought. The depictive space of the Mind. Amsterdam: Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  13. Albertazzi, L. 2006b. Das rein figurale. Gestalt Theory.Google Scholar
  14. Albertazzi, L. 2007, in press. Intentional presentations. At the roots of consciousness. In Jordan, S. (ed.), special issue of Journal of Consciousness Studies.Google Scholar
  15. Apel, K. 1963. Die Idee der Sprache in der Tradition des Humanismus von Dante bis Vico, Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
  16. Aprejsan, J. D. 1974. Lexical semantics. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Karoma.Google Scholar
  17. Arnheim, R. 1954. Art and visual perception. The psychology of the creative eye. Berkeley: The Regents of the University of California.Google Scholar
  18. Benussi, V. 1913. Die Psychologie der Zeitauffassung. Leipzig: Hölder.Google Scholar
  19. Benussi, V. 1922–1923. Introduzione alla psicologia sperimentale. Lezioni tenute nell’anno 1922–1923, typescript by Musatti, C. Fondo Benussi, Milan: Bicocca University.Google Scholar
  20. Berlin, B., and Kay, P. 1969. Basic color terms: their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  21. Bickerton, D. 1981. The roots of language. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Kaoma.Google Scholar
  22. Boethius, A. M. S. 1906. Anicii manlii severini boetii in isagogen porphyrii commenta. In corpus scriptorum ecclesiasticorum latinorum, Vindobonae-Lipsiae.Google Scholar
  23. Bonitz, H. 1853. Über die Kategorien des Aristoteles. Sitzungsberichte der Kais. Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien. Philos-hist.Klasse, Bd X, Heft 5: 623.Google Scholar
  24. Brentano, F. 1975. On the several senses of being in aristotle: Aristotle’s Metaphysics Z, 1.Translated by George, R. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Brentano, F. 1977. Die Abkehr vom Nichtrealen. (ed.), by Mayer-Hillebrand, F. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
  26. Brentano, F. 1988. Philosophical lectures on space, time and the continuum. (ed.), by Körner, S., and Chisholm, R. M. Croom London: Helm.Google Scholar
  27. Bühler, K. 1934. Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
  28. Bunge, M. 1980. The mind body problem. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  29. Chiu, L. H. 1972. A cross-cultural comparison of cognitive styles in Chinese and American children. International Journal of Psychology, 7: 235–242.Google Scholar
  30. Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on governing and binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Clark, E. V. 2004. How language acquisition builds on cognitive development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8: 472–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Clark, E. V. 2005. Semantic category in acquisition. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 102: 459–480.Google Scholar
  34. Clark, E. V., and Clark H. H. 1979. When nouns surface as verbs. Language, 55(4): 767–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Cooke, H.P., and Tredennick, T. (eds.). 1983. Categories: Aristotle. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Cornelius, H. 1900. Über Gestaltqualitäten. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie derSinnesorgane, 22: 101–121.Google Scholar
  37. De Groot, A. M. B. 2002. On the source and nature of semantic and conceptual knowledge. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3: 7–9.Google Scholar
  38. De Groot, A. M. B., and Kroll, J. F. (eds.), 1997. Tutorials in bilingualism: psycholinguistic perspectives. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  39. Desclés, J.-P. 1993. Dialogue sur le prototypes et la typicalité. In Denis, M., and Sabah, G. (eds.), Modèles et Concepts pour la Science Cognitive. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble. 139–163.Google Scholar
  40. Eco, U. 1997. Kant e l’ornitorinco. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
  41. Eco, U. 2003. Dire quasi la stessa cosa. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
  42. Emmorey, K. 2004. Speech-sign bilingualism: How language modality affects bilingual language processing. Minneapolis, Minn. Psychonomic society, November.Google Scholar
  43. Fodor, J. 1975. The language of thought. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Formigari, L. 2002. A history of language philosophy. Amsterdam: Benjamins publishing company.Google Scholar
  45. Fraisse, P. 1963. The psychology of time. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  46. Goldin-Meadow, S., Mylander, C., and Butcher, C. 1995. The resilience of combinatorial structure at the word level: Morphology is self styled gesture system. Cognition, 56: 195–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Green, D. W. 1998. Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1: 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Green, D. W., and Price, C. 2001. Functional imaging in the study of recovery patterns in bilingual aphasics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4: 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Greenberg, J. H. 2005. Language universals. De Gruyter: Berlin.Google Scholar
  50. Hakuta, K. 1986. The bilingual mind. Mirror of Language: The debate on bilingualism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  51. Hartmann, N. 1935. Zur Grundlegung der Ontologie. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  52. Heine, B. 1997. Cognitive foundations of grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Hintzman, D. L. 1986. “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93: 411–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Humboldt, W. von 1830–1835. Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechts.Google Scholar
  55. Husserl, E. 1970. Logical investigations. Translated by Findlay, J. N., and Kegan P. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Husserl, E. 1982. Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. Book 1: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. (ed.), by Kersten, F. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  57. Jackendoff, R. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  58. Jackendoff, R. 1992. Languages of the mind: Essays on mental representation. Cambdridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  59. James, W. 1950. Principles of psychology, 2 vols. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  60. Janet, N. 2001. One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  61. Kanizsa, G. 1991. Vedere e pensare. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  62. Kecskes, I., and Papp, T. 2000. Foreign Language and Mother Tongue. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  63. Kleiber, G. 1990. La sémantique du prototype. Catégories et sens lexical. Paris : PUF.Google Scholar
  64. Koffka, K. 1935. Principles of gestalt psychology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  65. Kroll, J. F., and De Groot A. M. B. 1997. Lexical and conceptual memory in the bilingual: Mapping form to meaning in two languages. In De Groot, A. M. B., and Kroll, J. F. (eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 169–199.Google Scholar
  66. Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  67. Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  68. Lakoff, G. 1990. The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 1: 39–74.Google Scholar
  69. Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: How the embodied mind challenges the western tradition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  70. Lakoff, G., and Gallese, V. in press. Brain and concepts. The role of sensory-motor system in reason and language. Cognitive Neuropsychology.Google Scholar
  71. Lamb, S. 1999. Pathways of the Brain. Amsterdam: Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  72. Langacker, R. 1990. Concept, image and symbol. The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  73. Levinson, S. C. 2003. Space in language and cognition. Cambridge, Mass: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Lipps, T. 1897. Raumaesthetik und geometrisch-optische Täuschungen. Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
  75. Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics, Vols. I, II. Cambridge, Mass: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Mandler, J. 1992. How to build a baby: II Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review, 99: 587–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Martin, A. 2001. Functional neuroimaging of semantic memory. In Cabeza, R., and Kingstone, A. (eds.), Handbook of functional neuroimaging of cognition. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. 153–186.Google Scholar
  78. Marty, A. 1916–1920. Gesammelte schriften. (ed.), by Eisenmeyer, J., Kastil, A., and Kraus, O. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  79. Marty, A. 1976. Untersuchungen zur Grundlegung der allgemeinen Grammatik und Sprachphilosophie. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  80. Massironi, M., and Levorato, C. 1998. Formal characteristics in verbal description and spatial representation. In Albertazzi, L. (ed.), Shapes of forms. From phenomenology to gestalt psychology to ontology and mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 149–176.Google Scholar
  81. Metzger, W. 1941. Psychologie. Die Entwicklung ihrer Grundannahmen seit der Einführung des Experiments. Darmstadt: Steinkopf Verlag.Google Scholar
  82. Michotte, A. et al. 1962. Causalité, permanence et réalité phénoménales. Studia psychologica. Louvain: Publications Universitaires.Google Scholar
  83. Michotte, A. et al. 1963. The perception of causality. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  84. Miller, G. A., and Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1976. Language and perception. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Mishina-Mori, S. 2005. Autonomous and interdependent development of two language systems in Japanese/English simultaneous bilinguals: Evidence from question formation. First Language, 25(3): 291–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Munro, D. 1985. In to Munro, D. (ed.), Individualism and holism: Studies in confucian and taoist values, Ann Arbor: Center for Chinese Studies: University of Michigan. 1–34.Google Scholar
  87. Musatti, C. L. 1964. Condizioni dell’esperienza e fondazione della psicologia. Florence: Editrice Universitaria.Google Scholar
  88. Neisser, U. 1978. Concept and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization. Cambridge Mass: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Nilipour, R., and Ashayeri, H. 1989. Alternating antagonism between two languages with successive recovery of a third in a trilingual aphasic patient. Brain and Language, 36: 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Nisbett, R. E. 2003. The geography of thought. How Asians and Westerners think differently...and why. London: Nicholas Brealy Publishing.Google Scholar
  91. Noguchi, M. G., and Fotos, S. 2000. Studies in japanese bilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  92. Norenzayan, A., Choi, I., and Nisbett, R. E. 2002. Cultural similarities and differences in social inference: Evidence from behavioural predictions and lay theories of behaviour. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28: 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Obler, L. K., Zatorre, R. J., and Galloway, L. 2000. Cerebral lateralization in bilinguals: methodological issues. In Wei, L. The bilingualism reader. London-New York: Routledge. 381–394.Google Scholar
  94. Ockham, W. 1974. Summa logicae. (ed.), by Ph. Boehner et al. In Opera philosophica. New York: Editiones Instituti Franciscani S. Bonaventurae.Google Scholar
  95. Panaccio, C. 2005. Nominalism and the theory of concepts. In Cohen, H., and Lefebre, C. Handbook of categorization in cognitive science. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 993–1008.Google Scholar
  96. Paradis, M. 1997. The cognitive neuropsychology of bilingualism. In De Groot, A. M. B., and Kroll, J. F. (eds.), Tutorials in Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 331–354.Google Scholar
  97. Paradis, M., and Goldblum, M. 1989. Selective crossed aphasia in a trilingual aphasic patient followed by reciprocal antagonism. Brain and language, 36: 62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Pavlenko, A. 1999. New approaches to concepts in bilingual memory. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2: 209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Pinker, S. 1994. The language instinct. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
  100. Poli, R. 2002. Che cos’è l’universale?. In Boniolo, G., and Vidali, P. (eds.), Argomentare Corso di filosofia, 2. Milan: Bruno Mondatori. 86–91.Google Scholar
  101. Pöppel, E. 1994. Temporal mechanism in perception. International review of neuro-biology, 37: 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Pöppel, E., and Logothetis, N. 1986. Neuronal oscillations in the brain. Discontinuous initiators of pursuit eye movements indicate a 30Hz temporal framework for visual information processing. Naturwissenschaften, 73: 267–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Prinz, J. J. 2005. The return of concept empiricism. In Cohen, H., and Lefebre, C. (eds.), Handbook of categorization in cognitive science. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 679–695.Google Scholar
  104. Pulvermüller, F. 1999. Words in the brain’s language. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 22: 253–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Putnam, H. 1975. The Innateness Hypothesis and Explanatory Models in Linguistics. In Mind, language and reality: Philosophical papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  106. Quine, W. van Orman. 1969. Ontological relativity and other essays. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  107. Regier, T., Kay, P., and Cook R. S. 2005. Focal colors are universal after all. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 102: 8386–8391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Roberts, P. M., and Le Dorze, G. 1998. Bilingual aphasia: Semantic organization, strategy use, and productivity in semantic verbal fluency. Brain and Language, 65: 287–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Rosch, E. 1978. Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  110. Sasanuma, S., and Park, H. S. 1995. Patterns of language deficits in two Korean-Japanese bilingual aphasic patients. A clinical report. In Paradis, M. (ed.), Aspects of bilingual aphasia. Oxford: Pergamon Press. 111–122.Google Scholar
  111. Shin S. J., and Milroy, L. 2000. Conversational codeswitching among Korean-English bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism, Vol. 4(3)(1): 351–383(33).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Steinthal, H. 1968. Grammatik, logik und psychologie. Hildesheim-New York: Olms.Google Scholar
  113. Svorou, S. 1994. The grammar of space. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  114. Talmy, L. 1988. Force dynamics in language and thought. Cognitive Science, 12: 49–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Talmy, L. 1983. How language structures space. In Pick, H. L., and Acredolo, L. P. (eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research and application. New York: Plenum Press. 225–282.Google Scholar
  116. Traugott E. 1978. On the expression of spatio-temporal relationships in language. In Greenberg, J., Ferguson, C., and Moravcsik, E. (eds.), Universals of human language 3. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  117. Trendelenburg, F. A. 1833. De Aristotelis categoriis. Berolini.Google Scholar
  118. Treisman, A., and Gelade, G. 1980. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12: 97–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Ungerer, F., and Schmid, H. 1996. An introduction to cognitive linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  120. Violi, P. 1997. Significato ed esperienza. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
  121. Vicario, G. B. 1970. Tempo psicologico ed eventi. Florence: Giunti.Google Scholar
  122. Vygotsky, L. S. 1962. Thought and language. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  123. Viswanath, D. 2005. The epistemological status of computational vision and vision science and its implications for design. Axiomathes, 15(3): 399–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Wei, L. 1994. Three Generations Two Languages One Family: Language choice and language shift in a Chinese community in Britain. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  125. Weinrich, U. 1953. Language in contact. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  126. Wertheimer, M. 1938. Laws of organization in perceptual forms. In Ellis, W. E. (ed.), A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology, 71–94. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Wierzbicka, A. 1996. Semantic primes and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  128. Whorf, B. L. 1956. Language, thought and reality. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  129. Wundt, W. 1904. Die Sprache, 2 vols. Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
  130. Zeki, S. 1993. A vision of the brain. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
  131. Zeller, E. 1859–1868. Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichern Entwick-lung dargestellt, 5 vols.: Tübingen, 2nd rev. ed.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations