Skip to main content

Land-Use Change at Cadastral Parcel Level in Albania

An object-oriented geo-database approach to analyse spatial developments in a period of transition (1991-2003)

  • Chapter
Modelling Land-Use Change

Part of the book series: The GeoJournal Library ((GEJL,volume 90))

  • 4299 Accesses

Abstract

A case study in Albania is presented based on the EU Phare Land Use Policy II project results where GIS-oriented instruments and innovative methodologies were implemented to support decision making for land-use policy and planning. The developed Land-Use Information System for Albania allows the logical and functional hierarchical arrangement of land uses and data harmonisation with other land-use description systems. It is linked to the object-oriented Land-Use Change Analyses methodology that groups changes into conversions and modifications. The preferred change patterns indicate that land users take rational decisions when changing land use, even in the absence of any regulating plan, as is the case in post-communist Albania.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agrotec S.p.A. Consortium (2003a) LUP geo-database model - version 1.0, LUP II Technical report No. 1. EU Phare Project 98-0502 Land Use Policy II (author: G. Carrai).

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrotec S.p.A. Consortium (2003b) A standard methodology for land-use description and harmonisation between data sets, Technical report No. 2. EU Phare Project 98-0502 Land Use Policy II (author: L.J.M. Jansen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.R., Hardy, E.E., Roach J.T. and Witmer, R.E. (1976) A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964. USGS, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • APA (1999) Land-based Classification Standard, Second Draft, American Planning Association, Research Department, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonchi, F. and Pecori, S. (2003) Data Mining ed estrazione della conoscenza da grandi database territoriali, in Santini, L.G. and Zotta, D. (eds) Atti della Terza Conferenza Nazionale su Informatica e Pianificazione Territoriale - Input 2003, 5–7 June 2003, Pisa. Alinea, Firenze (on CDROM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Booch, G. (1994) Object-oriented Analysis and Design with Applications, Second edition, Benjamin/ Cummings Publishing Company, Redwood City, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (1993) Nomenclature des activités de la communauté européenne (NACE). Première révision. Règlement 761/93 du Conseil, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (1995) CORINE – Guide Technique, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (1999) CORINE Land Cover, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cihlar, J. and Jansen, L.J.M. (2001) From land cover to land use: a methodology for efficient land-use mapping over large areas, The Professional Geographer, 53(2): 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, P.F. (1995) Land reform, land registration and the cadastre – a comparative analysis between Bulgaria, Hungary and Rumania (downloadable from OICRF website).

    Google Scholar 

  • ECE-UN (1989) Proposed ECE Standard International Classification of Land Use, Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1998) FAO Statistical Databases (FAOSTAT), FAO, Rome (www.fao.org).

    Google Scholar 

  • Graefen, C. (2002) Land reform and land fragmentation and consequences for rural development in the CEE/CIS countries, Paper prepared for the International Symposium by FAO, GTZ, FIG, ARGE Landentwicklung und Technische Universität München, 25–28 February 2002, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, J. and Kamber, M. (2000) Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • IGU (1976) World land use survey. Report of the Commission to the General Assembly of the International Geographic Union, Geographica Helvetica, 1: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • INSPIRE Environmental Thematic Coordination Group, (2002) Environmental thematic user needs – position paper, version 2, European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, L.J.M., Carrai, G., Morandini, L., Cerutti, P.O. and Spisni, A. (2005) Analysis of the spatio-temporal and semantic aspects of land-cover/use change dynamics 1991–2001 in Albania at national and district levels, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 119: 107–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, L.J.M. and Di Gregorio, A. (1998) Land-use and land cover characterisation and classification: the need for baseline data sets to assess future planning, in Proceedings of the IGBP-DIS and IGBP/IHDP-LUCC Data Gathering and Compilation Workshop, 18–20 November 1998, Institute for Geography of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, L.J.M. and Di Gregorio, A. (2002) Parametric land cover and land-use classifications as tools for environmental change detection, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 91(1–3): 89-100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, L.J.M. and Di Gregorio, A. (2003) Land-use data collection using the “Land Cover Classification System” (LCCS): results from a case study in Kenya, Land Use Policy, 20(2): 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, L.J.M. and Di Gregorio, A. (2004) Obtaining land-use information from a remotely sensed land cover map: results from a case study in Lebanon, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation & Geoinformation, 5: 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin, E.F., Rounsevell, M.D.A. and Geist, H.J. (2000) Are agricultural land-use models able to predict changes in land-use intensity? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 82: 321–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin, E.F., Geist, H.J. and Lepers, E. (2003) Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions, Annual Reviews of Environmental Resources, 28: 205–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, S., Pecori, S. and Santucci, A. (2002) The competition for land between urban and rural systems investigated by G.I.S. and data-mining techniques, Decision Making in Urban and Civil Engineering, Vol. 1 and 3, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, W.B. and Turner, B.L. (eds) (1994) Changes in Land Use and Land Cover: A Global Perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozelle, S. and Swinnen, J.F.M. (2005) Success and failure of reform: insights from the transition of agriculture,Journal of Economic Literature (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinnen, J.F.M. (1999) The political economy of land reform choices in Central and Eastern Europe, Economics of Transition, 7(3): 637–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swinnen, J.F.M. (2000) Political and economic aspects of land reform and privatization in Central and Eastern Europe, Paper prepared for the UDMS Conference on Land markets and Land Consolidation in Central Europe, UDMS, Delft.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (1989) International Standard Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC), Third revision, United Nations Statistics Division, Statistical Classifications Section, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (1998) Central Product Classification (CPC). Version 1.0, United Nations Statistics Division, Statistical Classifications Section, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP/FAO (1994) Report of the UNEP/FAO expert meeting on harmonizing land cover and land use classifications, 23–25 November 1993, Geneva. GEMS Report Series No. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. (2003) Scenarios of Central European land fragmentation, Land Use Policy, 20(2): 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veldkamp, A., Kok, K., De Koning, G.H.J., Verburg, P.H. and Bergsma, A.R. (2001) The need for multi-scale approaches in spatial specific land-use change modeling, Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 6: 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg, P.H., De Groot, W.T. and Veldkamp, A. (2003) Methodology for multi-scale land-use change modelling -concepts and challenges, in Dolman, A.J., Verhagen, A., and Rovers, C.A. (eds) Global Environmental Change and Land-use, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. pp. 17–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., Steffen, W., Canadell, J. and Ingram, J. (eds) (1997) The Terrestrial Biosphere and Global Change: Implications for Natural and Managed Ecosystems, Synthesis volume, IGBP Book Series 4, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B. (1998) GCTE and LUCC – a natural and timely partnership, LUCC Newsletter, 3: 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jansen, L., Carrai, G., Petri, M. (2007). Land-Use Change at Cadastral Parcel Level in Albania. In: Koomen, E., Stillwell, J., Bakema, A., Scholten, H.J. (eds) Modelling Land-Use Change. The GeoJournal Library, vol 90. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5648-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics