Abstract
Recent muon spin rotation (μ+SR) spectroscopy of YBa2Cu3O7 finds that the superconductivity (i) is consistent with nodeless pairing (e.g., s-wave or extended s-wave), after fluxon-pinning is taken into account, and (ii) is well-described by a two-fluid model. These are the same results as found over a decade ago in samples with strongly pinned vortices. As compared with the two-fluid fit, the probability of the same quality fit to the recent data, assuming a d-wave model, was found to be nearly 4x10-6. Clearly YBa2Cu3O7 is a nodeless, strong-coupling superconductor.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
K. McElroy, R. W. Simmonds, J. E. Hoffman, D.-H. Lee, J. Orenstein, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, and J. C. Davis, Nature 422, 592 (2003).
A. Damascelli, Z.-X. Shen, and Z. Hussain, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 473 (2003).
J. C. Campuzano, M. R. Norman, and M. Randeria, in Physics of Superconductors, Vol. II, “Physics of Conventional and Unconventional Superconductors,” ed. by K. H. Benneman and J. B. Ketterson (Springer, Berlin, 2004), pp. 167–273.
D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rpts. 250, 1 (1995).
S. M. Rao, J. K. Srivastava, H. Y. Tang, D. C. Ling, C. C. Chung, J. L. Yang, S. R. Sheen, and M. K. Wu, J. Crystal Growth 235, 271 (2002).
M. K. Wu, D. Y. Chen, D. C. Ling, and F. Z. Chien, Physica B 284–288, 477 (2000).
J. D. Jorgensen, B. W. Veal, A. P. Paulikas, L. J. Nowicki, G. W. Crabtree, H. Claus, and W. K. Kwok, Phys. Rev. B 41, 1863 (1990).
K. A. Muller, Phil. Mag. Lett. 82, 279 (2002).
J. D. Dow and M. Lehmann, Phil. Mag. 83, 527 (2003).
D. R. Harshman, W. J. Kossler, X. Wan, A. T. Fiory, A. J. Greer, D. R. Noakes, C. E. Stronach, E. Koster, and J. D. Dow, Phys. Rev. B 69, 174505 (2004) and Phys. Rev. B 72, 146502 (2005). This latter paper demonstrates why the d-wave pairing of the Canadian group [J. E. Sonier, D. A. Bonn, J. H. Brewer, W. N. Hardy, R. F. Kiefl, and R. Liang, Phys. Rev. B 72, 146501 (2005)] lacks credibility.
H. S. Amin, M. Franz, and I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5864 (2000); 82, 3232 (1999).
K. A. Moler, D. L. Sisson, J. S. Urbach, M. R. Beasley, A. Kapitulnik, D. J. Baar, R. Liang, and W. N. Hardy, Phys. Rev. B 55, 3954 (1997). 273
L. Taillefer, B. Lussier, R. Gagnon, K. Behnia, and H. Aubin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 483 (1997).
D. R. Harshman and J. D. Dow, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 19, 147–151 (2005).
The neutron data show that Sr2Y(Ru1-uCuu)O6 has less than 1% impurity of any kind.
D. R. Harshman, W. J. Kossler, A. J. Greer, D. R. Noakes, C. E. Stronach, E. Koster, M. K. Wu, F. Z. Chien, J. P. Franck, I. Isaac, and J. D. Dow, Phys. Rev. B 67, 054509 (2003).
J. D. Dow and D. R. Harshman, Physica C 388–389, 447 (2003).
J. D. Dow, “High-temperature superconductivity without cuprate planes.” J. Supercond., in press (2005). (Special issue: Stripes04 – Nanoscale Heterogeneity and Quantum Phenomena in Complex Matter).
J. D. Dow, H. A. Blackstead, Z. F. Ren, and D. Z. Wang, Pis’ma v. Zh. Exp. Teor. Fiz. 80, 216 (2004). Engl. transl.: JETP Lett. 80, 190 (2004).
L. Soderholm, C. Williams, S. Skanthakumar, M. R. Antonio, and S. Conradson, Z. Physik B 101, 539 (1996).
M. Lehmann, J. D. Dow, and H. A. Blackstead, Physica C 341–348, 309 (2000).
Numerous experiments have been published which claim that the oxygen isotope effect is intrinsic, supposedly proving that the cuprate-planes superconduct. [H. Keller, “Unconventional Isotope Effects in Cuprate Superconductors”, Struct. Bond, pp. 114–169, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2005; R. Khasanov, A. Shengalaya, E. Morenzoni, M. Angst, K. Conder, I. M. Savic, H. Keller, J. Phys. Condensed Matter 15, L17 (2003); R. Khasanov, A. Shengalaya, E. Morenzoni, M. Angst, K. Conder, I. M. Savic, D. Lampalis, E. Liarokapis, A. Tatsi, H. Keller, Phys. Rev. B 68, 220506 (2003).] A paper contradicting this work is D. R. Harshman, J. D. Dow, and A. T. Fiory, “Vanishing Isotope Effect in ‘deal’ High-TC Superconductors” [to be published]. This paper shows that the Khasanov-Keller work is executed on non-optimized samples and ignores the degradation in the quality of the superconducting hole condensate. In particular, Keller et al. treat Y1-xPrxBa2Cu3O7 samples, which superconduct at 90 K when pure. [Z. Zou, J.Ye, K. Oka, and Y. Nishihara, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1074–1077 (1998); A. Shukla,. Barbiellini, A. Erb, A. Manuel, T. Buslaps, V. Honkimäki, and P. Suortti, Phys. Rev. 59, 12127 (1999); F. M. Morbru, L. Ghivelder, Y. G. Zhao, W. A. Ortiz, and V. T. Venkatesan, Physica C 341–348, 413 (2000)]. But these materials have significant numbers of Pr-on-Ba-site defects when they are impure (Keller’s case), and so with increasing defect concentration, the defects degrade the superconductivity and eventually destroy it. [For a review of materials with Pr-on-Ba-site defects, see H. B. Radousky, J. Mater. Res. 7, 1917–1955 (1992).]
J. D. Dow, H. A. Blackstead, and D. R. Harshman, Physica C 364–365, 74 (2001) show that the BaO, SrO, or other similar layers are the loci of superconductivity.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dow, J., Harshman, D.R., Fiory, A.T. (2007). II.2 Cuprate and other unconventional superconductors. In: Scharnberg, K., Kruchinin, S. (eds) Electron Correlation in New Materials and Nanosystems. NATO Science Series, vol 241. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5659-8_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5659-8_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5657-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5659-8
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)