Skip to main content

Recoverable Resources: Simulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mineral Resource Estimation

Abstract

Local uncertainty estimates do not account for the variability from one location to another. The idea of simulation is to assess the joint uncertainty between multiple realizations allowing a more complete representation of block uncertainty and the uncertainty between multiple block locations. The tools described in this Chapter allow transferring uncertainty of the resource estimates into risk in downstream studies. These studies are mine design, mine planning, or operational optimization studies; the risk assessment is achieved after applying transfer functions to the conditional simulation models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aarts E, Korst J (1989) Simulated annealing and boltzmann machines. Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Abzalov M (2006) Localised uniform conditioning: a new approach for direct modeling of small blocks. Math Geol 38(4):393–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilar CA, Rossi ME (1996) (January) Método para Maximizar Ganancias en San Cristóbal. Minería Chilena, Santiago, Chile, Ed. Antártica, No. 175, pp 63–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Alabert FG (1987a) Stochastic imaging of spatial distributions using hard and soft information. MSc Thesis, Stanford University, p 197

    Google Scholar 

  • Alabert FG (1987b) The practice of fast conditional simulations through the LU decomposition of the covariance matrix. Math Geol 19(5):369–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida AS, Journel AG (1994) Joint simulation of multiple variables with a Markov-type coregionalization model. Math Geol 26(5):565–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babak O, Deutsch CV (2009) Collocated cokriging based on merged secondary attributes. Math Geosci 41(8):921–926 [7]

    Google Scholar 

  • Badenhorst C, Rossi M (2012) Measuring the impact of the change of support and information effect at olympic dam. In: Proceedings of the IX international geostatistics congress, Oslo, June 11–15, 2012, pp 345–357, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucher A, Dimitrakopoulos R, Vargas-Guzman JA (2005) Joint simulations, optimal drillhole spacing and the role of stockpile. In: Leuangthong O, Deutsch C (eds) Geostatistics Banff 2004. Springer, Netherlands, pp 35–44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Caers J (2000) Adding local accuracy to direct sequential simulation. Math Geol 32(7):815–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caers J (2011) Modeling uncertainty in the earth sciences. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, p 229

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch CV (2002) Geostatistical reservoir modeling. Oxford University Press, New York, p 376

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrakopoulos R (1997) Conditional simulations: tools for modelling uncertainty in open pit optimisation. Optimizing with Whittle. Whittle Programming Pty Ltd, Perth, pp 31–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrakopoulos R, Ramazan S (2008) Stochastic integer programming for optimising long term production schedules of open pit mines: methods, application and value of stochastic solutions. Min Tech: IMM Transactions Section A 117:155–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowd PA (1994) Risk assessment in reserve estimation and open-pit planning. Trans Instn Min Metall Sect A-Min Industry 103:A148–A154

    Google Scholar 

  • Froidevaux R (1992) Probability field simulation. In: Soares A (ed) Geostatistics Toria ’92, pp 73–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Geman S, Geman D (1984) (November) Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell PAMI-6(6):721–741

    Google Scholar 

  • Glacken IM (1996) Change of support by direct conditional block simulation. Unpublished MSc Thesis, Stanford University

    Google Scholar 

  • Godoy M (2002) (August) The effective management of geological risk in long-term production scheduling of open pit mines. Unpublished PhD Thesis, W.H. Bryan mining geology research centre, The University of Queensland

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Hernández JJ (1992) Regularization of hydraulic conductivities: a numerical approach. In: Soares A (ed) Geostatistics Troia ’92, pp 767–778

    Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York, p 483

    Google Scholar 

  • Guardiano FB, Parker HM, Isaaks EH (1995) Prediction of recoverable reserves using conditional simulation: a case study for the Fort Knox Gold Project, Alaska. Unpublished Technical Report, Mineral Resource Development, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardtke W, Allen L, Douglas I (2011) Localised indicator kriging. 35th APCOM symposium, Wollongong pp 141–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaaks EH (1990). The application of Monte Carlo methods to the analysis of spatially correlated data. PhD Thesis, Stanford University, p 213

    Google Scholar 

  • Journel AG (1974) Geostatistics for conditional simulation of ore bodies. Econ Geol 69(5):673–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Journel AG, Huijbregts ChJ (1978) Mining geostatistics. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Journel AG, Kyriakidis P (2004) Evaluation of mineral reserves, a simulation approach. Oxford University Press, p. 216

    Google Scholar 

  • Journel AG, Xu W (1994) Posterior identification of histograms conditional to local data. Math Geol 26(6):323–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuangthong O, Deutsch CV (2003) Stepwise conditional transformation for simulation of multiple variables. Math Geol 35(2):155–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuangthong O, Hodson T, Rolley P, Deutsch CV (2006) Multivariate geostatistical simulation at Red Dog Mine, Alaska, USA, Canadian Institution of Mining, Metallurgy, and Petroleum, v. 99, No. 1094

    Google Scholar 

  • Luster GR (1985) Raw materials for Portland cement: applications of conditional simulation of coregionalization. PhD Thesis. Stanford University, Stanford, p 531

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcotte D (1993) Direct conditional simulation of block grades. In: Dimitrakopoulos R (ed) Geostatistics for the next century. Montreal, Canada, June 2–5, 1993 Kluwer, pp 245–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheron G (1973) The intrinsic random functions and their applications. Adv Appl Prob 5:439–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E (1953) Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines J. Chem. Phys., 21(6):1087–1092

    Google Scholar 

  • Oz B, Deutsch C, Tran T, Xie Y (2003) DSSIM-HR: A FORTRAN 90 program for direct sequential simulation with histogram reproduction. Comput Geosci 29:39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Olea RA (2004) Geostatistical analysis of compositional data. Oxford University Press, New York p 304

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren W (2005) Short note on conditioning turning bands realizations. Centre for Computational Geostatistics, Report Five, University of Alberta, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren W, Cunha L, Deutsch CV (2004) Preservation of multiple point structure when conditioning by Kriging, CCG Report Six, University of Alberta, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt M (1952) Remarks on a multivariate transformation. Ann Math Statist 23(3):470–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi ME (1999) Optimizing grade control: a detailed case study. In: Proceedings of the 101st annual meeting of the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy, and Petroleum (CIM), Calgary (May 2–5)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi ME, Camacho VJ (2001) Applications of geostatistical conditional simulations to assess resource classification schemes. Proceedings of the 102nd annual meeting of the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy, and Petroleum (CIM), Quebec City (April 29–May 2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Soares A (2001) Direct sequential simulation and cosimulation. Math Geol 33:911–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strebelle S (2002) Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiplepoint statistics. Math Geol 34:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Brunt BH, Rossi ME (1999) Mine planning under uncertainty constraints. Proc of the optimizing with Whittle 1999 conference, (22–25 March), Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Verly G (1984) Estimation of spatial point and block distributions: the multigaussian model. PhD Dissertation, Department of Applied Earth Sciences, Stanford University

    Google Scholar 

  • Verly G (1993) Sequential Gaussian Cosimulation: a simulation method integrating several types of information. In: Soares A (ed) Geostatistics Troia ’92, vol 1. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 543–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel H (2003) Multivariate geostatistics: an introduction with applications. Springer, New York, p 387

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario E. Rossi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rossi, M., Deutsch, C. (2014). Recoverable Resources: Simulation. In: Mineral Resource Estimation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5717-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics