A Worldly View of Worldview Metaphysics

  • Helen Lauer
Part of the Einstein Meets Magritte: An Interdisciplinary Reflection on Science, Nature, Art, Human Action and Society book series (EMMA, volume 10)

This essay critically analyses how the notion of contrasting worldviews is often used to explain and to suggest ways of improving upon the way people relate in light of the way they think about each other, about themselves, and the world at large. Such usages of the worldview metaphor occur routinely in contemporary philosophical, political and social scientific texts, as well as in everyday untutored discourse. It is notoriously difficult to trace even in rough outline the thought contents and the causal sequences that result in our exhibiting loyalty, or getting safely across a street, or justifying an ill-advised military invasion.1 The mental realm remains obscure. When we externalise beliefs and other mental states by using metaphors that invoke a shared framework or storehouse of beliefs, then the subjectively personal constituents of our intentions (the particular convictions, priorities, urges, perceptual beliefs, aspirations, motives that lead us to act as we do) no longer seem so mysterious as when they are couched in terms of the hidden workings of an inner realm. The picture of ‘contrasting worldviews’ vaguely connotes a variety of view points operating in concert, or simultaneously, or con-secutively.2 But unless this metaphor provides insight into how people really tick, talking about worldviews gives a false impression about the feasibility of understanding what is involved when people intentionally do things that other people regard as unthinkable. There are actions which bring a halt to people‘s willingness to empathise and understand a radically alien point of view. Talking about worldview structure, content and adjustability as such is misleading because our analytic focus is thereby shifted away from the specific conditions, historical episodes, and material circumstances which undermine people's mutual trust and feature somehow in the way people perceive their options. But the deficit inherent in this shift of focus cannot just be declared; it has to be shown. In order to focus on the kind of situation where mutual understanding has reached a complete impasse, the behaviour in focus throughout this essay will be the sort that gets called sectarian violence and ethnic conflict. This kind of fighting is regarded as different from the murderous activities which have been formally authorised, conscripted and supervised by a sovereign state.

In the next section, a distinction is drawn between two senses of ‘worldview’ that are normally conflated in the literature of political and social philosophy, international relations, anthropology, and analytic psychology. Subsequent sections discuss versions of a widely received hypothesis that the primary cause of sectarian strife of all types is lodged deep in the conflicting worldviews of the individuals embroiled in violence.3 As will be shown, it sometimes appears vacuous, and at other times simply mistaken, to diagnose the root cause of group antagonism as the logical consequence of certain fundamental beliefs (comprising a ‘group-’ or ‘social-’ or ‘ethnic identity’) – beliefs which lie at the core of the worldview shared by members of a particular group (Connor 1972; Honneth 1998, 2002; Horowitz 1998). This is followed by a review of problems with treating a worldview as an emerging property of a community, rather than as an attribute intrinsic to any particular individual. In conclusion we examine the plausibility of social engineering programmes to enhance national harmony by encouraging people to build better world-views (Connor 1972). For instance it has been argued that a mandate of good governance is to instil in a whole population the spirit of inclusiveness through enforcement of a single national language policy (Gyekye 1997).

Keywords

Migration Explosive Assimilation Posit Arena 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aerts, Diedrik, D'Hondt, Ellie and Gabora, Liane, 2000, ‘‘Why The Logical Disjunction in Quantum Logic Is Not Classical’, Center Leo Apostel, Brussels Free University, preprint manuscript, Foundations of Physics, http://cogprints.org/3415/01/or.pdf > Accessed 30/11/06
  2. Appiah, Kwame Anthony, 1991, ‘Racisms’, in The Anatomy of Racisms, David T. Goldberg (ed.), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 5–14.Google Scholar
  3. Ayer, A.J. (ed.), 1959, Logical Positivism, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Carnap, Rudolf, 1956, ‘Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology’, Meaning and Necessity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 205–221.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, Romane, 1980, ‘Not Every Act of Thought Has a Matching Proposition, in Midwest Studies in Philosophy Volume V: Studies in Epistemology, Peter A. French et al. (eds.), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 509–524.Google Scholar
  6. Collingwood, R.G. [1946] 1974, ‘Human Nature and Human History’, The Idea of History, reprinted in Philosophy of History; Patrick Gardiner (ed.), Oxford University Press, London, pp. 17–21.Google Scholar
  7. Connor, Walker, 1972, ‘Nation-Building or Nation-Destroying?; World Politics, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 319–355.Google Scholar
  8. Crehan, Kate, 1998, ‘A Vague Passion for a Vague Proletarian Culture: An Anthropologist Reads Gramsci’ The Philosophical Forum, vol. XXIX, no. 3–4, pp. 218–232.Google Scholar
  9. Crehan, Kate, 2002, Gramsci, Culture and Anthropology, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  10. Cutler, Claire A., 1999, ‘Locating ‘Authority’ in the Global Political Economy’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 43.1, pp. 59–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davidson, Donald [1963] 1980, ‘Actions, Reasons, and Causes’. Reprinted in Essays in Actions and Events, Clarendon, Oxford, pp. 3–16.Google Scholar
  12. Davidson, Donald, 1984, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Clarendon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Du Plessis, Anton, 2001, ‘Exploring the Concept of Identity and World Politics’, Politics of Identity and Exclusion in Africa: From Violent Confrontation to Peaceful Cooperation. Seminar Report no. 11: 13–25. Johannesburg: Konrad Adenhauer Foundation.Google Scholar
  14. Fodor, J. and LePore, E., 1992, Holism: A Shopper's Guide; Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Fodor, J. and LePore, E. (eds.), 1993, Holism: A Consumer Update, Grazer Philosophische Studien, vol. 46, Rodopi, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  16. Fodor, J. and LePore, E., 1994, ‘The Red Herring and the Pet Fish: Why Concepts Still Can’t Be Protoypes‘, < ruccs.rutgers.edu/ftp/pub/papers/herring17.wdb > Accessed 06/12/06.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, Michel, 1982, The Archaeology of Knowledge, Pantheon, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Fraser, Nancy, 1989, Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
  19. Foucault, Michel, 1982, The Archaeology of Knowledge, Pantheon, New York.Foucault, Michel, 1982, The Archaeology of Knowledge, Pantheon, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Gregory, Richard L., 1997, ‘Knowledge in Perception and Illusion’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, vol. 352, pp. 1121–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guibernau, Montserrat and Hutchinson, John, 2004, ‘History and National Destiny’, Nations and Nationalism, vol. 10, no.1, pp. 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gyekye, Kwame, 1997, Tradition and Modernity, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Harman, Gilbert, 1973, Thought, Princeton University Press, London.Google Scholar
  24. Harrison, Lawrence E. and Huntington, Samuel P. (eds.), 2000, Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Heylighen, F., 2000, ‘What is a world view?’ Principia Cybernetica Web http://pespmc1.vub. ac.be/PRMAT.html ucturedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hobbes, Thomas [1665] 1971, Leviathan and De Corpore excerpts in Materialism and the Mind Body Problem, David M. Rosenthal (ed.), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  27. Honneth, Alex, 1992, ‘Integrity and Disrespect: Principles of a Conception of Morality Based on the Theory of Recognition’, Political Theory, vol. 20, no.2, pp. 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Honneth, Alex, 2001, ‘Invisibility: The Epistemology of Recognition’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 75, no.1, pp. 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Horowitz, Donald L., 1998, ‘Structure and Strategy in Ethnic Conflict’, Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, Washington, DC, April 20–21.Google Scholar
  30. Huntington, Samuel P., 1993, ‘The Clash of Civilizations’, Foreign Affairs, vol. 72, no.2, pp. 22–28.Google Scholar
  31. Jung, Carl G., 1957, The Undiscovered Self, American Library, New York.Google Scholar
  32. LaFeber, Walter, 1984, Inevitable Revolutions: The United States in Central America, W . W . Norton, London.Google Scholar
  33. Lang, Serge, 1998, Challenges, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Lauer, Helen, 1992, ‘Grounding Causalist Assumptions in the Grammar of Action Sentences’, Philosophical Quarterly (Dublin), vol. 23, pp. 143–152.Google Scholar
  35. Lauer, Helen, 1996, ‘Treating Race as a Social Construction’, Journal of Value Inquiry, vol. 30, pp. 445–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lauer, Helen, 2002, ‘Knowledge on the Cusp’, in The Third Way in African Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Kwasi Wiredu, Olusegun Oladipo (ed.), Hope Publications, Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
  37. LePore, Ernest (ed.), 1986, Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson,Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  38. Lyotard, Jean-François, [1979] 1984, The Post-Modern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, transl. G. Bennington and B. Massumi, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
  39. MacIntyre, Alisdair, 1973, ‘The Essential Contestability of Some Social Concepts’, Ethics, vol. 84.1, pp. 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. MacIntyre, Alisdair, 1987, ‘Relativism, Power, and Philosophy’, in Philosophy: End or Transformation?Kenneth Baynes, James Bohman and Thomas McCarthy (eds.), MIT Press, MA, pp. 385–411.Google Scholar
  41. Mamdani, Mahmood, 2003, ‘Making Sense of Political Violence in Postcolonial Africa’, in Ghana in Africa and the World Today, Toyin Falola (ed.), Africa World Press, NJ, pp. 689–711.Google Scholar
  42. Note, Nicole, 2006, Précis of Worldviews and Cultures. Philosophical Reflections on Fundamental Intricate Issues, from an Intercultural Perspective, Nicole Note, Raùl Fornet-Betancourt, Josef Estermann and Diederik Aerts (eds.), Springer, Berlin, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  43. Parfit, Derek, 1984, Reasons and Persons, Clarendon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  44. Penrose, Roger, 1990, ‘Précis of The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds and the Laws of Physics, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 643–705.Google Scholar
  45. Pólya, G., 1954, Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning, vol. I: Induction and Analogy in Mathematics, Princeton University Press, NJ.Google Scholar
  46. Quine, W.V.O., 1953, From a Logical Point of View, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  47. Quine, W.V.O., 1960, Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  48. Quine, W.V.O., 1969, ‘Epistemology Naturalised’, Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  49. Quine, W.V.O. [1969] 1991, ‘Natural Kinds’, reprinted in Philosophy of Science, Richard Boyd, Philip Gasper and J.D. Trout (eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 159–170.Google Scholar
  50. Quine, W.V.O., 1970, ‘On the Reasons for the Indeterminacy of Translation’, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 67, pp. 178–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rosenthal, David M., 1983, ‘Reductionism and Knowledge’ in How Many Questions? Essays in honor of Sidney Morgenbesser Leigh S. Causman, Isaac Levi, Charles Parsons and Robert Schwartz (eds.), Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis, pp. 276–300.Google Scholar
  52. Rosenthal, David M., 2002, ‘The Timing of Conscious States’, Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 11, pp. 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rosenthal, David M., 2004, ‘Being Conscious of Ourselves’, Monist, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 159–181.Google Scholar
  54. Rosenthal, David M., 2005, ‘Two Concepts of Consciousness’, Consciousness and Mind, Clarendon, Oxford, pp. 21–45.Google Scholar
  55. Said, Edward W., 2001, ‘The Clash of Ignorance’, The Nation, October 22 http://www.thenation.com/doc/20011022/said > Accessed 23/06/2006.
  56. Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey, 1991, ‘Being a Realist About Relativism (in Ethics)’, Philosophical Studies, vol. 61, pp. 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schlick, Moritz, 1934, ‘The Foundation of Knowledge’, Erkenntnis, vol. 4. Reprinted in Logical Positivism, A.J. Ayer (ed.), Free Press, New York, 1959, pp. 205–227.Google Scholar
  58. Snowdon, Paul, 2003, ‘Knowing How and Knowing That: A Distinction Reconsidered’, Aristotelian Society Presidential Address, October 13, University of London, Senate House.Google Scholar
  59. Stapp, Henry P., 1993, Mind, Matter and Quantum Mechanics, Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  60. Stockwell, John, 1978, In Search of Enemies: A CIA Story, W.W. Norton, LondonGoogle Scholar
  61. Suppe, Frederick, 1979, The Structure of Scientific Theories, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 2nd edition.Google Scholar
  62. Watkins, J.W.N., 1957, ‘Historical Explanation in the Social Sciences’, British Journal of Philosophy of Science, vol. 8, pp. 104–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Williams, Bernard, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics, Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
  64. Wiredu, Kwasi, 1998, ‘The State, Civil Society and Democracy in Africa’, Quest, Special Issue: State and Civil Society in Africa, vol. 12, no. 1, June, pp. 240–252.Google Scholar
  65. Zimmerman, Ulf, 2001, Book review of Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress, Lawrence E. Harrison and Samuel P. Huntington (eds.), Basic Books, New York, 2000, www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.cgi?path = 26284981759538 Accessed September 2006.Google Scholar
  66. Zuelow, Eric, 2002, Book review of Ethnonationalism in the Contemporary World: Walker Connor and the Study of Nationalism, Daniele Conversi (ed.), Routledge, New York. http://www.nationalismproject.org/book > Accessed October 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helen Lauer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations