Governance – A Political Science Perspective

  • Arthur Benz
  • Stefan Kuhlmann
  • Dieter Sadowski

Keywords

Europe Arena Boulder Meso Stake 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Ia. Governance in Connected Arenas – Political Science Analysis of Coordination and Control in Complex Rule Systems

  1. Atkinson, M.M. / W.D. Coleman, 1992: Policy Networks, Policy Communities and the Problem of Governance, in: Governance 5, 154–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandemer, S., 2001: Benchmarking, in: Blanke, B. et al. (eds.), Handbuch der Verwaltungsreform, Opladen, Leske + Budrich, 2nd. ed., 406–414.Google Scholar
  3. Benz, A., 1998: Postparlamentarische Demokratie? Demokratische Legitimation im kooperativen Staat, in: Greven, M.Th. (ed.), Demokratie – Eine Kultur des Westens?, Opladen, Leske + Budrich, 201–222.Google Scholar
  4. Benz, A., 2003: Konstruktive Vetospieler in Mehrebenensystemen, in: Mayntz, R. / W. Streeck (eds.), Die Reformierbarkeit der Demokratie. Innovationen und Blockaden, Frankfurt, New York, Campus, 205–236.Google Scholar
  5. Benz, A., 2004a: Leistungswettbewerbe in der regionalen Raumentwicklungspolitik, in: DISP Dokumente und Informationen zur Schweizerischen Orts-, Regional- und Landesplanung, Zürich, 4–10; (DISP-online http://www.nsl.ethz.ch/index.php/de/content/view/full/875/).
  6. Benz, A., 2004b: Path-dependent Institutions and Strategic Veto-Players. National Parliaments in the European Union, in: West European Politics 29(5), 875–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunsire, A., 1996: Tipping the balance. autopoiesis and governance, in: Administration and Society 28(3), 299–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elster, J., 1989: Solomonic Judgements, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Haas, P.M., 1992: Introduction. Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination, in: International Organization 1(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hedstrom, P. / R. Swedberg (eds.), 1998: Social Mechanisms. An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Héritier, A., 1999: Policy-Making and Diversity in Europe. Escaping Deadlock, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Héritier, A., 2002a: Introduction, in: Héritier, A. (ed.), Common Goods. Reinventing European and International Governance, Lanham, Rowman and Littlefield, 1–12.Google Scholar
  13. Héritier, A., 2002b: New Modes of Governance in Europe: Policy-Making without Legislating, in: idem (ed.), Common Goods. Reinventing European and International Governance, Lanham, Rowman and Littlefield, 185–206.Google Scholar
  14. Hodson, D. / I. Maher, 2001: The Open Method as a New Mode of Governance. The Case of Soft Economic Policy Coordination, in: Journal of Common Market Studies 39, 719–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jansen, D., 1999: Einführung in die Netzwerkanalyse. Grundlagen, Methoden, Anwendungen, Opladen, Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
  16. Jessop, B., 1998: The Rise of Governance and the Risks of Failure. the Case of Economic Development, in: International Social Science Journal, 155, 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jessop, B., 2002: The Future of the Capitalist State, Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kohler-Koch, B. / R. Eising (eds.), 1999: The Transformation of Governance in the European Union, London, New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. König, K. / N. Dose, 1993: Instrumente und Formen staatlichen Handelns, Köln et al., Heymanns.Google Scholar
  20. Kooiman, J., 2002: Governance. A Socio-Political Perspective, in: Grote, J.R. / B. Gbikpi (eds.), Participatory Governance. Political and Societal Implications, Opladen, Leske + Budrich, 71–96.Google Scholar
  21. Kuhlmann, S., 2003: Benchmarking auf dem Prüfstand. Kosten, Nutzen und Wirkungen interkommunaler Leistungsvergleiche in Deutschland, in: Verwaltungsarchiv 94, 99–126.Google Scholar
  22. Lange, S. / U. Schimank, 2004: Einführung, in: Lange, S. / U. Schimank (eds.), Governance und gesellschaftliche Integration, Wiesbaden, Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 9–44.Google Scholar
  23. Lehmbruch, G., 1999: Verhandlungsdemokratie, Entscheidungsblockaden und Arenenverflechtung, in: Merkel, W. / A. Busch (eds.), Demokratie in Ost und West, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 402–424.Google Scholar
  24. Lehmbruch, G., 2000: Parteienwettbewerb im Bundesstaat. Regelsysteme und Spannungslagen im Institutionengefüge der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 3rd edition.Google Scholar
  25. Lütz, S., 2003: Governance in der politischen Ökonomie – zum Stand der Debatte, in: Politische Vierteljahresschrift 44, 231–243.Google Scholar
  26. March, D. / R.W.A. Rhodes, 1992: Policy Networks in British Government, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  27. Mayntz, R., 1992: Interessenverbände und Gemeinwohl. Die Verbändestudie der Bertelsmann Stiftung, in: idem (ed.), Verbände zwischen Mitgliederinteressen und Gemeinwohl. Gütersloh, Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung, 11–35.Google Scholar
  28. Mayntz, R., 1998: New Challenges to Governance Theory. Jean Monnet Chair Paper 50, Robert Schuman Centre of the European University Institute, Florenz, European University Institute.Google Scholar
  29. Mayntz, R., 2002: Common Goods and Governance, in: Héritier, A. (ed.), Common Goods. Reinventing European and International Governance, Lanham, Rowman and Littlefield, 15–27.Google Scholar
  30. Mayntz, R., 2003: Zur Theoriefähigkeit makrosozialer Aussagen, in: idem (ed.), Akteure – Mechanismen – Modelle, Frankfurt / New York, Campus, 7–34.Google Scholar
  31. Mayntz, R. / F.W. Scharpf, 1995: Steuerung und Selbstorganisation in staatsnahen Sektoren, in: idem (eds .), Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung, Frankfurt a.M. / New York, Campus, 9–38.Google Scholar
  32. Miller, G.J. / T.M. Moe, 1986: The Positive Theory of Hierarchies, in: Weisberg, H. (ed.), Political Science. The Science of Politics, New York, Agathon Press, 167–198.Google Scholar
  33. Nullmeier, F., 2000: Politische Theorie des Sozialstaats, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  34. Offe, C. / H. Wiesenthal, 1980: Two Logics of Collective Action. Theoretical Notes on Social Class and Organizational Form, in: Political Power and Social Theory 1, 67–115.Google Scholar
  35. Pierre, J. (ed.), 2000: Debating Governance. Authority, Steering, and Democracy, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Pierre, J. / B.G. Peters, 2000: Governance, Politics and the State, London, MacMillan.Google Scholar
  37. Pierson, P., 2004: Politics in Time. History, Institutions and Social Analysis, Princeton, Oxford, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rhodes, R.A.W., 1997: Understanding Governance. Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability, Buckingham, Philadelphia, Open University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Rosenau, J.N., 1998: Governance and Democracy in a Globalizing World, in: Held, D. / A. McGrew (eds.), 2000: The Global Transformation Reader. An Introduction to the Globalization Debate, Cambridge, Blackwell, 181–190.Google Scholar
  40. Rosenau, J.N. / E.-O. Czempiel (eds.), 1992: Governance Without Government. Order and Change in World Politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Scharpf, F.W., 1988: The Joint-Decision-Trap. Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration, in: Public Administration 66, 239–278.Google Scholar
  42. Scharpf, F.W., 1997: Games Real Actors Play. Boulder / Col., Westview Press.Google Scholar
  43. Scharpf, F.W., 1999: Governing in Europe. Efficient and Democratic?, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Scharpf, F.W. / B. Reissert / F. Schnabel, 1976: Politikverflechtung. Theorie und Empirie des kooperativen Föderalismus in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Kronberg, Scriptor.Google Scholar
  45. Schuppert, G.F., 2000: Verwaltungswissenschaft, Baden-Baden, Nomos.Google Scholar
  46. Smismans, S., 2006: The Legitimacy of Functional Participation in European Risk Regulation: A Case Study of Occupational Health and Safety, in: Benz, A. / Y. Papadopoulis (eds.), Governance and Democracy. Comparing National, European and Transnational Experiences, London, Routledge, 115–137.Google Scholar
  47. Sørensen, E., 2002: Democratic Theory and Network Governance, in: Administrative Theory and Praxis 24(4), 693–720.Google Scholar
  48. Van Kersbergen, K. / F. van Waarden, 2004: “Governance” as a Bridge between Disciplines. Cross-disciplinary Inspiration Regarding Shifts in Governance and Problems of Governability, Accountability and Legitimacy, in: European Journal of Political Research 43, 143–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilks, S. / M. Wright, 1987: Conclusion: Comparing Government-Industry Relations: States, Sectors and Networks, in: idem (eds.), Comparative Government-Industry Relations, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 274–313.Google Scholar
  50. Wolf, K.-D., 2006: Private Actors and the Legitimacy of Governance Beyond the State Conceptional Outlines and Empirical Explorations, in: Benz, A. / Y. Papadopoulis (eds.), Governance and Democracy. Comparing National, European and Transnational Experiences, London, Routledge, 200–227.Google Scholar

Ib. Governance of Research – Nine Comments on Arthur Benz

  1. Benz, A., 2007: Governance in Connected Arenas. Political Science Analysis of Coordination and Control in Complex Rule Systems, Chapter A Ia in this volume.Google Scholar
  2. Braun, D. / M. Benninghoff, 2003: Policy Learning in Swiss Research Policy. The Case of the National Centres of Competence in Research, in: Research Policy 32(10), 1849–1863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Edler, J. / S. Kuhlmann, 2005: Towards One System? The European Research Area Initiative, the Integration of Research Systems and the Changing Leeway of National Policies, in: Technikfolgenabschätzung - Theorie und Praxis 14(1), 59–68.Google Scholar
  4. Heinze, T. / S. Kuhlmann, 2007: Analysis of Heterogeneous Collaboration in the German Research System with a Focus on Nanotechnology, Chapter B IV in this volume.Google Scholar
  5. Hemlin, S. / C.M. Allwood / B. Martin (eds.), 2004: Creative Knowledge Environment. The Influences on Creativity in Research and Innovation, Cheltenham, UK, Elgar.Google Scholar
  6. Hohn, H.W. / U. Schimank, 1990: Konflikte und Gleichgewichte im Forschungssystem. Akteurkonstellationen und Entwicklungspfade in der staatlich finanzierten außeruniversitären Forschung, Frankfurt/M., Campus.Google Scholar
  7. Hollingsworth, R., 2002: Research Organizations and Major Discoveries in Twenthieth-century Science. A Case of Excellence in Biomedical Research, Berlin, WZB Discussion Paper, 2–3.Google Scholar
  8. Kuhlmann, S., 2003: Evaluation as a Source of “Strategic Intelligence”, in: Shapira, Ph. / S. Kuhlmann (eds.), Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluation. Experiences from the United States and Europe, Cheltenham, UK, Elgar, 352–379.Google Scholar
  9. Kuhlmann, S., 2001: Governance of Innovation Policy in Europe. Three Scenarios, in: Research Policy 30, issue 6/01, 953–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mayntz, R. / F.W. Scharpf, 1995: Der Ansatz des akteurzentrierten Institutionalismus, in: idem (ed.), Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung, Frankfurt / New York, Campus, 39–72.Google Scholar
  11. Powell, W.W. / P.J. DiMaggio (eds.), 1991: The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago / London, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Scott, R., 1995: Institutions and Organizations, London, Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Von Blumenthal, J., 2005: Governance. Eine kritische Zwischenbilanz, in: Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 15(4), 1149–1180.Google Scholar

Ic. Comment – An Organizational Economics View

  1. Benz, A., 2007: Governance in Connected Arenas. Political Science Analysis of Coordination and Control in Complex Rule Systems, Chapter A Ia in this volume.Google Scholar
  2. Schimank, U. / B.M. Kehm / J. Enders, 1999: Institutional Mechanisms of Problem Processing of the German University System. Status Quo and New Developments, in: Braun, D. / F.-X. Merrien (eds.), Towards a New Model of Governance for Universities? A Comparative View, London et al., 179–194.Google Scholar
  3. Schneider, M. / D. Sadowski, 2004: Performancemanagement in der öffentlichen Verwaltung. Eine unlösbare Aufgabe?, in: Die Verwaltung 37, 377–399.Google Scholar
  4. Wittek, R., 2007: Governance from a Sociological Perspective, Chapter A IIIa in this volume.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arthur Benz
  • Stefan Kuhlmann
  • Dieter Sadowski

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations