Enabling Global Science Literacy for All

  • E. Barbara Klemm
Part of the Science & Technology Education Library book series (CTISE, volume 15)


Commitment to the inclusion of learners with disabilities is a necessary, integral part of making Global Science Learning “for all.” However, to do so requires two changes: transforming our thinking about individuals with disabilities from focus on their disabilities to focus on their abilities and modifying learning environments so that they are inclusive, enabling, and accessible for all learners.


National Science Education Standard Individual Education Plan Exceptional Child General Education Classroom Science Camp 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks fbr science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Banks, J. A. (2000). The social construction of difference and the quest for educational equality. In Brandt, R. E. (Ed.), ASCD Yearbook 2000 Education in a New Era, (pp. 21 - 46 ). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  3. Council for Exceptional Children. (1999). IEP Team Guide. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children (Author).Google Scholar
  4. Choate, J. (2000). Successful inclusive teaching. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  5. Daniels, S. M. (1990). The meaning of disabilities: Evolving concepts. Assistive Technology Quarterly, 1, 3.Google Scholar
  6. Eisenhower Southwest Consortium for the Improvement of Mathematics and Science Teaching. (1996). Putting numbers on performance. Classroom Compass, 2, 2.Google Scholar
  7. Individuals with Disability Act (IDEA) of 1990, Publ. L. No. 101-476; Reauthorized in 1997, Publ. L. No. 105 - 17.Google Scholar
  8. Johnson, D. W., and Johnson, R. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Kagan, S. (1993). Cooperative learning. San Juan Capistrano, CA: Kagan Cooperative Learning.Google Scholar
  10. Kameenui, E. J., and Simmons, D. C. (1999). Toward successful inclusion of students with disabilities: The architecture of instruction. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.Google Scholar
  11. Klemm, E. B. and Avery, Q. (1999). Linking reforms: Environmental education and special education. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the North American Association for Environmental Education. Cincinnati, OH.Google Scholar
  12. Klemm, E. B. (1999). Using Earth systems education in field settings for all students, including students with disabilities. Proceedings of the 1999 Annual Conference of the North American Association for Environmental Education. Cincinnati, OH.Google Scholar
  13. Klemm, E. B., Radtke, R. L., and Skouge, J. (2000). Inclusion of all students in fully accessible, technology-supported, field-based marine science camps: The ocean of potentiality project. In Clark, I. F., (Ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Geoscience Education: Vol. 1 (pp. 71 - 74 ). Sydney, Australia: Australian Geological Survey OrganisationGoogle Scholar
  14. Klemm, E. B., Skouge, J. R., Radtke, R. L., and Laszlo, J. R. ( 2000, Winter). Ocean of potentiality: Fully accessible science camps. Journal of Science Education Jar Students with Disabilities, 8, 22 - 29.Google Scholar
  15. Lee, O. (1999). Equity implications based on the conceptions of science achievement in major reform documents. Review of Educational Research, 69, 1, 83 - 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mastropieri, M. A., and Scruggs, T. E. (1992). Science for students with disabilities. Science Education, 62, 4, 377 - 411.Google Scholar
  17. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. (1998). Notice of proposed long-range plan for fiscal years 1999-2004. Federal Register, 63 (206), 57189 - 57219.Google Scholar
  18. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  19. North American Association for Environmental Education. (1998). Environmental education materials: GuidelinesJor excellence. Troy, OH: Author.Google Scholar
  20. North American Association for Environmental Education (1999). Excellence in environmental education: Guidelines for Learning (K-12). Rock Spring, GA: Author.Google Scholar
  21. Pipho, C. (2000). Goveming the American dream of universal public education. In R. S. Brandt, (Ed). ASCD Yeabook 2000: Education in a New Era (pp. 5 - 20 ). Reston, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  22. Rutherford, F. J., and A. Ahlgren. (1990). Science Jor all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Scruggs, T. E., and Mastropieri, M. A. (1993). Current approaches to science education: Implications for mainstream instruction of students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 14, 1 I, 15 - 24.Google Scholar
  24. Seelman, K. D. (1998). Change and challenge: The integration of the new paradigm of disability into research and practice. Paper presented at the National Council on Rehabilitation Conference. Vancouver, WA. Available: Scholar
  25. Siegel-Causey, E., McMoms, C., McGowen, S., and Sands-Buss, S. (1998). In junior high you take earth science. Teaching Exceptional Children, 31, 1, 66 - 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. U. S. Department of Education. (1998). 20th annual report to Congress on the implementation of IDEA. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services.Google Scholar
  27. Vaughn, S., Bos, C. S. and Schumm, J. S. (1997). Teaching mainstreamed, diverse, and at-risk students in the general education classroom. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  28. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Thought and action. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  29. Williams, B. (1999). Diversity and education for the 21st century. In D. D. Marsh (Ed.), ASCDGoogle Scholar
  30. Yearbook 1999: Preparing Our Schools for the 21st Century (pp. 45-64). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers. printed in the Netherlands. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Barbara Klemm
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Hawaii-ManoaUSA

Personalised recommendations