Advertisement

Governance – A Political Science Perspective

  • Arthur Benz
  • Stefan Kuhlmann
  • Dieter Sadowski

Keywords

Collective Action Private Actor Negotiation System Rule System Policy Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Ia. Governance in Connected Arenas – Political Science Analysis of Coordination and Control in Complex Rule Systems

  1. Atkinson, M.M. / W.D. Coleman, 1992: Policy Networks, Policy Communities and the Problem of Governance, in: Governance 5, 154–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandemer, S., 2001: Benchmarking, in: Blanke, B. et al. (eds.), Handbuch der Verwaltungsreform, Opladen, Leske + Budrich, 2nd. ed., 406–414.Google Scholar
  3. Benz, A., 1998: Postparlamentarische Demokratie? Demokratische Legitimation im kooperativen Staat, in: Greven, M.Th. (ed.), Demokratie – Eine Kultur des Westens?, Opladen, Leske + Budrich, 201–222.Google Scholar
  4. Benz, A., 2003: Konstruktive Vetospieler in Mehrebenensystemen, in: Mayntz, R. / W. Streeck (eds.), Die Reformierbarkeit der Demokratie. Innovationen und Blockaden, Frankfurt, New York, Campus, 205–236.Google Scholar
  5. Benz, A., 2004a: Leistungswettbewerbe in der regionalen Raumentwicklungspolitik, in: DISP Dokumente und Informationen zur Schweizerischen Orts-, Regional- und Landesplanung, Zürich, 4–10; (DISP-online http://www.nsl.ethz.ch/index.php/de/content/view/full/875/).
  6. Benz, A., 2004b: Path-dependent Institutions and Strategic Veto-Players. National Parliaments in the European Union, in: West European Politics 29(5), 875–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunsire, A., 1996: Tipping the balance. autopoiesis and governance, in: Administration and Society 28(3), 299–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elster, J., 1989: Solomonic Judgements, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Haas, P.M., 1992: Introduction. Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination, in: International Organization 1(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hedstrom, P. / R. Swedberg (eds.), 1998: Social Mechanisms. An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Héritier, A., 1999: Policy-Making and Diversity in Europe. Escaping Deadlock, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Héritier, A., 2002a: Introduction, in: Héritier, A. (ed.), Common Goods. Reinventing European and International Governance, Lanham, Rowman and Littlefield, 1–12.Google Scholar
  13. Héritier, A., 2002b: New Modes of Governance in Europe: Policy-Making without Legislating, in: idem (ed.), Common Goods. Reinventing European and International Governance, Lanham, Rowman and Littlefield, 185–206.Google Scholar
  14. Hodson, D. / I. Maher, 2001: The Open Method as a New Mode of Governance. The Case of Soft Economic Policy Coordination, in: Journal of Common Market Studies 39, 719–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jansen, D., 1999: Einführung in die Netzwerkanalyse. Grundlagen, Methoden, Anwendungen, Opladen, Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
  16. Jessop, B., 1998: The Rise of Governance and the Risks of Failure. the Case of Economic Development, in: International Social Science Journal, 155, 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jessop, B., 2002: The Future of the Capitalist State, Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kohler-Koch, B. / R. Eising (eds.), 1999: The Transformation of Governance in the European Union, London, New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. König, K. / N. Dose, 1993: Instrumente und Formen staatlichen Handelns, Köln et al., Heymanns.Google Scholar
  20. Kooiman, J., 2002: Governance. A Socio-Political Perspective, in: Grote, J.R. / B. Gbikpi (eds.), Participatory Governance. Political and Societal Implications, Opladen, Leske + Budrich, 71–96.Google Scholar
  21. Kuhlmann, S., 2003: Benchmarking auf dem Prüfstand. Kosten, Nutzen und Wirkungen interkommunaler Leistungsvergleiche in Deutschland, in: Verwaltungsarchiv 94, 99–126.Google Scholar
  22. Lange, S. / U. Schimank, 2004: Einführung, in: Lange, S. / U. Schimank (eds.), Governance und gesellschaftliche Integration, Wiesbaden, Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 9–44.Google Scholar
  23. Lehmbruch, G., 1999: Verhandlungsdemokratie, Entscheidungsblockaden und Arenenverflechtung, in: Merkel, W. / A. Busch (eds.), Demokratie in Ost und West, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 402–424.Google Scholar
  24. Lehmbruch, G., 2000: Parteienwettbewerb im Bundesstaat. Regelsysteme und Spannungslagen im Institutionengefüge der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 3rd edition.Google Scholar
  25. Lütz, S., 2003: Governance in der politischen Ökonomie – zum Stand der Debatte, in: Politische Vierteljahresschrift 44, 231–243.Google Scholar
  26. March, D. / R.W.A. Rhodes, 1992: Policy Networks in British Government, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  27. Mayntz, R., 1992: Interessenverbände und Gemeinwohl. Die Verbändestudie der Bertelsmann Stiftung, in: idem (ed.), Verbände zwischen Mitgliederinteressen und Gemeinwohl. Gütersloh, Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung, 11–35.Google Scholar
  28. Mayntz, R., 1998: New Challenges to Governance Theory. Jean Monnet Chair Paper 50, Robert Schuman Centre of the European University Institute, Florenz, European University Institute.Google Scholar
  29. Mayntz, R., 2002: Common Goods and Governance, in: Héritier, A. (ed.), Common Goods. Reinventing European and International Governance, Lanham, Rowman and Littlefield, 15–27.Google Scholar
  30. Mayntz, R., 2003: Zur Theoriefähigkeit makrosozialer Aussagen, in: idem (ed.), Akteure – Mechanismen – Modelle, Frankfurt / New York, Campus, 7–34.Google Scholar
  31. Mayntz, R. / F.W. Scharpf, 1995: Steuerung und Selbstorganisation in staatsnahen Sektoren, in: idem (eds .), Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung, Frankfurt a.M. / New York, Campus, 9–38.Google Scholar
  32. Miller, G.J. / T.M. Moe, 1986: The Positive Theory of Hierarchies, in: Weisberg, H. (ed.), Political Science. The Science of Politics, New York, Agathon Press, 167–198.Google Scholar
  33. Nullmeier, F., 2000: Politische Theorie des Sozialstaats, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  34. Offe, C. / H. Wiesenthal, 1980: Two Logics of Collective Action. Theoretical Notes on Social Class and Organizational Form, in: Political Power and Social Theory 1, 67–115.Google Scholar
  35. Pierre, J. (ed.), 2000: Debating Governance. Authority, Steering, and Democracy, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Pierre, J. / B.G. Peters, 2000: Governance, Politics and the State, London, MacMillan.Google Scholar
  37. Pierson, P., 2004: Politics in Time. History, Institutions and Social Analysis, Princeton, Oxford, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rhodes, R.A.W., 1997: Understanding Governance. Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability, Buckingham, Philadelphia, Open University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Rosenau, J.N., 1998: Governance and Democracy in a Globalizing World, in: Held, D. / A. McGrew (eds.), 2000: The Global Transformation Reader. An Introduction to the Globalization Debate, Cambridge, Blackwell, 181–190.Google Scholar
  40. Rosenau, J.N. / E.-O. Czempiel (eds.), 1992: Governance Without Government. Order and Change in World Politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Scharpf, F.W., 1988: The Joint-Decision-Trap. Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration, in: Public Administration 66, 239–278.Google Scholar
  42. Scharpf, F.W., 1997: Games Real Actors Play. Boulder / Col., Westview Press.Google Scholar
  43. Scharpf, F.W., 1999: Governing in Europe. Efficient and Democratic?, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Scharpf, F.W. / B. Reissert / F. Schnabel, 1976: Politikverflechtung. Theorie und Empirie des kooperativen Föderalismus in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Kronberg, Scriptor.Google Scholar
  45. Schuppert, G.F., 2000: Verwaltungswissenschaft, Baden-Baden, Nomos.Google Scholar
  46. Smismans, S., 2006: The Legitimacy of Functional Participation in European Risk Regulation: A Case Study of Occupational Health and Safety, in: Benz, A. / Y. Papadopoulis (eds.), Governance and Democracy. Comparing National, European and Transnational Experiences, London, Routledge, 115–137.Google Scholar
  47. Sørensen, E., 2002: Democratic Theory and Network Governance, in: Administrative Theory and Praxis 24(4), 693–720.Google Scholar
  48. Van Kersbergen, K. / F. van Waarden, 2004: “Governance” as a Bridge between Disciplines. Cross-disciplinary Inspiration Regarding Shifts in Governance and Problems of Governability, Accountability and Legitimacy, in: European Journal of Political Research 43, 143–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilks, S. / M. Wright, 1987: Conclusion: Comparing Government-Industry Relations: States, Sectors and Networks, in: idem (eds.), Comparative Government-Industry Relations, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 274–313.Google Scholar
  50. Wolf, K.-D., 2006: Private Actors and the Legitimacy of Governance Beyond the State Conceptional Outlines and Empirical Explorations, in: Benz, A. / Y. Papadopoulis (eds.), Governance and Democracy. Comparing National, European and Transnational Experiences, London, Routledge, 200–227.Google Scholar

Ib. Governance of Research – Nine Comments on Arthur Benz

  1. Benz, A., 2007: Governance in Connected Arenas. Political Science Analysis of Coordination and Control in Complex Rule Systems, Chapter A Ia in this volume.Google Scholar
  2. Braun, D. / M. Benninghoff, 2003: Policy Learning in Swiss Research Policy. The Case of the National Centres of Competence in Research, in: Research Policy 32(10), 1849–1863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Edler, J. / S. Kuhlmann, 2005: Towards One System? The European Research Area Initiative, the Integration of Research Systems and the Changing Leeway of National Policies, in: Technikfolgenabschätzung - Theorie und Praxis 14(1), 59–68.Google Scholar
  4. Heinze, T. / S. Kuhlmann, 2007: Analysis of Heterogeneous Collaboration in the German Research System with a Focus on Nanotechnology, Chapter B IV in this volume.Google Scholar
  5. Hemlin, S. / C.M. Allwood / B. Martin (eds.), 2004: Creative Knowledge Environment. The Influences on Creativity in Research and Innovation, Cheltenham, UK, Elgar.Google Scholar
  6. Hohn, H.W. / U. Schimank, 1990: Konflikte und Gleichgewichte im Forschungssystem. Akteurkonstellationen und Entwicklungspfade in der staatlich finanzierten außeruniversitären Forschung, Frankfurt/M., Campus.Google Scholar
  7. Hollingsworth, R., 2002: Research Organizations and Major Discoveries in Twenthieth-century Science. A Case of Excellence in Biomedical Research, Berlin, WZB Discussion Paper, 2–3.Google Scholar
  8. Kuhlmann, S., 2003: Evaluation as a Source of “Strategic Intelligence”, in: Shapira, Ph. / S. Kuhlmann (eds.), Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluation. Experiences from the United States and Europe, Cheltenham, UK, Elgar, 352–379.Google Scholar
  9. Kuhlmann, S., 2001: Governance of Innovation Policy in Europe. Three Scenarios, in: Research Policy 30, issue 6/01, 953–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mayntz, R. / F.W. Scharpf, 1995: Der Ansatz des akteurzentrierten Institutionalismus, in: idem (ed.), Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung, Frankfurt / New York, Campus, 39–72.Google Scholar
  11. Powell, W.W. / P.J. DiMaggio (eds.), 1991: The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago / London, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Scott, R., 1995: Institutions and Organizations, London, Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Von Blumenthal, J., 2005: Governance. Eine kritische Zwischenbilanz, in: Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 15(4), 1149–1180.Google Scholar

Ic. Comment – An Organizational Economics View

  1. Benz, A., 2007: Governance in Connected Arenas. Political Science Analysis of Coordination and Control in Complex Rule Systems, Chapter A Ia in this volume.Google Scholar
  2. Schimank, U. / B.M. Kehm / J. Enders, 1999: Institutional Mechanisms of Problem Processing of the German University System. Status Quo and New Developments, in: Braun, D. / F.-X. Merrien (eds.), Towards a New Model of Governance for Universities? A Comparative View, London et al., 179–194.Google Scholar
  3. Schneider, M. / D. Sadowski, 2004: Performancemanagement in der öffentlichen Verwaltung. Eine unlösbare Aufgabe?, in: Die Verwaltung 37, 377–399.Google Scholar
  4. Wittek, R., 2007: Governance from a Sociological Perspective, Chapter A IIIa in this volume.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arthur Benz
  • Stefan Kuhlmann
  • Dieter Sadowski

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations