Effect of detachment on the palatability of two kelp species

  • Eva Rothäusler
  • Martin Thiel
Conference paper
Part of the Developments in Applied Phycology book series (DAPH, volume 1)

Abstract

Many species of macroalgae survive after becoming dislodged from their primary substratum, but little is known about their capacity to express anti-herbivore defences after detachment. We examined the effect of detachment on the relative palatability of the two kelp species Lessonia nigrescens and Macrocystis integrifolia to mesograzers. Laboratory and field experiments were conducted on the northern-central coast of Chile to investigate whether (i) time after detachment and (ii) grazing on detached and attached algae could trigger internal defence mechanisms in the algae, which may have acted as deterrents to grazing. In order to examine palatability, feeding assays were run after each experiment using fresh algal pieces and artificial food. Time after detachment had a significant influence on palatability of L. nigrescens but not of M. integrifolia. During the first 12 days of detachment, detached L. nigrescens held in grazer-free laboratory tanks were not significantly more palatable than attached conspecifics from the field but thereafter detached individuals became more palatable. Floating individuals of M. integrifolia showed no effect of detachment, indicating that this alga maintains its defence after detachment. An experiment conducted in the field confirmed these results for M. integrifolia. An additional laboratory experiment confirmed that attachment status plays an important role on algal defence reaction for L. nigrescens when exposed to grazers. Detached and previously grazed individuals of this species were less palatable than grazer-free control algae, but grazing had no effect on palatability of attached algae. Our results indicate that kelps have varying capacities for development of anti-grazing responses once they become detached, possibly depending on their capacity to float and survive after detachment.

Key words

defence dislodgement detachment floating macroalgae palatability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bazzaz FA, Chiariello NR, Coley PD, Pitelka LF (1987) Allocating resources to reproduction and defense. BioScience 37: 58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benz CB, Eiseman NJ, Gallaher EE (1979) Seasonal occurrence and variation in standing crop of a drift algal community in the Indian River, Florida. Bot. Mar. 22: 413–420.Google Scholar
  3. Brooks RA, Bell SS (2001) Mobile corridors in marine landscapes: Enhancement of faunal exchange at seagrass/sand ecotones. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 264: 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cetrulo GL, Hay ME (2000) Activated chemical defenses in tropical versus temperate seaweeds. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 207: 243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cronin G, Hay ME (1996a) Induction of seaweed chemical defenses by amphipod grazing. Ecology 77: 2287–2301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cronin G, Hay ME (1996b) Susceptibility to herbivores depends on recent history of both the plant and animal. Ecology 77: 1531–1543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deysher L, Norton TA (1982) Dispersal and colonization in Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 56: 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duffy JE, Hay ME (2001) The ecology and evolution of marine consumer-prey interactions. In Bertness MD, Hay ME, Gaines SD (eds), Marine Community Ecology: Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA, pp. 131–159.Google Scholar
  9. Geertz-Hansen O, Sand-Jensen K, Hansen DF, Christiansen A (1993) Growth and grazing control of abundance of the marine macroalga, Ulva lactuca L in a eutrophic Danish estuary. Aquatic Bot. 46: 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hammerstrom K, Dethier MN, Duggins DO (1998) Rapid phlorotannin induction and relaxation in five Washington kelps. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 165: 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hay ME, Paul VJ, Lewis SM, Gustafson K, Tucker J, Trindell R (1988) Can tropical seaweeds reduce herbivory by growing at night? Diel patterns of growth, nitrogen content, herbivory, and chemical versus morphological defenses. Oecologia 75: 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hay ME (1991) Fish-seaweed interactions on coral reefs: Effects of herbivorous fishes and adaptations of their prey. In Sale PF (ed.), The ecology of fishes on coral reefs, Academic Press, California, pp. 371–413.Google Scholar
  13. Hay ME (1996) Marine chemical ecology: What’s known and what’s next?. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 200:103–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Helmuth BS, Veit RR, Holberton R (1994) Long-distance dispersal of a subantarctic brooding bivalve (Gaimardia trapesina) by kelp rafting. Mar. Biol. 120: 421–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Herms DA, Mattson WJ (1992) The dilemma of plants to grow or defend. Q. Rev. Biol. 67: 283–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hirata T, Tanaka J, Iwami T, Ohmi T, Dazai A, Aoki M, Ueda H, Tsuchiya Y, Sato T, Yokohama Y (2001) Ecological studies on the community of drifting seaweeds in the south-eastern coastal waters of Izu Peninsula, central Japan. I. Seasonal changes of plants in species composition, appearance, number of species and size. Phycol. Res. 49: 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hobday AJ (2000) Age of drifting Macrocystis pyrifera (L.) C. Agardh rafts in the Southern California Bight. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 253: 97–114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoffmann A, Santelices B (1997) Flora marina de Chile central, Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 434 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Inglis G (1989) The colonisation and degradation of stranded Macrocystis pyrifera by the macrofauna of a New Zealand sandy beach. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 125: 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ingólfsson A (1995) Floating clumps of seaweed around Iceland: natural microcosms and means of dispersal for shore fauna. Mar. Biol. 122: 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ingólfsson A (1998) Dynamics of macrofaunal communities of floating seaweed clumps off western Iceland: A study of patches on the surface of the sea. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 231: 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ingólfsson A (2000) Colonization of floating seaweed by pelagic and subtidal benthic animals in southwestern Iceland. Hydrobiologia 440: 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Littler MM, Littler DS (1980) The evolution of thallus form and survival strategies in benthic marine macroalgae: Field and laboratory tests of a functional form model. Am. Nat. 116: 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Littler MM, Littler DS, Taylor PR (1983) Evolutionary strategies in a tropical barrier reef system: Functional-form groups of marine macroalgae. J. Phycol. 19: 229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lobban CS, Harrison PJ (1994) Seaweed ecology and physiology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 366 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Lubchenco J, Gaines SD (1981) A unified approach to marine plant-herbivore interactions. I. Populations and communities. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12: 405–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Macaya E, Boltaña S, Hinojosa I, Macchiavello J, Valdivia N, Vásquez N, Buschmann A, Vásquez J, Vega J, Thiel M (2005) Presence of sporophylls in floating kelp rafts of Macrocystis spp. (Phaeophyceae) along the Chilean Pacific Coast. J. Phycol. 41: 913–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Norton TA, Mathieson AC (1983) The biology of unattached seaweeds. In Round FE, Chapman DJ (eds.), Progress in Phycological Research: Elsevier SP, Amsterdam, pp. 333–376.Google Scholar
  29. North WJ (1994) Reviewof Macrocystis biology. In Akatsuka I (ed.), Biology of Economic Algae. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, Netherlands, pp. 447–527.Google Scholar
  30. Norkko A, Bonsdorff E (1996) Population responses of coastal zoobenthos to stress induced by drifting algal mats. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 140: 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ólafsson E, Ingólfsson A, Steinarsdóttir MB (2001) Harpacticoid copepod communities of floating seaweed: Controlling factors and implications for dispersal. Hydrobiologia 453/454: 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parr AE (1939) Quantitative observations on the pelagic Sargassum vegetation of the western North Atlantic. Bull. Bingham Oceanogr. Collection 6: 1–94.Google Scholar
  33. Paul VJ, Fenical W (1986) Chemical defense in tropical green algae, order Caulerpales. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 34: 157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Paul VJ, Van Alstyne KL (1992) Activation of chemical defenses in the tropical green algae Halimeda spp. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 160: 191–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pavia H, Cervin G, Lindgren A, Åberg P (1997) Effects of UV-B radiation and simulated herbivory on phlorotannins in the brown alga Ascophyllum nodosum. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 157: 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pavia H, Toth GB (2000) Inducible chemical resistance to herbivory in the brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum. Ecology 81: 3212–3225.Google Scholar
  37. Peckol P, Krane JM, Yates JL (1996) Interactive effects of inducible defense and resource availability on phlorotannins in the North Atlantic brown alga Fucus vesiculosus. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 138: 209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Renaud PE, Hay ME, Schmitt TM (1990) Interactions of plant stress and herbivory: Intraspecific variation in the susceptibility of a palatable versus an unpalatable seaweed to sea urchin grazing. Oecologia 82: 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rodríguez SR (2003). Consumption of drift kelp by intertidal populations of the sea urchin Tetrapygus niger on the central Chilean coast: Possible consequences at different ecological levels. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 251: 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sotka EE, Taylor RB, Hay ME (2002) Tissue-specific induction of resistance to herbivores in a brown seaweed: The importance of direct grazing versus waterborne signals from grazed neighbors. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 277: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Steinberg PD (1984) Algal chemical defense against herbivores: Allocation of phenolic compounds in the kelp Alaria marginata. Science 223: 405–406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Taylor RB, Sotka E, Hay ME (2002) Tissue-specific induction of herbivore resistance: Seaweed response to amphipod grazing. Oecologia 132: 68–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thiel M (2002) The biogeography of littoral algal-associated peracarids along the Chilean coast. J. Biogeogr. 29: 999–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thiel M, Vásquez JA (2000) Are kelp holdfasts islands on the ocean floor? Indication for temporarily closed aggregations of peracarid crustaceans. Hydrobiologia 440: 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thiel M, Gutow L (2004) The ecology of rafting in the marine environment. I. The floating substrata. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 42: 181–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Toth GB, Pavia H (2001) Lack of phlorotannin induction in the kelp Laminaria hyperborea in response to grazing by two gastropod herbivores. Mar. Biol. 140: 403–409.Google Scholar
  47. Van Alstyne KL (1988) Herbivore grazing increases polyphenolic defenses in the intertidal brown alga Fucus distichus. Ecology 69: 655–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van Alstyne KL (1989) Adventitious branching as a herbivore-induced defense in the intertidal brown alga Fucus distichus. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 56: 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Van Alstyne KL, Wolfe GV, Freidenburg TL, Neill A, Hicken C (2001) Activated defense systems in marine macroalgae: Evidence for an ecological role for DMSP cleavage. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 213: 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Watson D, Norton TA (1985) The physical characteristics of seaweed thalli as deterrents to littorine grazers. Bot. Mar. 28: 383–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zubia M, Payri CE, Deslandes E, Guezennec J (2003) Chemical composition of attached and drift specimens of Sargassum mangarevense and Turbinaria ornata (Phaeophyta: Fucales) from Tahiti, French Polynesia. Bot. Mar. 46: 562–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva Rothäusler
    • 1
    • 2
  • Martin Thiel
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Institut für Aquatische ÖkologieRostockGermany
  2. 2.Facultad Ciencias del MarUniversidad Católica del NorteLarrondo, CoquimboChile
  3. 3.Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Zonas Áridas (CEAZA)CoquimboChile

Personalised recommendations