Keywords
- World Trade Organization
- Trips Agreement
- Population Genetic Research
- Human Genetic Resource
- Health Sector Database
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderlik MR (2004) Commercial biobanks and genetic research: banking without checks? In: Knoppers BM (ed) Populations and genetics: legal and socio-ethical perspectives. Martinus Nijhoff, Boston
Andersen B, Arnason E (1999, June 5) Icelands’s database is ethically questionable. BMJ 318:1565
Andrews L, Nelkin D (2001) Body bazaar: the market for human tissue in the biotechnology age. Crown Publishers, New York
Annas G J (1993) Privacy rules for DNA databanks: protecting coded ‘‘future diaries. JAMA 270(19):2346–2350
Anonymous (1995, July 15) Western eyes on China’s eugenics law. Lancet 346(8968):131
Austin MA, Harding S, McElroy C (2003) Genebanks: a comparison of eight proposed international genetic databases. Community Genetics, Community Genet 6(1):37–45
Barton JH (1997) Patents and antitrust: a rethinking in light of patent breadth and sequential innovation Antitrust Law Journal, Anti LJ 65(2):449–466
Baslar K (1998) The concept of the common heritage of mankind. : Martinum Nijhoff Publishers, Boston
Bekelman JE, Lie Y, Gross CP (2003) Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review JAMA 289:454
Benatar SR, Daar AS, Singer PA (2003) Global health ethics: the rationale for mutual caring. International Affairs 79(1):107–138, at 109 citing Singer PA, Daar AS (2001, October 5) Harnessing genomics and biotechnology to improve global health equity. Science 294:87–89
Berg K (2001) The ethics of benefit-sharing. Clin Genet 59(4):240–243
Berger A (1999, January 2) Private company wins right to icelandic database. BMJ 318(7175):11
Beskow LM et al (2001) Informed consent for population-based research involving genetics. JAMA 286(18):2315–2321
Biobank UK. Draft Protocol, available online: BioBank UK < http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/documents/ draft_protocol.pdf
Blumenthal D (1996, December) Ethics issues in academic-industry relationships. Academic Medicine 71:1291–1296
Business Week (2002, April1 5) Balancing privacy and Biotechnology. Editorial Business Week
Cardinal G, Deschenes M (2004) Surveying the population biobankers. In: Knoppers BM (ed) Populations and genetics: legal and socio-ethical perspectives. Martinus Nijhoff, Boston, pp 37–94
CARTaGENE: http://www.cartagene.qc.ca/
Cassese A (1990) International law in a divided world. Clarendon, Oxfordat 391
Caulfield TA et al (2003) Genetic technologies, health care policy and the patent bargain. Clin Genet 63(1):15–18
Caulfield T (2002) Gene banks and blanket consent. Nat Rev Genet 3(8):577
Chakravarti A (1999) Population genetics – making sense out of sequence. Nat Genet 21(Suppl.) 56
Charter of the United Nations (1945, June 26) Can. T.S. 1945 No. 7.
Cho MK et al (2003) Effects of patents and licenses on the provision of clinical genetic testing services. J Mol Diagn 5(1):3–8
Collins FS, Green ED, Guttmacher AE (2003) A vision for the future of genomics research. Nature 422(6934):835–847
Commission on Intellectual Property Rights (2002) Integrating intellectual property rights and development policy. CIPR, London at 11 citing Mansfield E (1986) Patents and Innovation. Manage Sci 32(2):173–181
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (1992, June 5) 31 I.L.M. 818
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) (2002) International ethical guidelines for Biomedical research involving human subjects. CIOMS, Geneva.online: CIOMS < www.cioms.ch/frame_guidelines_nov_2002>
Council of Europe (1997, April 4) Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (CHRBM). ETS No. 164
Council of Europe (2003) Steering committee on bioethics, draft additional protocol to the convention on human rights and Biomedicine, on Biomedical Research, CDBI/INF 6
Dawson E et al (2002) A first-generation linkage disequilibrium map of human chromosome 22. Nature 418(6897):544–548.
deCODE Genetics, An Informed Consent for Participation in a Genetic Study of (name of Disease) online: deCODE Genetics <www.decode.com >%deCODE Genetics’ website, online: % <http://www.DeCODEgenetics.com >
Department of Trade and Industry (2003, June) Government Response to ‘The work of the Medical Research Council’ Report by the House of Commons Science and Technology Select Committee (HC 132). online: UK Parliament 366. <www.ost.gov.uk/research/councils/govt_response_ to_select_committee_report_on_mrc.pdf >
Deschenes M et al (2001) Human genetics research DNA banking and consent: a question of ‘form’? Clin Genet 59(4):221–239
DNA Sciences ‘‘Welcome to the Gene Trust Project’’ online: DNA Sciences 366. <http://www.dna.com/ sectionHome/sectionHome_TheDNASciencesGeneTrustProject.asp>
DNA Sciences, Press release (2003a, April 1) Genaissance pharmaceuticals enters into agreement to acquire assets of DNA sciences. online: DNA Sciences www.dna.com/pressRelease/pressRelease. jsp?site=dna&link=20030331.htm
DNA Sciences, Press Release (2003b, May 12) Genaissance pharmaceuticals’ acquisition of substantially all of the assets of DNA sciences is approved. online: DNA Science <www.dna.com/ pressRelease/pressRelease.jsp?site=dna&link=20030512.htm>
Eisenberg RS (1992) Genes, patents and product development. Science 257(5072):903–908
Estonian Genome Project, available online: Eesti Geenivaramu <http://www.geenivaramu.ee/mp3/ trykisENG.pdf>at 5
Estonia, Human Genes Research Act (HGRA) RT I 2000, 104, 65, s.12 (entered into force 8 January 2001) online: Estonian Genome Project
Gana RL (1995) Has creativity died in the third world? some implications of the internationalization of intellectual property. Denver J Int Law Policy 24(1):109–144
Gandi I Address (Lecture presented to the World Health Assembly, 1982), cited in Gadbaw RM,Kenny LA, ‘‘India’’ in Intellectual Property Rights: Global Consensus, Global Conflict? Gadbaw RM, Richards TJ (eds) (1988) Westview Press, Boulder,)
GeneWatch UK (2002, November) Biobank UK – A Good Research Priority? Parliamentary Briefing No. 3. available online: GeneWatch <http://www.genewatch.org/HumanGen/Publications/ MP_Briefs.htm>
Gold ER (1996) Body parts: Property rights and the ownership of human biological materials. Georgetown University Press, Washington)
Gostin LO, Hodge JG (1999) Genetic privacy and the law: an end to genetic exceptionalism Jurimetrics 40(1):21–58
Greely HT (1997) The control of genetic research: involving the ‘groups between’ Hous L Rev 33:1397
Greely HT (2000) Iceland’s plan for genomics research: facts and implications. Jurimetrics 40(2):153–191
Habeck M (2002, October 17) Estonia jumps on the gene bank train. The Scientist (). online: The Scientist.com 366. <www.biomedcentral.com/news/20021017/08>
Haga SB, Khoury MJ, Burke W (2003) Genomic profiling to promote a healthy lifestyle: not ready for prime time. Nat Genet 34(4):347–350
Hamilton MA (1997) The TRIPs agreement: imperialistic, outdated, and overprotective. In: Moore AD (ed) Intellectual property: moral, legal and international dilemmas. Rowman & Littlefield, Boulder
Harrison CH (2002) Neither moore nor the market: alternative models for compensating contributors of human tissue. Am J Law Med 28(1):77–105
Harvard School of Public Health (2003, May 30) Conclusion of U.S. Government’s Inquiry into HSPH Genetic Research in China. available online: Harvard University <www.hsph.harvard.edu/ press/releases/pres05302003.html>
Hawkins D (2002, February 12)Keeping secrets. U.S. News & World Report
House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, ‘‘The Work of the Medical Research Council: Third Report of Session 2002–03’’ available online: UK Parliament <www.publications.parliament.uk/ pa/cm200203/cmselect/cmsctech/132/132.pdf >at 28
Human Genetics Commission (2002) Inside information: balancing interests in the use of personal genetic data. A Summary Report by the Human Genetics Commission (2002, May). Available online: http://www.hgc.gov.uk/ UploadDocs/DocPub/Document/insideinformation_summary.pdf
Human Genome Organisation Ethics Committee (2000) HUGO Statement on Benefit-Sharing (SBS) Genome Digest 6:7–9
Human Genome Organisation Ethics Committee (1996) HUGO Statement on the Principled Conduct of Genetic Research (PCGR) Genome Digest 3:2–3
Iceland Act on a Health Sector Database, no.139/1998 (Passed by Parliament 123rd Sess., 1998–99). Article 2 Iceland, Ministry of Health and Social Security <http://www.raduneyti.is/interpro/htr/ htr.nsf/pages/lawsandregs>>
Iceland Act on Biobanks, no.110/2000. Both Acts are available online: Iceland, Ministry of Health and Social Security <http://www.raduneyti.is/interpro/htr/htr.nsf/pages/lawsandregs>
Juengst ET (1998) Group identity and human diversity: keeping biology straight from culture. Am J Hum Genet 63(3):673–677
Kaiser J (2003) African-American population biobank proposed. Science 300(5625):1485
Kaiser J (2002) Population databases boom, from Iceland to the U.S. Science 298(5596):1158–1161
Knoppers BM et al (2000) ‘‘HUGO Urges Genetic Benefit-Sharing’’. Community Genet 3(2):88–92
Knoppers BM (2000[1997]) Population genetics and benefit sharing. Community Genet. 3(4):212–214
Knoppers BM (1999) Biotechnology: sovereignty and sharing. In: Caulfield TA, Williams-Jones B (eds) The commercialization of genetic research: ethical, legal and policy issues. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp 1–11
Knoppers BM (1991) Human dignity and genetic heritage. Law Reform Commission of Canada, Ottawa
Litman M, Robertson G (1996) The common law status of genetic material. In: Knoppers BM (ed) Legal rights and human genetic material. Emond Montgomery Publications Ltd., Toronto, pp 51–81
Lowrance WW (2001) The promise of human genetic databases: high ethical as well as scientific standards are needed BMJ 322(7293):1009–1010
Markel H (1992) The stigma of disease: implications of genetic screening Am J Med 93:209
Marshall E (2001) Company plans to bank human DNA profiles Science 291(5504):575
Mathew C (2001) Postgenomic technologies: hunting the genes for common disorders. BMJ 322(7293):1031–1034
McClellan MB (2003, June 23) Lecture, BIO 2003, Washington DC. available online: BIO 2003 <http://www.bio.org/events/2003/media/mcclellan_0623.asp>
McInnis MG (1999) The assent of a nation: genethics and Iceland. Clinical Genetics 55(4):234–239
Merges RP, Nelson RR (1990) On the complex economics of patent scope Colum L Rev 90:839
Meslin EM (2002) Raising the bar in research ethics: traditional obligations are not enough. Postgraduate Medicine 112:5
National Human Genome Center, Genomic Research in the African Diaspora (GRAD) <www.genomecentre.howard.edu/grad.html>
Network of Applied Genetic Medicine of Quebec (FRSQ), ‘‘Cartagene in Brief’’ available online: RMGA www.rmga.qc.ca
Participants in the 2001 Conference on Ethical Aspects of Research in Developing Countries (2002) Fair benefits for research in developing countries. Science 298(5601):2133–2134
Pennisi E (1998) Brazil wants cut of its biological bounty. Science 279(5356):1445
Pomfret J, Nelson D (2000, December 20) In Rural China, a genetic mother lode. Washington Post, A1
Robertson JA (1999) Privacy issues in second stage genomics. Jurimetrics 40(1):59–76
Roshwald M (1958–59) The concept of human rights. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 19(3):354–379
Shiva V (1999, November) The real costs of globalization. (Lecture presented to The Parkland Institute’s 3rd Annual Conference, ‘‘The Corporation as Big Brother: Challenging the Privatization of Knowledge’’.) Edmonton, Alberta
Shiva V (1997)Biopiracy: the plunder of nature and knowledge. Between the Lines, Toronto
Sieghart P (1986) The lawful rights of mankind. Oxford University Press, New York:) at 42
Staples S (2000) Human resource: Newfoundland’s 300-year-old genetic legacy has triggered gold rush. Report on Business 17(3):117–120
Statistics Canada (2002b) A profile of spin-off firms in the biotechnology sector. Innovation Analysis Bulletin 4(1):12
Statistics Canada (2002a) Estimates of total expenditures on research and development in the health fields in Canada, 1988 to 2001. available online: Statistics Canada <www.statcan.ca/cgi-bin/downpub/listpub.cgi?catno=88F0006XIE2002007>
Szalavitz M (2001) Race and the genome. online: Howard University Human Genome Center <www.genomecenter.howard.edu/article.htm>
The Bonn Guidelines on Access to Genetic Resources and Fair and Equitable Sharing of the Benefits Arising out of their Utilization (2002) UN Doc UNEP/CBD/COP/6/20 online: Convention on Biological Diversity <www.biodiv.org/decisions/default.asp?m=cop-06&d=24>
The Gene Trust Bill of Rights online: DNA Sciences, <http://www.dna.com/sectionHome/ SectionHome.jsp?site=dna&link=The GeneTrustBillofRights.htm>
The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) (1966) G.A. Res. 2200, U.N. GAOR, 21st Sess., Supp. No. 16 at 49, U.N. Doc. A/6316; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), 19 December 1966, 999 U.N. T.S. 171, arts. 9–14, Can. T.S. 1976 No. 47, 6 I.L.M. 368
Trebilcock MJ, Iacobucci EM (2003) Privatization and accountability Harv Law Rev 116(5):1422–1453
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) (1997) Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights (UDHG), 29th Sess., 29 C/Resolution 19
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) (2003), International Declaration on Human Genetic Data, 32nd Sess., 32 C/29 Add.2. The text of the declaration as finalized by the working group of Commission III on 7 October 2003 is included as Section III of this document
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982) UN Doc. A/CONF.62/122 art. 136
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) (1948) GA Res. 217(III), UN GAOR, 3d Sess., Supp. No. 13, UN Doc. A/810
Varmus (2002) Harold building a global culture of science. Lancet 360(Suppl):1
Weijer C (2000) Benefit sharing and other protections for communities in genetic research. Clinical Geneti 58(5):367–368
Weijer C, Goldsand G, Emanuel EJ (1999) Protecting communities in research: current guidelines and limits of extrapolation. Nat Genet 23(3):275–280
Wertz DC, Fletcher JC (1998) Ethical and social issues in prenatal sex selection: a survey of geneticists in 37 nations. Soc Sci Med 46(2):255–273
Wertz DC (2002) Did eugenics ever die? Nat Rev Genet 3(6):408
World Health Organization (2002) Advisory Committee on Health Research, Genomics and World Health Organization World Health, Genomics and World Health. World Health Organization, Geneva)
World Trade Organization (Press Release), ‘‘Decision Removes Final Patent Obstacle to Cheap Drug Imports’’ 30 August 2003, online WTO: <www.wto.org/english/news_e/pres03_e/pr350_e.htm>
World Trade Organization Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health (Doha Statement), 2001, Doc. WT/MIN(01)/Dec/2, available online: http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_ e/min01_e/mindecl_trips_e.htm
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sheremeta, L., Knoppers, B.M. (2007). Beyond the Rhetoric: Population Genetics and Benefit-Sharing. In: Peter, W., Onwuekwe, C.B. (eds) Accessing and Sharing the Benefits of the Genomics Revolution. The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5822-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5822-6_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5821-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5822-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)