Skip to main content

Processing National CO2 Inventory Emissions Data and their Total Uncertainty Estimates

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Accounting for Climate Change

Abstract

The uncertainty of reported greenhouse gases emission inventories obtained by the aggregation of partial emissions from all sources and estimated to date for several countries is very high in comparison with the countries’ emissions limitation and reduction commitments under the Kyoto Protocol. Independent calculation of the estimates could confirm or question the undertainty estimates values obtained thus far. One of the aims of this paper is to propose statistical signal processing methods to enable calculation of the inventory variances. The annual reported emissions are used and temporal smoothness of the emissions curve is assumed. The methods considered are: a spline-function-smoothing procedure; a time-varying parameter model; and the geometric Brownian motion model. These are validated on historical observations of the CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion. The estimates of variances obtained are in a similar range to those obtained from national inventories using TIER1 or TIER2. Additionally, some regularities in the observed curves were noticed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brandes, L. J., Olivier, J. C. J., & van Oorschot, M. H. P. (2004). Validation, verification and uncertainty assessment for improving The Netherlands’ emission inventory. In Proceedings of the workshop ‘Uncertainty in Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Verification, Compliance & Trading.’ (pp. 19–33). Warsaw, Poland: SRI PAS & IIASA. http://www.ibspan.waw.pl/papers/Brandes.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debnath, L. (2002). Wavelet transforms and their applications. Switzerland: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • FCCC (1998). FCCC report of the conference of the parties on its third session, held at Kyoto from 1 to 11 December 1997. Addendum. Document FCCC/CP/1997/7/Add.1, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (FCCC). http://www.unfccc.de/http://unfccc.int/index.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • FCCC (2001). Implementation of the Buenos Aires plan of action: adoption of the decisions giving effect to the Bonn agreements. Draft decisions forwarded for elaboration, completion and adoption. National systems, adjustments and guidelines under Articles 5, 7 and 8 of the Kyoto Protocol. Document FCCC/CP/2001/L.18, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (FCCC). http://www.unfccc.de/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillenwater, M., Sussman, F., & Cohen, J. (2007). Practical applications of uncertainty analysis for national greenhouse gas inventories (this issue).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, C. (2002). Smoothing spline ANOVA models. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gugele, B., Huttunen, K., & Ritter, M. (2005). Annual European community greenhouse gas inventory 1990–2003 and inventory report 2005. Technical report no. 4/2005. Copenhagen, Denmark: European Environment Agency. http://reports.eea.europa.eu/technical_report_2005_4/en.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, J., Oltshoorn, X., & Rotenberg, E. (2003). The role of scientific uncertainty in compliance with the Kyoto Protocol to the climate change convention. Environmental Science and Policy, 6, 475–486.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hudz, H. (2003). Verification times underlying the Kyoto Protocol: Consideration of risk. Interim report IP-02-066. Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA).

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (1996). IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, vol. 1–3. London: IPCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2000). Good practice guidance and uncertainty management in national greenhouse gas inventories. In J. Penman, D. Kruger, I. Galbally, T. Hiraishi, B. Nyenzi, S. Emmanuel, L. Buendia, R. Hoppaus, T. Martinsen, J. Meijer, K. Miwa, & K. Tanabe (Eds.), Intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC) National gas inventories program. Technical support unit. Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, M., & Nilsson, S. (2007). Prior to an economic treatment of emissions and their uncertainties under the Kyoto Protocol: scientific uncertainties that must be kept in mind (this issue).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeze, C., Vlasblom, J., Gupta, J., Boudri, C., & Blok, K. (2004). The power sector in China and India: greenhouse gas emission potential and scenarios for 1990–2020. Energy Policy, 32, 55–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manne, A., & Richels, R. (2004). US rejection of the Kyoto Protocol: the impact on compliance cost and CO2 emissions. Energy Policy, 32, 447–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marland, G., Boden, T. A., & Andres, R. J. (2006). Global, regional, and national fossil fuel CO2 emissions. In Trends: A compendium of data on global change, carbon dioxide information analysis center. OAK Ridge National Laboratory: U.S. Department of Energy. http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/trends/emis/em_cont.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monni, S., Syri, S., Pipatti, R., & Savolainen, I. (2007). Extension of EU emissions trading scheme to other sectors and gases: consequences for uncertainty of total tradable amount (this issue).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahorski, Z., Jeda, W., & Jonas, M. (2003). Coping with uncertainty in verification of the Kyoto obligations. In J. Studziński, L. Drelichowski, & O. Hryniewicz (Eds.), Zastosowania informatyki i analizy systemowej w zarzadzaniu, (pp. 305–317). Warsaw, Poland: IBS PAN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, S., Jonas, M., Obersteiner, M., & Victor, D. (2001). Verification: the gorilla in the struggle to slow global warming. Forestry Chronicle, 77, 475–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, S., Jonas, M., & Obersteiner, M. (2002). COP 6: a healing shock. Climatic Change, 52, 25–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riahi, K., Rubin, E. S., Taylor, M. R., Schrattenholzer, L., & Houndshell, D. (2004). Technological learning for carbon capture and sequestration technologies. Energy Policy, 26, 539–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rypdal, K., & Winiwarter, W. (2001). Uncertainty in greenhouse gas emission inventories — evaluation, comparability and implications. Environmental Science and Policy, 4, 104–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahba, G. (1990). Spline models for observational data. Montpelier, VT, USA: Capital City Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, G. G. (1994). Wavelets and other orthogonal systems with applications. CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winiwarter, W. (2007). National greenhouse gas inventories: understanding uncertainties versus potential for improving reliability (this issue).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nahorski, Z., Jęda, W. (2007). Processing National CO2 Inventory Emissions Data and their Total Uncertainty Estimates. In: Lieberman, D., Jonas, M., Nahorski, Z., Nilsson, S. (eds) Accounting for Climate Change. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5930-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics