Skip to main content

Abstract

Low soil fertility is one of the most important common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) productivity yield limiting factors in Eastern and Central Africa and cause substantial production losses. As a component of integrated soil fertility management strategy, a collaborative research was initiated to screen bean germplasms for their tolerance to the important edaphic stresses of the region, namely soil acidity, low available phosphorus and low nitrogen. A set of 300 breeding lines of major market classes seed types were evaluated at varying ecologies under moderate and non-stress conditions at different locations in five countries. Bean genotypes evaluated vary considerably in their yield under stress conditions. Several lines identified tolerant to individual stresses and gave yield advantage over previously selected tolerant varieties. A few lines, BZ 12894-C-1, AND 932-A-1, DRK 137-1, Nm 12806-2A were tolerant to all three stresses , while ARA 8-B-1, AFR 709-1, AFR 703-1 and AND 1055-1 are tolerant to low P and low pH, and RWK 10, ARA 8-5-1, and T 842-6F11-6A-1 tolerant to low N and low pH. It is concluded that bean genotypes with multiple tolerance to edaphic stresses will make it possible to improve bean yield on low fertility soils common on small scale farmers’ fields generally characterized by a complex constraints rather than a single stress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beebe S., Lynch J., Galwey N., Tohme J. and Ochoa I. 1997. A geographical approach to identify phosphorus-efficient genotypes among landraces and wild ancestors of common bean. Euphytica 95:325–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreschsel P., Steiner K.G. and Hagedorn F. 1996. A review of potential of improved fallow and green manure in Rwanda. Agroforestry Systems 33: 136–.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esilaba A.O., Byalebeka J.B., Nakiganda A., Mubiru S., Delve R.J., Ssali H. and Mbalule M. 2001. Integrated Nutrient Management strategies in Eastern Uganda. CIAT, Kampala. CIAT Africa Occasional Publication Series, No. 35. 71pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimani P., Buruchara R., Ampofo K., Pyndji M., Chirwa R. and Kirkby R. 2001. Breeding bean for smallholder farmers in Eastern, Central and Southern Africa: Constraints, Achievements and Potential. In Proceedings of PABRA Millennium Synthesis. Arusha, Tanzania, 28 May-1 June, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunze L. 1994. Screening for tolerance to aluminum toxicity in bean. In. Bean Improvement for Low Fertility in Soils Africa: Proceedings of a Working Group Meeting. Kampala, Uganda, 23-26 May 1994. Wortmann C.S. (Ed). Network on Bean Research in Africa. Workshop Series. No. 25. CIAT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunze L., Kimani P.M., Ndakidemi P., Rabary B., Rachier G.O., Ugen M.M. and Nabahungu L. 2002. Selection of bean lines tolerant to low soil fertility conditions in Africa. Bean Improvement Cooperative, BIC 45:182–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngongo M. and Lunze L. 2000. Espèces d’herbe dominante comme indice de la productivitĂ© de sol et de la reponse du haricot commun Ă  l’application du compost. African Crop Science J. 8 (3): 251–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Njingulula M. 2003. Etude de l’impact socio-Ă©conomique des variĂ©tĂ©s amĂ©liorĂ©es du haricot dans le système de culture paysan au Congo, RĂ©publique DĂ©mocratique. Proceedings of a Regional Workshop to Develop a Work Plan for Impact Assessment Studies and Monitoring and Evaluation. Kampala, Uganda. . PABRA, CIAT. pp 83–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachier G.O., Lunze L. and Kimani P.M. 2002. Selection of bean varieties tolerant to Low Soil Phosphorus at Kakamega, Kenya. Paper presented at Soil Fertility and Bean Improvement for low Fertility Soil (BILFA) Working Group Meeting at Awassa, Ethiopia, 11 November 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutunga V. 1997. Sols acides de la rĂ©gion d’altitude de la Crcireete Zaddotire-Nil (Rwanda): PotentialitĂ©s agricoles et forestiĂ©res. Lengo Publishers, Nairobi, 68pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S.P. 2001. Broadening the genetic base of common bean cultivars: a review. Crop Science 41: 1675–.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S.P., Teran H., Munoz C.G., Osorno J. M., Takegami J.C. and Thung M.D.T. 2003. Low Soil fertility Tolerance in Landraces and Improved Common bean genotypes. Crop Science 43(1): 110–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wortmann C.S., Lunze, L., Ochwoh V.A. and Lynch J.P. 1995. Bean improvement for low fertility soils in Africa. African Crop Science J. 3(4): 469–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wortmann C.S., Kirkby R.A., Aledu C.A. and Allen J.D. 1998. Atlas of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Production in Africa, CIAT Cali, Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lunze, L. et al. (2007). Bean Improvement for Low Soil Fertility Adaptation in Eastern and Central Africa. In: Bationo, A., Waswa, B., Kihara, J., Kimetu, J. (eds) Advances in Integrated Soil Fertility Management in sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5760-1_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics