Skip to main content

Is a Transcultural Law for Human Genetics and Biotechnology Possible?

  • Chapter
The Influence of Genetics on Contemporary Thinking

Part of the book series: Logic, Epistemology, and The Unity of Science ((LEUS,volume 6))

Abstract

In this contribution the author suggests the necessity to find a new focus to the law related to genetics and biotechnology. Phenomena like globalization are not equal to the process of universalitation of values and goods to be protected by law. For a juridical approach to these matters it seems necessary to explore first the scientific and cultural contexts involved. Transculturality is an acceptable way to try to find common values that could be relevant to elaborate a universal legal framework for genetics and biotechnology. Then there is framework for harmonization, but giving anyway priority to universal recognized human rights. Human rights also present an objective dimension that permits through them the protection of realities or situations independent of the possibility of accepting the existence of a subject titleholder of a specific right. The challenge nowadays is to be able to recognize to human rights also a collective perspective. For Criminal Law specifically there is needed to avoid the recourse to a merely symbolic Law, in reference to which the legislator is more worried about expressing a moral and social rejection towards certain activities and to calm society than for an effective legal persecution of the same (as some are still in the future)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Canguilhem G (1966) Le normal et le pathologique. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cortina A (2004) Una ética transnacional de la corresponsabilidad. In: Serrano V (ed) Ética y Globalización. Biblioteca Nueva, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Delmas-Marty M (1997) Le Droit est-il universalisable? In: Changeux (dir) Une même éthique pour tous? Comité Consultatif National d’Éthique, Ëditions Odile Jacob, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eser A, Koch H-G (2003) Forschung mit humanen embryonalen Stammzellen. Strafrechtliche Grundlagen und Grenzen Rechtsgutachten von Hans Dahls/Bernd Müssig und Albin Eser/Hans-Georg Koch, Standpunkte Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Wiley-VCH.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fagot-Largeault A (1985) L’homme bio-éthique. Pour une déontologie de la recherche sur le vivant. Maloine, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grupo de expertos sobre Bioética y Clonación (1999) Report on Cloning, FCS, ed. Siete Calles, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harris J (2004) On cloning. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jonas H (1984) Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation. Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaufmann Art (1999) Rechtsphilosophie, 2. Aufl., C. H. Beck, München.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Romeo-Casabona C (2004) Laying the foundations for a transcultural Biotechnology Law (Editorial). Law Hum Genome Rev 20.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Romeo-Casabona C (2002) Embryonic stem cell research and therapy: the need for a common European legal framework. Bioethics (Special issue) 16(6).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Romeo-Casabona C (2002) Los genes y sus leyes. El Derecho ante el genoma humano, Cátedra Interuniversitaria Fundación BBVA – Diputación Foral de Bizkaia de Derecho y Genoma Humano & Editorial Comares, Bilbao-Granada.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Romeo Casabona C (1997) Legal limits on research and its results? The cloning paradigm. Law Hum Genome Rev 6.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Saada-Gendron C (1999) La tolerance. Flammarion, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Singer P (2004) One world. The ethics of globalization, 2nd edn. Yale University Press, New Haven & London.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sulston J (2004) Society and human genome. Law and the Human Genome Review 20.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vallespín J (2004) El problema de la fundamentación de una ética global. In: Serrano V (ed) Ética y Globalización, Biblioteca Nueva, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  19. UNESCO (2005) International bioethics committee. Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  20. UNESCO (2003) International declaration on human genetic data.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Romeo-Casabona, C.M. (2007). Is a Transcultural Law for Human Genetics and Biotechnology Possible?. In: Fagot-Largeault, A., Rahman, S., Torres, J.M. (eds) The Influence of Genetics on Contemporary Thinking. Logic, Epistemology, and The Unity of Science, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5664-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics