Landscape Changes in the Israeli Carmel Area

An application of matrix land-use analysis
  • M. Sonis
  • M. Shoshany
  • N. Goldshlager
Part of the The GeoJournal Library book series (GEJL, volume 90)

Abstract

The spatial redistribution of land uses can be measured by conventional remote sensing methods in the form of matrices of land-use redistributions within a given set of regions in a given time period. Two new methods of analysis of such land-use redistribution matrices are proposed: the ‘superposition principle’ and the ‘minimum information’ approach. For an empirical validation of these new methods, a settlement in the vicinity of the Haifa Carmel area is chosen. For different time intervals, the main trends in land-use redistribution are identified together with their minimum information artificial landscapes.

Keywords

Matrix land-use analysis superposition principle minimum information approach land-use change Israeli Carmel area 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amiran, D.H.K. (1996) Preservation and future land use in agriculture, the mosaic of Israeli geography, The Negev Press, Ben Gurion, pp. 107–112.Google Scholar
  2. Barbero, G., Bonin, G., Loiesel, R. and Quezel, P. (1990) Changes and distribution of western part of ecosystem caused by human activities in the Mediterranean basin, Vegetation,87: 151–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben Artzi, J. (1986) The Settlement of the Carmel and its Coastal Plain in the Modern Period, in The Carmel - Man and Settlements, Society for the Preservation of Nature, Jerusalem (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  4. Ben Artzi, J. (1996) From Germany to Eretz Israel - The Settlement of the Templars in Eretz Israel, Yad Ben Zvi, Jerusalem (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  5. Broide, H., Kaplan, M. and Perevolotsky, A. (1996) The development of woody vegetation in the Ramat Hanadiv Park and the impact of fire: a historical survey based on aerial photos, Ecology and Environment, 2(1–2): 127–131 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  6. Feitleson, E. (1995) Open space protection in Israel at turning point, Horizons in Geography, 42–43: 7–27 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  7. Frandez Ales, R., Martin, A., Ortega, F. and Ales, E.E. (1992) Recent change in land use structure and function in a Mediterranean region of SW Spain (1959–1984), Landscape Ecology, 7(1): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gavish, D. and Sonis M. (1979) Urban Expansion of Tel-Aviv into the Rural Area, Karka (land), Jerusalem, pp. 15–26 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  9. Grossman, D., Shoshany, M. and Kutiel, P. (1993) Landscape Changes in the Carmel Ridge in the Modern Era – Process and Methodology, A Geographic Perspective on the Social and Economic Restructuring of Rural Areas, International Geographical Congress, Kansas State University.Google Scholar
  10. Kutiel, P. (1994) Fire and ecosystem heterogeneity: a Mediterranean case study, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 129: 187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Naveh, Z. and Kutiel, P. (1990) Changes in the Mediterranean vegetation in response to human habitation and land use, in Woodwell, G.M. (ed) The Earth in Transition Patterns of Biotic Impoverishment, Cambridge, pp. 259–299.Google Scholar
  12. Naveh, Z. and Lieberman, A.S. (1984) Landscape Ecology Theory and Application, Springer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Perevolotsky, A., Lachman, E. and Follak, G. (1992) The human impact on Mediterranean vegetation, in The Mediterranean Scrubland, A Literature Review, Ramat Hanadiv Project, Research Reports Series, no 8, pp. 89–130.Google Scholar
  14. Shannon, C.E. and Weaver, W. (1964). The Mathematical Theory of Communications, University of Illinois Press. Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
  15. Sonis, M. (1968) Significance of entropy measures of homogeneity for the analysis of population redistributions, Geographical Problems. Mathematics in Human Geography, 77: 44–63, (in Russian).Google Scholar
  16. Sonis, M. (1980) Locational push-pull analysis of migration streams, Geographical Analysis, 12(1): 80–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sonis, M., Hewings, G.J.D. and Guo, J.M. (2000) A new image of classical key sector analysis: minimum information decomposition of the Leontief inverse, Economic Systems Analysis, 12(3): 401–423.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Sonis
    • 1
  • M. Shoshany
    • 2
  • N. Goldshlager
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of GeographyBar-Ilan UniversityRamat-GanIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Transportation and Geoinformation EngineeringIsrael Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael
  3. 3.Soil Erosion StationIsraeli Ministry of AgricultureEmek-HeferIsrael

Personalised recommendations