This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adams WA (2002) Intellectual property infringement in global networks: the implications of protection ahead of the curve. Int’l J L & Info Tech 10(1):71–131
Ad hoc open-ended working group on access and benefit-sharing (2003) Report of the ad hoc open-ended working group on access and benefit-sharing on the work of its second meeting. Online: Convention on Biological Diversity <http://www.biodiv.org/doc/meetings/cop/cop-07/official/cop-07-06-en.pdf>
Beitz C (1978) Political theory and international relations. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Chapman AR (2002) The human rights implications of intellectual property protection. J Int’l Econ L 5(4):861–882
Davidson D (1984) On the very idea of a conceptual scheme. In: Davidson D (ed) Inquiries into truth and interpretation. OUP, Oxford
de Ortuzar MG (2003) Towards a universal definition of ‘Benefit-Sharing’. In: Knoppers BM (ed) Populations and genetics: legal and socio-ethical perspectives. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Boston, pp 473–485
Downes D (1997) Using intellectual property as a tool to protect traditional knowledge: recommendations for the next steps. Centre for International Environmental Law, Washington
Downes DR (2000) How intellectual property could be a tool to protect traditional knowledge. Columbia J Envtl L 25(2): 253–281
Downes DR, Laird SA (1999) Innovative mechanisms for sharing benefits of biodiversity and related knowledge case studies on geographical indications and trademarks. Prepared for UNCTAD Biotrade Initiative, available online: <http://www.ciel.org/Publications/InnovativeMechanisms.pdf>
Drahos P (1996) A philosophy of intellectual property. Dartmouth Pub. Co., Hanover
Drahos P (2001) Indigenous knowledge, intellectual property and biopiracy: is a global bio-collecting society the answer? European Intellectual Property Review Eur Intellect Property Rev 6: 245–50
Gold ER, Caulfield TA (2003) Human genetic inventions, patenting and human rights. Report Commissioned by the Department of Justice, Government of Canada, p 46
Harding SG (1986) Science questions in feminism. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Hettinger EC (1989) Justifying intellectual property. Phil Pub Affairs 18(1): 31–52
Hughes J (1988) The philosophy of intellectual property. Geo L J 77(2):287–366
Human Genome Organisation (HUGO) (2000) Statement on benefit sharing. Vancouver, available online: HUGO <http://www.gene.ucl.ac.uk/hugo/benefit.html>
Juma C (1989) The gene hunter: biotechnology and the scramble for seeds. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Leskien D, Flitner M (June 1997) Intellectual property rights and plant genetic resources: options for a Sui Generis system. Issues in Genetic Resources 6: 42
Macpherson CB (1978) The meaning of property. In: Macpherson CB (ed) Property: mainstream and critical positions. University of Toronto Press, Toronto
Nijar GS (1996) In defence of indigenous knowledge and biodiversity: a conceptual framework and essential elements of a rights regime. Third World Network, Penang
Pogge T (1994) An egalitarian law of peoples. Phil Pub Affairs 23(3):195–224
Rawls J (1999a) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Rawls J (1999b) Law of peoples. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Sarma L (1999) Biopiracy: twentieth century imperialism in the form of international agreements. Temp Int’l & Comp L J 13(1):107–136
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2004) Access and Benefit-Sharing as Related to Genetic Resources. Decision VI/2, online: <http://www.biodiv.org/decisions/default.aspx?m=cop-06&d=24>
Shiva V (1997) Biopiracy: the plunder of nature and knowledge. South End Press, Boston
Shiva V (2000) Stolen harvest: the hijacking of the global food supply. South End Press, Cambridge, MA
Tobin B (1997) Know-how licenses: recognising indigenous rights over collective knowledge. Bulletin of the Working Group on Traditional Resource Rights 4:17–18
Trosow SE (2003) Fast-track trade authority and the free trade agreements: implications for copyright law. Can J L & Tech 2(2):135–149
UN Commission on Human Rights, High Commissioner (2001) The impact of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights on Human Rights. Geneva, at par 41.
Walterscheid EC (1994) The early evolution of the U.S. Patent Law: Antecedents (Part 2). Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society 76(11):849–880
World International Property Office (WIPO) (1999) Intellectual property needs and expectations AQ12 of traditional knowledge holders. %WIPO Report on Fact-Finding Missions 1998–1999, Geneva (Publication Number 768E).
World International Property Office (WIPO) (2002) Intergovernmental committee on intellectual property and genetic resources, traditional knowledge and folklore (May 20, 2002), Operational terms and definitions. Geneva, WIPO/GRTKF/IC/3/9, online: <http://www.wipo.int/ eng/meetings/2002/igc/pdf/grtkfic3_9.pdf>par. 25
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Castle, D., Gold, E.R. (2007). Traditional Knowledge and Benefit Sharing: From Compensation to Transaction. In: Peter, W., Onwuekwe, C.B. (eds) Accessing and Sharing the Benefits of the Genomics Revolution. The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5822-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5822-6_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5821-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5822-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)