Skip to main content

Time Use and Sustainability: An Input-Output Approach in Mixed Units

  • Chapter
Handbook of Input-Output Economics in Industrial Ecology

Part of the book series: Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science ((ECOE,volume 23))

Industrial Ecology as coined by Frosch and Gallopoulos (1989)1 has proven to be one operational and holistic concept for successfully implementing more sustain able policies. However, like many other concepts that have become popular in the post-Brundtland era during the late 1980s and early 1990s, such as Cleaner Pro duction (Baas et al. 1990), Ecological Modernisation (Jänicke 1988) and Industrial Metabolism (Ayres 1989), it has been open to criticism, due to the failure of en vironmental policies to achieve many of their ambitious goals set out during the Rio process. The shared pathology has usually been the technocratic approach and supply-side bias, as most clearly laid out in the sustainable consumptiondebate (UNEP 2002; Princen et al. 2002).2

Researchers have responded to this criticism by adjusting their policy approaches. Much more emphasise has recently been given to the study of household behaviour and demand side issues (e.g. Gatersleben 2000; Jackson 2004); socio-institutional and demographic concerns have been integrated with environmental-economic ones (e.g. Cogoy 1995; Madlener and Stagl 2001); and more and more effort has been devoted to understanding and disclosing the com plex relationship between consumption activities and well-being (Hofstetter and Madjar 2003; Jackson et al. 2004).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ayres, R. U. (1989). Industrial metabolism. In J. H. Ausubel & H. E. Sladovich (Eds.), Technology and environment(pp. 13–26). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baas, L., Hofman, H., Huisingh, D. V., Huisingh, J., Koppert, P., & Neumann, F. (1990). Protec tion of the North Sea: Time for clean production. Erasmus Centre for Environmental Studies, Ersamus University, Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, F. (1967). On the study of social change. American Anthropologist, 69(6), 661–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1965). A theory about the allocation of time. The Economic Journal, 75(299), 493–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman, W. (1995). Small is stupid. Blowing the whistle on the greens. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger, M. (2001). Technological progress and sustainable development. What about the rebound effect? Ecological Economics, 36, 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger, M. (2002). Time-saving innovations and their impact on energy use: Some lessons from a household-production-function approach, discussion paper 2002-W01, Soluthurn University of Applied Sciences and Northwestern Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairncross, A. K. (1958). Economic schizophrenia. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Feb, 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlstein, T., Parks, D., & Thrift, N. (Eds.) (1978a). Timing space and spacing time, volume 1: Making sense of time. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlstein, T., Parks, D., & Thrift, N. (Eds.). (1978b). Timing space and spacing time, volume 2: Human activity and time geography. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlstein, T., Parks, D., & Thrift, N. (Eds.). (1978c). Timing space and spacing time, volume 3: Time and regional dynamics. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cogoy, M. (1995). Market and non-market determinants of private consumption and their impacts on the environment. Ecological Economics, 13, 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cogoy, M. (1999). The consumer as a social actor. Ecological Economics, 28, 365–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cogoy, M. (2000). Ecological efficiency, economic efficiency and time efficiency in private consumption. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 8, 97–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, C., Lenzen, M., & Schaeffer, R. (2005). Energy requirements of households in Brazil. Energy Policy, 33(4), 555–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSerpa, A. C. (1971). A theory of the economics of time. The Economic Journal, 81(324), 828–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehling, M. (1999). The German time use survey. Methods and results. In J. Merz & M. Ehling (Eds.), Time use — research, data, and policy. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, R. (1988). Extended accounts for national income and product. Journal of Economic Liter ature, 26(4), 1611–1684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkman, S. (1997). Industrial ecology: An historical view. Journal of Cleaner Production, 5(1–2), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2000). Survey on time use. Activity coding list, Final Draft, DOC E2/TUS/5/00. Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. W. (1997). The frame of reference as a public good. The Economic Journal, 107(445), 1832–1847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frosch, R. A. & Gallopoulos, N. (1989). Strategies for manufacturing. Scientific American, 261(3), 94–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatersleben, B. (2000). Sustainable household consumption and quality of life: The acceptability of sustainable consumption patterns and consumer policy strategies. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 15(2), 200–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, D. R. (1984). Time allocation: A tool for the study of cultural behavior. Annual Review of Anthropology, 13, 519–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawrylyshyn, O. (1977). Towards a definition of non-market activities. Review of Income and Wealth, 23(1), 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P. T. (1979). Do-it-yourself and GDP. Review of Income and Wealth, 31(1), 31–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, F. (1977). Social limits of growth. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstetter, P. & Madjar, M. (2003). Linking changes in happiness, time use, sustainable consumption, and environmental impacts: An attempt to understand time-rebound effects, Final Project Report, Büro für Analyse & Ö kologie, Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. (2004). Models of mammon — a cross-disciplinary survey in the pursuit of the “sustainable consumer”, ESRC Sustainable Technologies Working Paper 2004/1, Swindon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T., Jager, W., & Stagl, S. (2004). Beyond insatiability: Needs theory, consumption and sustainability, ESRC Sustainable Technologies Working Paper, 2004/2, Swindon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jänicke, M. (1988). Ö kologische Modernisierung. Optionen und Restriktionen präventiver Umweltpolitik. In U. Simonis (Ed.), Präventive Umweltpolitik(pp. 13–26). Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalas, M. (2002). A time use perspective of the material intensity of consumption. Ecological Economics, 41, 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juster, F. T. & Stafford, F. P. (1991). The allocation of time: Empirical findings, behavioral models, and problems of measurement. Journal of Economic Literature, 29(2), 471–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juster, F. T., Courant, P. N., & Dow, G. K. (1981). A theoretical framework for the measurement of well-being. Review of Income and Wealth, 27(1), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemier, B., Keuning, S., & Van De Ven, P. (1999). Measuring Well-Being with an Integrated System of Economic and Social Accountants. An Application of the SESAME Approach to the Netherlands, Discussion Paper P-30/1999–2, Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick, J. W. (Ed.). (1996). The new system of national accounts.London: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keuning, S. J. (1994). The SAM and beyond: Open SESAME! Economic Systems Research, 6(1), 21–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keuning, S. J. (2000). Accounting for welfare with SESAME. In United Nations, handbook of national accounting. Household accounting, experience in concepts and compilation, Vol. 2, Studies in Methods F, No. 75 (pp. 273–307). New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. H. (2002). Changes in consumption patterns and environmental degradation in Korea. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 13, 1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klevermarken, A. (1999). Microeconomic analysis of time use data. Did we reach the promised land? In J. Merz & M. Ehling (Eds.), Time use — research, data policy(pp. 423–456). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief, W. (1970). Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: An input-output approach. Review of Economics and Statistics, 52(3), 262–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madlener, R. and Stagl, S. (2001). Sozio-Ö kologisch-Ö konomische Beurteilung Handelbarer Zer-tifikate und Garantierter Einspeisetarife für Ö kostrom (Socio-Ecological-Economic Evaluation of Tradable Certificates and Guaranteed Feed-in Tariffs for Green Electricity). Zeitschrift fü r Energiewirtschaft, 1, 53–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. E. & Blair, P. D. (1985). Input-output analysis. Foundations and extensions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, R. A. and Wachter, M. L. (1975). The relevance of the household production function and its implication for the allocation of time. The Journal of Political Economy, 83(2), 255–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Princen, T., Maniates, M., & Conca, K. (Eds.). (2002). Confronting consumption. London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyatt, G. (1990). Accounting for time use. Review of Income and Wealth, 36(1), 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, M. G. (1934). Economics of household production. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. P. & Godbey, G. (1997). Time for life. The surprising ways Americans use their time. University Park, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstein-Rodan, P. N. (1934). The role of time in economic theory. Economica, 1(1), 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, A. (2003). Zeitprismen nach Hägerstrand und Ihre Verknüpfung mit Sozio-Ö konomischen Input-Output Tabellen. Paper presented at the 5th Weimarer Kolloquium of the Association for Ecological Economics Germany, Weimar, 10–12 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, L., Bartlett, S., Hawk, D., & Vine, E. (1989). Linking life-styles and energy use: A matter of time? Annual Review of Energy, 14, 273–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, E. (1974). Small is beautiful. London: Abracus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, C. (1981). The economics of time. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stäglin, R. & Schintke, J. (2002). Analytische Auswertung von Physischen, Monetären und Zeit-Input-Output Tabellen, Nutzungsmöglichkeiten für Wirtschafts-, Umwelt- und Beschäftigungspolitik, Endbericht zum Auftrag von EUROSTAT, Grant Agreement 200041200003, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahmer, C. (1995). Satellitensystem für Aktivitäten der Privaten Haushalte. In B. Seel & C. Stahmer (Eds.), Haushaltsproduktion und Umweltbelastung: Ansätze einer Ökobilanzie-rung für den Privaten Haushalt(pp. 60–111). New York: Frankfurt a.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahmer, C. (2000). The magic triangle of input-output. Paper presented at the XIII International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, 21–25 August, Macerata, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahmer, C., Ewerhart, G., & Herrchen, I. (2003a). Monetä re, Physische und Zeit-Input-Output-Tabellen, Teil 1: Konzepte und Beispiele, Schriftenreihe Sozio-ökonomisches Berichtssystem f ür eine Nachhaltige Gesellschaft, Band 1. Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahmer, C., Ewerhart, G., & Herrchen, I. (2003b). Monetäre, Physische und Zeit-Input-Output-Tabellen, Teil 1: Konzepte und Beispiele, Materialband zu Band 1 der Schriftenreihe Sozio-ökonomisches Berichtssystem für eine Nachhaltige Gesellschaft. Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahmer, C., Mecke, I., & Herrchen, I. (2003c). Zeit für Kinder. Betreuung und Ausbildung von Kindern und Jugendlichen, Teil 3 der Schriftenreihe Sozio-ökonomisches Berichtssystem fü r eine Nachhaltige Gesellschaft. Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahmer, C., Herrchen, I., & Schaffer, A. (2004). Sozio-Oekonomische Input-Output Rechnung 1998, Schriftenreihe Sozio-ö konomisches Berichtssystem für eine Nachhaltige Gesellschaft, Band 4. Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt (2003), Wo Bleibt die Zeit?, Bundesministerium fuer Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh, S., Huppes, G., & de Haes, H. U. (2002). Environmental impacts of domestic and imported commodities in U.S. economy. Paper presented at the 14th International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, October 10–15, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szalai, A. (Ed.). (1972). The use of time. Daily activities of urban and suburban populations in twelve countries. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1975). Towards a system of social and demographic statistics, Studies in methods. Series F, No. 18, New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1993a). Systems of national accounts. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1993b). Integrated environmental and economic accounting, Studies in methods. Series F, No. 61, New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2002). Sustainable consumption: A global status report, division of technology, industry and economics. Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Statistics Division (UNST). (2004). Draft international classification of activities for time use. New York: United Nations Publication Board, www.unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/timeuse/tuaclass.htm.

  • Van der Werf, P. (2002). Tijdbesteding en Energiegebruik(IVEM-doctoraalsverslag Nr. 149). Groningen (in Dutch).

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, P. A. (1972). Pollution: Economy and environment. Oxford: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vringer, K. and Blok, K. (1995). The direct and indirect energy requirements of households in The Netherlands. Energy Policy, 23(10), 893–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, C. and Perrels, A. (2000). Modelling lifestyle effects on energy demand and related emissions. Energy Policy, 28, 549–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedmann, T., Minx, J.C., Barrett, J. and Wachernagel, M. (2006) Allocating Ecological Footprints to Final Consumption Categories with Input-Output Analysis, Ecological Economics 56:28–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wier, M., Lenzen, M., Munksgaard, J. and Smed, S. (2001) Environmental Effects of Household Consumption Pattern and Lifestyle, Economic Systems Research 13: 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Minx, J.C., Baiocchi, G. (2009). Time Use and Sustainability: An Input-Output Approach in Mixed Units. In: Suh, S. (eds) Handbook of Input-Output Economics in Industrial Ecology. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5737-3_37

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics