Increasing empirical evidence suggests that current levels of anthropogenic environmental pressures on the world-wide level do not comply with requirements of environmental sustainability (for example, WWF et al. 2004). Especially industrialized countries, responsible for the largest share of pressures on the global environment, are demanded to significantly reduce the material and energy resources used for production and consumption and to achieve de-linking (or de-coupling) of economic growth from environmental degradation. The concept of de-linking was adopted by a large number of national, European and international environmental policies (for example, European Commission 2003; OECD 2004). While de-linking in relative terms decreases the resource intensity of economic processes, absolute de-linking is required from a sustainability point of view, in order to keep economic and social systems within the limits of the ecosphere (Hinterberger et al. 1997).1
Monitoring the transition of societies towards de-linking targets requires comprehensive and consistent information on the relations between socio-economic activities and resulting environmental consequences. In the past 15 years, a large number of approaches were developed providing this information in biophysical terms.2 These methods proved to be appropriate tools to quantify “ societal metabolism ” (Fischer-Kowalski 1998) and to measure the use of “ environmental space ” (Opschoor 1995) by human activities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bailey, R., Allen, J. K., & Bras, B. (2004). Applying ecological input-output flow analysis to material flows in industrial systems. Part I: Tracing flows. Part II: Flow metrics. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 8(1–2), 45–91.
Birch, R., Barrett, J., & Wiedmann, T. (2004). Exploring the consumption and related environmental impacts of socioeconomic groups within the UK. Paper presented at the Workshop “ Driving forces for and barriers to sustainable consumption ”, Leeds, UK.
Cleveland, C. J., & Ruth, M. (1999). Indicators of dematerialization and the materials intensity of use. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(3), 15–50.
Daniels, P. L., & Moore, S. (2002). Approaches for quantifying the metabolism of physical economies. Part I: Methodological overview. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5(4), 69–93.
Dinda, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: A survey. Ecological Economics, 49, 431–455.
European Commission (2003). Towards a thematic strategy for the sustainable use of natural resources (No. COM (2003) 572 final). Brussels: DG Environment.
EUROSTAT (2001). Economy-wide material flow accounts and derived indicators. A methodological guide. Luxembourg, Europe: Statistical Office of the European Union.
Fischer-Kowalski, M. (1998). Society's metabolism. Printed in G. Redclift & G. Woodgate (Eds.), International handbook of environmental sociology. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
Giljum, S., & Hubacek, K. (2001). International trade, material flows and land use: Developing a physical trade balance for the European Union (Interim Report No. 01–059). Laxenburg, Austria: IIASA.
Giljum, S., Hubacek, K., & Sun, L. (2004). Beyond the simple material balance: A reply to Sangwong Suh's note on physical input-output analysis. Ecological Economics, 48(1), 19–22.
Gravgaåd, P. O. (1999). Physical input-output tables for Denmark. Products and materials 1990. Air emissions 1990–92. Kopenhagen: Statistics Denmark.
Hannon, B. (1973). The structure of ecosystems. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 41, 535–546.
Hinterberger, F., Luks, F., & Schmidt-Bleek, F. (1997). Material flows vs. ‘natural capital ’ What makes an economy sustainable?. Ecological Economics, 23(1), 1–14.
Hoekstra, R. (2003). Structural change of the physical economy. Decomposition analysis of physical and hybrid-unit input-output tables. Amsterdam: Tinbergen Institute.
Hubacek, K., & Giljum, S. (2003). Applying physical input-output analysis to estimate land appropriation (ecological footprints) of international trade activities [unpublished manuscript]. Ecological Economics, 44(1), 137–151.
Hubacek, K., Giljum, S., & Meier, A. (2004). The environmental impacts of material flows: Linking approaches of life cycle assessment (LCA) with physical input-output tables (PIOTs). Presentation at the 8th Biennial Scientific Conference for the International Society for Ecological Economics. ISEE 2004 Montr é al. July 11–14.
Kneese, A. V., Ayres, R. U., & d&Arge, R. C. (1970). Economics and the environment: A material balance approach. Baltimore, MD/London: John Hopkins.
Konijn, P., de Boer, S., & van Dalen, J. (1997). Input-output analysis of material flows with applications to iron, steel and zinc. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 8(1), 129–153.
Konjin, P. J. A., de Boer, S., & van Dalen, J. (1995). Material flows, energy use and the structure of the economy (National Accounts Occasional Paper No. Nr. NA-077). Voorburg, The Netherlands: Statistics Netherlands.
Kratena, K., Chovanec, A., & Konechy, R. (1992). Eine ö kologische volkswirtschaftliche Gesamtrechnung f ü r Ö sterreich. Die Umwelt Input Output Tabelle 1983. Wien: Institut f ü r sozial-, wirtschafts- und umweltpolitische Forschung.
Kratterl, A., & Kratena, K. (1990). Reale Input-Output Tabelle und ö kologischer Kreislauf. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag.
M ä enp ä ä, I. (2002). Physical input-output tables of Finland 1995 — solutions to some basic methodological problems. Paper presented at the Fourteenth International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, Montreal. Moll, S., & Acosta, J. (2003). Physical input-output analyses: Some experiences from ongoing research. Paper presented at the ConAccount Workshop, Wuppertal.
Nebbia, G. (2000). Contabilita monetaria e conatibilita ambientale. Estratto da “ Economia pubblica ”, 6–2000.
Niren, T., & Yoshida, T. (2004). Regional analysis of industrial ecology: A case study of Shiga Prefecture, Japan. Paper presented at the 8th ISEE Conference, Montreal.
Odum, H. T. (1960). Ecological potential and analogue circuits for the ecosystem. American Scientist, 48, 1–8.
OECD (2004). Recommendation on material flows and resource productivity (Adopted by the OECD Council on 21 April 2004). Paris: OECD.
Opschoor, J. B. (1995). Ecospace and the fall and rise of throughput intensity. Ecological Economics, 15, 137–141.
Reijnders, L. (1998). The factor X debate: Setting targets for eco-efficiency. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(1), 13–22.
Sch ü tz, H., Bringezu, S., & Moll, S. (2004). Globalisation and the shifting environmental burden.Material trade flows of the European Union. Wuppertal, Germany: Wuppertal Institute.
Spangenberg, J., Femia, A., Hinterberger, F., & Sch ü tz, H. (1998). Material flow-based indicators in environmental teporting (Environmental Issues Series No. 14). Luxembourg, Europe: European Environmental Agency.
Stahmer, C., Kuhn, M., & Braun, N. (1996). Physical input-output tables. German experiences. Paper presented at the London Group Meeting on Environmental Accounting, Stockholm.
Stahmer, C., Kuhn, M., & Braun, N. (1997). Physische Input-Output-Tabellen 1990. Wiesbaden, Germany: Statistisches Bundesamt.
Statistisches Bundesamt (2001). A physical input-output table for Germany 1995. Wiesbaden, Germany: Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland.
United Nations (2003). Integrated environmental and economic accounting 2003. New York: United Nations.
van der Voet, E., van Oers, L., & Nikolic, I. (2003). Dematerialisation: Not just a matter of weight (CML Report No. 160). Leiden, The Netherlands: Centre of Environmental Science (CML), Leiden University.
Weisz, H. (2004). Accounting for raw material requirements: A comparison of input-output approaches. Paper presented at the ConAccount Workshop 2004, Zurich.
Weisz, H., & Duchin, F. (2005). Physical and monetary input-output analysis: What makes the difference?. Ecological Economics, 57(3), 534–541.
Weisz, H., Schandl, H., & Fischer-Kowalski, M. (1999). OMEN — an operating matrix for material interrelations between the Economy and Nature. How to make material balances consistent. Printed in R. Kleijn, M. Fischer-Kowalski & V. Palm (Eds.), Ecologizing societal metabolism: Designing scenarios for sustainable materials managment. CML, Leiden University: Leiden.
Wiedmann, T., Barrett, J., Billing, M., & Birch, R. (2004). The REAP tool — creating physical accounts for the UK and evaluating policy scenarios. Paper presented at the Workshop “ Driving forces for and barriers to sustainable consumption ”, Leeds, UK.
WWF, UNEP and Global Footprint Network (2004). Living planet report 2004. Gland, Switzerland: WWF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Giljum, S., Hubacek, K. (2009). Conceptual Foundations and Applications of Physical Input-Output Tables. In: Suh, S. (eds) Handbook of Input-Output Economics in Industrial Ecology. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5737-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5737-3_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4083-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5737-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)