Skip to main content

Spatial Optimisation in Land-Use Allocation Problems

  • Chapter
Modelling Land-Use Change

Part of the book series: The GeoJournal Library ((GEJL,volume 90))

Abstract

In densely populated areas, space for development is confined, making spatial planning essential to reconcile the interests of all stakeholders. In the process of policymaking, possible future land-use scenarios are often very valuable as a reference point, but the optimal configuration in terms of costs and effects might provide even more valuable inputs when decisions have to be taken. Tools for exploring optimal land-use configurations are therefore of great interest to policymakers. With these tools, plans can be evaluated and adjusted. Spatial optimisation is a powerful method to explore the potentials of a given area to improve the spatial coherence of land-use functions. In the Netherlands, there are many different planning issues in which multi-objective spatial optimisation can play an important role. This chapter describes two case studies that apply the genetic algorithm approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aerts, J. (2002) Spatial Decision Support for Resource Allocation, PhD Thesis, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasly, J.E. (2002) Population heuristics, in Pardalos, P.M. and Resende, M.G.C. (eds) Handbook of Applied Optimization , Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 138–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglund, H. and Jonsson, B.G. (2003) Nested plant and fungal communities; the importance of area and habitat quality in maximizing species capture in boreal old-growth forests, Biological Conservation, 112: 319–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dauer, J.P. and Liu, Y.H. (1990) Multiple Objective linear programs in objective space. European Journal of Operational Research, 46: 350–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ECLNV (2004) Landelijke Natuurdoelenkaart [National Nature Purpose Map], ECLNV, Ede.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P.R. (1995) The scale of the human enterprise and biodiversity loss, in Lawton, J.H. and May, R.M. (eds) Extinction Rates, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 214–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU (1992) Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992, Council of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig, L. (2001) How much habitat is enough? Biological Conservation, 100: 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, J.N., Schlesinger, W.H., Levy II, H., Michaels, A. and Schnoor, J.L. (1995) Nitrogen fixation: anthropogenic enhancement – environmental response, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 9(2): 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J.P. (2001) Demography versus habitat fragmentation as determinants of genetic variation in wild populations, Biological Conservation, 100: 15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, A. (2002) Multi-method assessment of map similarity, in Ruiz, M., Gould, M. and Ramon, J. (eds) Proceedings of the 5th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science, Palma, Spain, pp. 171–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, A. (2003) Fuzzy set approach to assessing similarity of categorical maps, International Journal for Geographical Information Science, 17(3): 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuberger, P.S.C. and Aben, J.M.M. (2002) Technische Achtergronden bij het rapport “effecten van verplaatsing van agrarische ammoniakemissies: verkenning op provinciaal niveau”, (in Dutch), Report 725501005, RIVM, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuberger, P.S.C., Bakema, A.H. and van Adrichem, M.J.A. (1997) Optimalisatie milieurendement; methodiek en berekeningen voor optimale emissiereducties, (in Dutch), Report 408143003, RIVM, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J.H. (1975) Adaptations in Natural and Artificial Systems, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. W. Loonen, P. Heuberger and M. Kuijpers-Linde

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J.R. and Koch, G.G. (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics, 33: 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loonen, W., Heuberger, P.S.C., Bakema, A.H. and Schot, P.P. (2006) Application of a Genetic Algorithm to minimize agricultural nitrogen deposition in nature reserves, Agricultural Systems, 88(3): 360–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LNV (1990) Natuurbeleidsplan. Regeringsbeslissing. Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij, Den Haag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luenberger, D. (1984) Introduction to Linear and Nonlinear Programming, Addison Wesley, Harlow.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, M.D., Possingham, H.P., Ball, I.R. and Cousins, E.A. (2002) Mathematical methods for spatially cohesive reserve design, Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 7(2): 107–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, W. and Harremoes, P. (1999) Genetic algorithms in real time control applied to minimize transient pollution from urban wastewater systems, Water Research, 33(5): 1265–1277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, B. and Skeffington, R.A. (1999) Critical loads, Progress in Environmental Science, 1: 371–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIVM (2002) Milieubalans 2002, het Nederlandse Mmilieu Verklaard, (In Dutch), Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, D. and Modak, M.M. (2003) Optimization of fed-batch bioreactors using genetic algorithms, Chemical Engineering Science, 58: 2283–2296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seppelt, R. and Voinov, A. (2002) Optimization methodology for land use patterns using spatially explicit landscape models, Ecological Modelling, 151: 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, S., Caeiro, S. and Painho, M. (2002) Assessment of map similarity of categorical maps using Kappa statistics, ISEGI, Lisbon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C.D, Cameron, A., Green, R.E., Bakkenes, M., Beaumont, L.J., Collingham, Y.C., Erasmus, B.F., De Siqueira, M.F., Grainger, A., Hannah, L, Hughes, L., Huntley, B., van Jaarsveld, A.S., Midgley, G.F., Miles, L., Ortega-Huerta, M.A., Peterson, A., Phillips, O.L. and Williams, S.E. (2004) Extinction risk from climate change, Nature, 427(6970): 145–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dam, J., Heuberger, P.S.C., Aben, J. and van Pul, W.A.J. (2001) Effecten van verplaatsing van agrarische ammoniakemissies: verkenning op provinciaal niveau, (in Dutch), Report 722501003, RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, S., Thierens, D. and de Berg, M. (2002) Using genetic algorithms for solving hard problems in GIS, GeoInformatica, 6(4): 381–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Jaarsveld, J.A. and de Leeuw, F.A.A.M. (1993) OPS: an operational atmospheric transport model for priority substances, Environmental software, 8: 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Jaarsveld, J.A. (1995) Modelling the long-term atmospherical behaviour of pollutants on various spatial scales, PhD Thesis, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands, also available as Report 722501005, RIVM, Bilthoven.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Jaarsveld, J.A. (2004) The Operational Priority Substances Model: Description and validation of OPS-Pro 4.1, Report 500045001/2004, RIVM, Bilthoven.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Jaarsveld, J.A., Bleeker, A. and Hoogervorst, N.J.P. (2000) Evaluation of ammonia emission reduction on the basis of measurements and model calculations, Report 722108025, RIVM, Bilthoven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, H.J.W. and Opdam, P.F.M. (1995) Effectiveness of roadside verges as dispersal corridors for small ground-dwelling animals: a simulation study, Landscape and Urban Planning, 31(1–3): 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vink, K. and Schot, P.P. (2002) Multiple-objective optimization of drinking water production strategies using a genetic algorithm, Water Resources Research, 38(9):1181, doi:10.1029/2000WR000034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek, P.M., Mooney, H.A., Lubchenco, J. and Melillo, J.M. (1997) Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems, Science, 277(5325): 494–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zander, P. and Kächele, H. (1999) Modelling multiple objectives of and use for sustainable development, Agricultural Systems, 59(1999): 311–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Loonen, W., Heuberger, P., Kuijpers-Linde, M. (2007). Spatial Optimisation in Land-Use Allocation Problems. In: Koomen, E., Stillwell, J., Bakema, A., Scholten, H.J. (eds) Modelling Land-Use Change. The GeoJournal Library, vol 90. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5648-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics