Skip to main content

Input-Output Equations Embedded Within Climate and Energy Policy Analysis Models

  • Chapter
Book cover Handbook of Input-Output Economics in Industrial Ecology

Part of the book series: Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science ((ECOE,volume 23))

  • 3442 Accesses

In this paper we show how IO equations for sector outputs and prices are used as part of a larger policy analysis modeling system for energy and climate-related studies. The IO framework is particularly useful because it can accommodate the analysis of both price and direct program expenditure impacts. We briefly discuss the advantages of including non-price programs in any serious climate policy or sustainable energy strategy. Further, we contend that the impacts on the economy from a set of price and program expenditure polices can be seen by comparing constructed IO tables for a future year, such as 2030, with and without these polices. We present the All Modular Industry Growth Assessment (AMIGA) modeling system which has the capability to forecast future IO table values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acemoglu, D. (2002). Directed technical change. Review of Economic Studies, 69(4), 781–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armington, P. S. (1969). A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 16, 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, C., Fullerton, D., Shoven, J., & Whalley, J. (1985). A general equilibrium model for tax policy evaluation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W., & Oates, W. (1988). Theory of environmental policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BEA. (2005). Make and use annual input and output tables. Washington, DC: Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce.

    Google Scholar 

  • EIA. (2005). Annual energy outlook 2006 with projections to 2030. Washington, DC: Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA. (2003). Annual report. Protecting the environment together. Energy star and other voluntary programs. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, D., Duleep, K., & McManus, W. (2004). Future potential of hybrid and diesel powertrains in the US light-duty vehicle market. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, D., & Laitner, J. A. S. (2004). An integrated analysis of policies that increase investments in advanced energy-efficient/low-carbon technologies. Energy Economics, 26(4), 739–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, D. A., & Laitner, J. A. (2006). Technology policy and world greenhouse gas emissions in the amiga modeling system. Cleveland, OH: Energy Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemfert, C. (1998). Estimated substitution elasticities of a nested ces production function approach for Germany. Energy Economics, 20(3), 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laitner, John A. “Skip”, and Donald A. Hanson. 2006. “Modeling Detailed Energy-Efficiency Technologies and Technology Policies within a CGE Framework.” Energy Journal Special Edition, Hybrid Modeling of Energy-Environment Policies: Reconciling Bottom-Up and Top-Down: 151–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, K. (1971). Consumer demand: A new approach. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marano, J. (2005). Use of the mars petroleum refining model for energy and climate assessments. Paper presented at the INFORMS Operations Research Conference, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press, W., & Vetterling, W. (1992). Numerical recipes in c: The art of scientific computing. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M., Thimmapuram, P., Fisher, R., & Maciorowski, W. (1993). Long-term industrial energy forecasting (lief) model (18-sector version). Argonne, IL: Argonne National Lab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmeyer, D. (1998). Trading capital for energy. Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H., & Yohe, G. (1992). Microeconomic analysis (3rd ed.). New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hanson, D.A., Laitner, J.A.“. (2009). Input-Output Equations Embedded Within Climate and Energy Policy Analysis Models. In: Suh, S. (eds) Handbook of Input-Output Economics in Industrial Ecology. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5737-3_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics