Since the passing of its founder – Charles Moore – in 1967, the Hawaiian ‘Philosophy East and West’ has approached comparative philosophy as synonymous for ‘non-Western philosophy’. This is not in agreement with what I consider comparative philosophy to be. To me, the focus remains on the word ‘comparative’: only by real comparison do we bring cultures closer. Those who limit themselves to a purely descriptive juxtaposition lay the load of comparing on the shoulders of the reader, who is often not best placed or equipped to successfully do this, through lack of experience and knowledge. Comparison is the task of philosophy.
What is this comparison? It is most certainly not the search for similarities, because these are often trivial. Dissimilarities are much more interesting to explore; they represent furthermore the characteristics of civilizations. Additionally, the sum of all these dissimilarities can be used as the basis for a world-encompassing meta-philosophy. But it is not my purpose to construct a World philosophy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Libbrecht, U. (2009). Comparative Philosophy: A Methodological Approach. In: Note, N., Fornet-Betancout, R., Estermann, J., Aerts, D. (eds) Worldviews and Cultures. Einstein Meets Magritte: An Interdisciplinary Reflection on Science, Nature, Art, Human Action and Society, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5754-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5754-0_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4502-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5754-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)