Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Accounting and Modelling Global Resource Use

  • Chapter
Handbook of Input-Output Economics in Industrial Ecology

Part of the book series: Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science ((ECOE,volume 23))

Monitoring the transition of modern societies towards a path of sustainable development requires comprehensive and consistent information on the relations between socio-economic activities and resulting environmental consequences. In the past 15 years, several approaches have been developed providing this information in biophysical terms (see, for example, Daniels and Moore 2002 for an overview). These methods of physical accounting are applied to quantify “ societal metabolism ” (Fischer-Kowalski 1998) and to measure the use of “ environmental space ” (Op-schoor 1995) by human activities. Within the system of physical accounts on the national level (for a classification see United Nations 2003), material flow accounting and analysis (MFA) and land use accounting are regarded as appropriate tools to provide a comprehensive picture of environmental pressures induced by and interlinked with the production and consumption of a country.

In the European Union (EU), a large number of policy documents address high levels of resource use and production of huge amounts of waste and emissions as one major obstacle for the realisation of an environmentally sustainable development in industrialised countries. The sustainable management of natural resources, in order to keep anthropogenic environmental pressures within the limits of Earth 's carrying capacity, is highlighted as one central objective for the implementation of a sustainability strategy within Europe (for example, European Commission 2001a). De-coupling (or de-linking) economic growth from the use of natural resources and environmental degradation is defined as the core strategy to achieve sustainable levels of resource use; raising the resource productivity of production and consumption activities should help producing the same or even more products with less resource input and less waste (European Commission 2003).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adriaanse, A., Bringezu, S., Hamond, A., Moriguchi, Y., Rodenburg, E., Rogich, D., et al. (1997). Resource flows: The material base of industrial economies. Washington, DC: World Resource Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, N., & Wyckoff, A. (2003). Carbon dioxide emissions embodied in international trade(No. DSTI/DOC(2003)15). Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almon, C. (1991). The INFORUM approach to interindustry modelling. Economic Systems Research, 3(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amann, C., Bruckner, W., Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Grünbühel, C. (2002). Material flow accounting in Amazonia. A tool for sustainable development. Working Paper No. 63. Vienna: IFF Social Ecology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, R. U. (1989). Industrial metabolism. Printed in J. Ausubel (Ed.), Technology and environment(pp. 23–49). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R., Allen, J. K., & Bras, B. (2004). Applying ecological input-output flow analysis to material flows in industrial systems. Part I: Tracing flows. Part II: Flow metrics. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 8(1–2), 45–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrensmeier, R., & Bringezu, S. (1995). Zur Methodik der volkswirtschaftlichen Material-Intensit ä ts-Analyse. Ein quantitativer Vergleich des Umweltverbrauchs der bundesdeutschen Produktionssektoren. Wuppertal Paper No. 34., Wuppertal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bicknell, K. B., Ball, R. J., Cullen, R., & Bigsby, H. R. (1998). New methodology for the ecological footprint with an application to the New Zealand economy. Ecological Economics, 27(2), 149–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Board on Earth Sciences and Resources (2004). Materials count: The case for material flows analysis. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringezu, S., & Schütz, H. (2001). Total material requirement of the European Union. No. Technical Report No. 55. Copenhagen: European Environmental Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringezu, S., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Klein, R., & Palm, V. (1997). Regional and national material flow accounting: From paradigm to practice of sustainability. Wuppertal Special 4. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment, Energy. Wuppertal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringezu, S., Behrensmeier, R., & Schütz, H. (1998). Material flow accounts indicating environmental pressure from economic sectors. Printed in K. Uno & P. Bartelmus (Eds.), Environmental accounting in theory and practice. Hingham, MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, C., & Herendeen, R. (1975). The energy costs of goods and services. Energy Policy, 1(4), 268–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., & Qiao, L. (2001). A preliminary material input analysis of China. Population and Environment, 23(1), 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, P. L., & Moore, S. (2002). Approaches for quantifying the metabolism of physical economies. Part I: Methodological overview. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5(4), 69–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchin, F. (2005). A world trade model based on comparative advantage with m regions, n goods and k factors. Economic Systems Research, 17(2), 141–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ecological Economics (2000). Special issue: Ecological footprint. Ecological Economics, 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder, P., & Narodoslawsky, M. (1999). What environmental pressures are a region 's industries responsible for? A method of analysis with descriptive indices and input-output models. Ecological Economics, 29(3), 359–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EEA (2002). Corine land cover update 2000. Technical Report No. 89. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA (2003). Europe 's environment. The third assessment. Environmental Assessment Report No. 10. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001a). On the sixth environmental action programme of the European Community — Environment 2010 — Our future, our choice. No. COM (2001) 31 Final. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001b). A sustainable Europe for a better world: A European union strategy for sustainable development. The Commission 's proposal to the Gothenburg European Council. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003). Towards a thematic strategy for the sustainable use of natural resources. No. COM(2003) 572 Final. Brussels: DG Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • EUROSTAT (2001). Economy-wide material flow accounts and derived indicators. A methodological guide. Luxembourg, Europe: Statistical Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • EUROSTAT (2002). Material use in the European Union 1980–2000: Indicators and analysis. Luxembourg, Europe: Statistical Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • EUROSTAT (2005). Development of material use in the EU-15: 1970–2001. Material composition, cross-country comparison, and material flow indicators. Luxembourg, Europe: Statistical Office of the European Community.

    Google Scholar 

  • Femia, A. (1996). Input-output anylsis of material flows: An application to the German economic system for the year 1990. Quaderni di recerca No. 82. Ancona, Italy: Universita di Ancona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferng, J.-J. (2001). Using composition of land multiplier to estimate ecological footprints associated with production activity. Ecological Economics, 37(2), 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G., Shah, M., & van Velthuizen, H. (2002). Climate change and agricultural vulnerability. Vienna: Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, H., Lichtblau, K., Meyer, B., & Scheelhaase, J. (2004). Wachstums- und Besch ä f-tigungsimpulse rentabler Materialeinsparungen [Growth and employment impulses of profitable material savings]. Wirtschaftsdienst, 84(4), 247–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Kowalski, M. (1998). Society 's metabolism. Printed in G. Redclift & G. Woodgate (Eds.), International handbook of environmental sociology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Amann, C. (2001). Beyond IPAT and Kuznets curves: Globalization as a vital factor in analysing the environmental impact of socio-economic metabolism. Population and Environment, 23(1), 7–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giljum, S. (2004). Trade, material flows and economic development in the South: The example of Chile. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 8(1–2), 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giljum, S., & Eisenmenger, N. (2004). North-South trade and the distribution of environmental goods and burdens: A biophysical perspective. Journal of Environment and Development, 13(1), 73–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giljum, S., Behrens, A., Hammer, M., Hinterberger, F., Kovanda, J., & Niza, S. (2004). The material basis of the global economy. Presentation of data and implications for sustainable resource use policies in North and South. Paper presented at the Presentation at the 2004 ConAccount Workshop, ETH Zurich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grether, J.-M., & de Melo, J. (2003). Globalization and dirty industries: Do pollution havens matter? (No. 9776). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Reserach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M., & Hubacek, K. (2002). Material flows and economic development. Material flow analysis of the Hungarian economy. Interim Report No. 02-057. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hans-B ö ckler-Stiftung (Ed.) (2000). Work and ecology. Final Project Report. Düsseldorf, Germany: Hans-B ö ckler-Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, T. W. (1997). Global trade analysis, modelling and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterberger, F., Moll, S., & Femia, A. (1998). Arbeitsproduktivit ä t, Ressourcenproduktivit ä t und Ressourcenintensit ä t der Arbeit. Graue Reihe des Instituts für Arbeit und Technik No. 1998–02. Wuppertal, Germany: Wuppertal Institut für Klima, Umwelt, Energie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterberger, F., Aldo, F., & Renn, S. (1999, 30 September — 2 October 1999). Economic growth with less material input? De-composing the empirical trend of de-linking. Paper presented at the Nature, Society and History. Long Term Dynamics of Social Metabolism, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterberger, F., Omann, I., & Stocker, A. (2002). Employment and environment in a sustainable Europe. Empirica, 29, 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubacek, K., & Giljum, S. (2003). Applying physical input-output analysis to estimate land appropriation (ecological footprints) of international trade activities. Ecological Economics,44(1), 137–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubacek, K., & Sun, L. (2001). A scenario analysis of China 's land use and land cover change: Incorporating biophysical information into input-output modelling. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 12(4), 367–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, S. (2000). Product environmental life-cycle assessment using input-output techniques. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 3(2 – 3), 95–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleijn, R., Bringezu, S., Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Palm, V. (1999). Ecologizing societal metabolism. Designing scenarios for ustainable materials management. No. CML Report 148, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, G.-M. (1998). Applying an integrated natural resource accounts and input-output model to development planning in Indonesia. Economic Systems Research, 10(1), 113–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief, W., Koo, J., Nasar, S., & Sohn, I. (1982). The production and consumption of non-fuel minerals to the year 2030 analyzed within an input-output framework of the U.S. and world economy. No. NSF/CPE-82002. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, E., Bringezu, S., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Huetller, W., Kleijn, R., Moriguchi, Y., et al. (2000). The weight of nations. Material outflows from industrial economies. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, G. W., & Patterson, M. G. (2004). Ecological footprints and interdependencies of New Zealand regions. Ecological Economics, 50(1), 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B., & Uno, K. (1999). COMPASS — Ein globales Energie-Wirtschaftsmodell. ifo Studien, 4, 703–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B., Bockermann, A., Ewerhardt, G., & Lutz, C. (1999). Marktkonforme Umweltpolitik. Printed in W. Müller and M. Bihn (Eds.), Umwelt und Ö konomie(Vol. 28). Heidelberg, Physica-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B., Lutz, C., & Wolter, I. (2003). Global multisector/mulitcountry 3 — E modelling from COMPASS to GINFORS. GWS DiscussionPaper2003/3. Osnabrück & Berlin: Institute for Economic Structures Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B., Lutz, C., & Wolter, M. I. (2004). Economic growth of the EU and Asia. A first forecast with the global econometric model GINFORS. Policy and Governance Working Paper Series No. 26. Tokyo: Keio-University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (1985). Input-output analysis: Foundations and extensions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, S., Bringezu, S., Femia, A., & Hinterberger, F. (2002). Ein Input-Output-Ansatz zur Analyse des stofflichen Ressourcenverbrauchs einer National ö konomie. Ein Beitrag zur Methodik der volkswirtschaftlichen Materialintensit ä tsanalyse. Printed in F. Hinterberger & H. Schnabl (Eds.), Arbeit-Umwelt-Wachstum. Nachhaltigkeitsaspekte des sektoralen Struktur-wandels. Norderstedt, Germany: Book on Demand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, S., Acosta, J., & Villanueva, A. (2004). Environmental implications of resource use — insights from input-output analyses. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mündl, A., Schütz, H., Stodulski, W., Sleszynski, J., & Welfens, M. (1999). Sustainable development by dematerialization in production and consumption — strategy for the new environmental policy in Poland. No. Report 3. Warsaw: Institute for Sustainable Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muradian, R., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2001). Trade and the environment: From a Southern perspective. Ecological Economics, 36(2), 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (2001). Pollution havens. An analysis of policy options for dealing with an elusive phenomenon. Journal of Environment and Development, 10(2), 147–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2004). Recommendation on material flows and resource productivity. Adopted by the OECD Council on 21 April 2004. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opschoor, J. B. (1995). Ecospace and the fall and rise of throughput intensity. Ecological Economics, 15, 137–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scasny, M., Kovanda, J., & Hak, T. (2003). Material flow accounts, balances and derived indicators the Czech Republic during the 1990s: Results and recommendations for methodological improvements. Ecological Economics, 45(1), 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schandl, H., & Eisenmenger, N. (2004). Global resource extraction. Paper presented at the Poster presented at the 8th International Conference of the International Society for Ecological Economics (ISEE), Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Bleek, F. (1994). Wie viel Umwelt braucht der Mensch? MIPS — das Maβ für ö kologisches Wirtschaften. Berlin/Basel, Switzerland: Birkhauser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Bleek, F., Bringezu, S., Hinterberger, F., Liedtke, C., Spangenberg, J., Stiller, H., et al. (1998). MAIA. Einführung in die Materialintensit ä tsanalyse nach dem MIPS-Konzept. Berlin/Basel, Germany: Birkhauser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, H., Bringezu, S., & Moll, S. (2004). Globalisation and the shifting environmental burden. Material trade flows of the European Union. Wuppertal, Germany: Wuppertal Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg, J., & Bonnoit, O. (1998). Sustainability indicators — a compass on the road towards sustainability. Wuppertal Paper No. 81, February 1998, Wuppertal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg, J., Omann, I., & Hinterberger, F. (2002). Sustainable growth criteria. Minimum benchmarks and scenarios for employment and the environment. Ecological Economics, 42(3), 429–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt (2002). Ergebnisse der umwelt ö konomischen Gesamtrechnungen zur Bo-dennutzung durch wirtschaftliche Aktivit ä ten. Wiesbaden, Germany: Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdell, C. (2001). Globalisation and sustainability: Environmental Kuznets curve and the WTO. Ecological Economics, 39(2), 185–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2003). Integrated environmental and economic accounting 2003. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uno, K. (2002a). Economy- energy- environment. Beyond the Kyoto protocol. Dordrecht, The Netherlands/Boston, MA/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uno, K. (2002b). Energy projections: Comparison of methodologies. Printed in K. Uno (Ed.), Economy-energy-environment simulation: Beyond the Kyoto protocol, Dordrecht, The Netherlands/Boston, MA/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Voet, E., van Oers, L., & Nikolic, I. (2003). Dematerialisation: Not just a matter of weight. CML Report No. 160. Leiden, The Netherlands: Centre of Environmental Science (CML), Leiden University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, P. A. (1972). Pollution: Economy and the environment. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth. Gabriola Island, British Columbia: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • WWF, UNEP, & Global Footprint Network (2004). Living planet report 2004. Gland, Switzerland: WWF.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sustainable Europe Research Institute (SERI), Vienna, Austria

    Stefan Giljum

  2. Sustainable Europe Research Institute, Wien (SERI), Austria

    Friedrich Hinterberger

  3. Institute for Economic Structures Research (GWS), Osnabr ü ck, Germany

    Christian Lutz

  4. University of Osnabr ü ck, and Director of the Institute for Economic Structures Research (GWS), Osnabr ü ck, Germany

    Bernd Meyer

Authors
  1. Stefan Giljum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Friedrich Hinterberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christian Lutz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bernd Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering, University of Minnesota, 1390 Eckles Avenue, Saint Paul, MN, 55108-6005, USA

    Sangwon Suh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giljum, S., Hinterberger, F., Lutz, C., Meyer, B. (2009). Accounting and Modelling Global Resource Use. In: Suh, S. (eds) Handbook of Input-Output Economics in Industrial Ecology. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5737-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation