Skip to main content

Spatially-Explicit Population Models with Complex Decisions

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: NATO Security through Science Series ((NASTC))

Abstract

Many approaches exist for modeling the response of animals to environmental condition and change. Regardless of the model selected, uncertainty is a major component in the modeling of complex physical-biological relationships. Structured methods exist for handling uncertainty in these modeling studies, and can facilitate decision-making among stakeholders with differing values. We describe two different approaches for modeling population response to environmental pattern. Then, we propose a simple means for incorporating uncertainty into the modeling process using structured and transparent means. First, a model formula is selected and applied with a structured uncertainty analysis during parameterization. Second, Monte Carlo simulation is applied to propagate the uncertainties in the model outputs induced by the uncertain inputs. Finally, multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is applied to prioritize model forecasts (i.e., of the likely input conditions) according to perceived value, relevance, accuracy, and uncertainty. The structure discussed is simple and can be modified in many ways to meet the demands of a particular study. This paper provides (1) a brief look at alternatives for modeling animal populations and (2) how these types of models can be applied within a structured and transparent framework for handling uncertainty that saves time, money, and effort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott, C.A., Berry, M.W., Comiskey, E.J., Gross, L.J., and Luh, H.K. (1995) Computational Models of White-Tailed Deer in the Florida Everglades. UTK-CS. http://www.cs.utk.edu/~berry/-deer/deer.html

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akçakaya, H.R., Burgman, M.A., and Ginzburg, L.R. (1999) Applied Population Ecology: Principles and Computer Exercises using RAMAS EcoLab 2.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Akçakaya, H.R. (2001) Linking population-level risk assessment with landscape and habitat models. The Science of the Total Environment 274:283–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Allen, L.H., Ruddell, J.M., Ritter, G.J., Davis, F.E., and Yates, P. (1982) Land use effects on Taylor Creek water quality. Proceedings of Specialty Conference on Environmentally Sound Water and Soil Management, ASCE, Orlando, Florida, 20–23 July, 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson, J.J. (2002) An agent-based event driven foraging model. Natural Resource Modeling 15(1):55–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bottcher, A.B., Tremwel, T.K., and Campbell, K.L. (1995) Best management practices for water quality improvement in the Lake Okeechobee watershed. Ecological Engineering 5:341–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bousquet, F. and Page, C.L. (2004). Multi-agent simulations and ecosystem management: a review. Ecological Modelling 176:313–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cash, K.M., Adams, N.S., Hatton, T.W., Jones, E.C., and Rondorf, D.W. (2002) Three-Dimensional Fish Tracking to Evaluate the Operation of the Lower Granite Surface Bypass Collector and Behavioral Guidance Structure during 2000. Final Report prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey Columbia River Research Laboratory for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Walla Walla District, Walla Walla, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coughenour, M.B. (1993) Savanna-Landscape and Regional Ecosystem Model. Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dumont, B. and Hill, D. (2001) Multi-agent simulation of group foraging in sheep: effects of spatial memory, conspecific attraction and plot size. Ecological Modelling 14:201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dunning, J.B., Stewart, D.J., Danielson, D.J., Noon, B.R., Root, T.L., Lamberson, R.H., and Stevens E.E. (1995) Spatially explicit population models: current forms and future uses. Ecological Applications 5(1):3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (1991) Guidelines: Land Evaluation for Extensive Grazing. FAO Soils Bulletin 58. FAO, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ferber, J. (1999) Multi-Agent Systems: An Introduction to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fishman, G. S. (1996) Monte Carlo: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications: Springer Series in Operations Research. New York, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Flaig, E.G., and Reddy, K.R. (1995) Fate of phosphorus in the Lake Okeechobee watershed, Florida, USA: overview and recommendations. Ecological Engineering 5:127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Goodwin, R.A., Nestler, J.M., Loucks, D.P., and Chapman, R.S. (2001) Simulating mobile populations in aquatic ecosystems. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 127(6):386–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Goodwin, R.A., Nestler, J.M., Anderson, J.J., Weber, L.J., and Loucks, D.P. (2006) Forecasting 3-D fish movement behavior using a Eulerian-Lagrangian-agent method (ELAM). Ecological Modelling 192:197–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hanson, J.D., Baker, B.B., and Bourbon, R.M. (1992) SPUR II Model Description and User Guide: GPSR Technical Report No. 1. USDA-ARS, Great Plains Systems Research Unit, Ft. Collins, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hobbs, B. F., and Meier, P. (2000) Energy Decisions and the Environment: A Guide to the Use of Multicriteria Methods: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Vol. 28. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hobbs, N.T., and Swift, D.M. (1985) Estimates of habitat carrying capacity incorporating explicit nutritional constraints. Journal of Wildlife Management 49(3):814–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Iman, R. L., and Helton, J. C. (1988) An Investigation of Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Techniques for Computer-Models. Risk Analysis 8:71–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H. (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kiker, G.A., and Clark, D.J. (2001) The development of a Java based, object-oriented modeling system for simulation of southern African hydrology. ASAE Paper No. 01–2030.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kim, J. B., Hobbs, B. F., and Koonce, J. F. (2003). Multicriteria Bayesian Analysis of Lower Trophic Level Uncertainties and Value of Research in Lake Erie. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 9:1023–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Martinez C.J. (2006) Object-oriented hydrologic and water-quality model for high-water-table environments. Ph.D. Dissertation. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mathevet, R., Bousquet, F., Page, C.L., and Antona, M. (2003) Agent-based simulations of interactions between duck population, farming decisions and leasing of hunting rights in the Camargue (Southern France). Ecological Modelling 165:107–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Morgan, M.G., and Dowlatabadi, H. (1996) Learning from integrated assessment of climate change. Climatic Change 34:337–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Morgan, M.G., and Henrion, M. (1990) Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing With Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis, Cambridge University Press, New York, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Nestler, J.M., Goodwin, R.A., and Loucks, D.P. (2005) Coupling of engineering and biological models for ecosystem analysis. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 131(2):101–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nestler, J.M., Goodwin, R.A., Cole, T., Degan, D., and Dennerline, D. (2002) Simulating movement patterns of blueback herring in a stratified southern impoundment. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 131:55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. New, J.G., Fewkes, L.A., and Khan, A.N. (2001) Strike feeding behavior in the muskellunge, Esox masquinongy: contributions of the lateral line and visual sensory systems. Journal of Experimental Biology 204:1207–1221.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Noy-Meir, I. (1975) Stability of grazing systems: an application of predator-prey graphs. Journal of Ecology 65:459–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Parrish, J.K., and Edelstein-Keshet, L. (1999) Complexity, pattern, and evolutionary trade-offs in animal aggregation. Science 284:99–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Parsch, L.D., and Loewer, O.J. (1995) GRAZE Beef-Forage Simulation Model: User's Guide.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Reckhow, K.H. (1994) Importance of scientific uncertainty in decision-making. Environmental Management 18:161–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rowe, W.D. (1994) Understanding uncertainty. Risk Analysis 14(5):743–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Schulze RE. (1995) Hydrology and Agrohydrology: A text to accompany the ACRU 3.00 Agrohydrological Modelling System. WRC Report No. TT69/95. ACRU Report No.43.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sogard, S.M. and Olla, B.L. (1993) Effects of light, thermoclines and predator presence on vertical distribution and behavioral interactions of juvenile walleye pollock, Theragra chalcogramma Pallas. Journal of Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 167:179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Stafford Smith, D.M. (1988) Modeling: Three approaches to predicting how herbivore impact is distributed in rangelands. New Mexico. Agricultural Experiment Station Regular Research Report: 628:1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Topping, C.J., Hansen, T.S., Jensen, T.S., Jepsen, J.U., Nikolajsen, F., and Odderskaer, P. (2003) ALMaSS, an agent-based model for animals in temperate European landscapes. Ecological Modelling 167:65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. UF-IFAS (2002) Demonstration of water quality best management practices for beef cattle ranching in the Lake Okeechobee Basin. University Of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Yang, L. (2006) Coupled simulation modeling of flatwoods hydrology, nutrients and vegetation dynamics. Ph.D. Dissertation. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Goodwin, R.A., Pandey, V., Kiker, G.A., Kim, J.B. (2007). Spatially-Explicit Population Models with Complex Decisions. In: Linkov, I., Kiker, G.A., Wenning, R.J. (eds) Environmental Security in Harbors and Coastal Areas. NATO Security through Science Series. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5802-8_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics