Skip to main content

Historiographic essays

  • Chapter
Science and its History

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 253))

  • 1240 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adam, A. M., 1992. “Einstein, Michelson, and Crucial Experiment Revisited”. Methodology and Science, 25, 117-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph, 1957. “Duhem versus Galileo”. Brit. J. Phil. Sci., 8, 237-248. Reprinted in Agassi, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph, 1963, 1967. Towards an Historiography of Science, reproduced here.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph, 1966. Review of T. S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, J. Hist. Philos., 4, 351-4. Reprinted in Agassi, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph, 1967. “The Kirchhoff-Planck Radiation Law”, Science, 56, 61-7. Reprinted in Agassi, 1993, Radiation Theory and the Quantum Revolution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph, 1971. Faraday as a Natural Philosopher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph, 1977. Towards a Rational Philosophical Anthropology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph, 1980. “Between Science and Technology”. Philosophy of Science, 47, 82-99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph, 1981. “To Save Verisimilitude”. Mind, 90, 576-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph, 1983. “The Structure of the Quantum Revolution”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 13, 367-81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph, 1987. “Twenty Years After”. Reproduced above as "A Retrospect”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph, 1988. The Gentle Art of Philosophical Polemics: Selected Reviews and Comments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph, 1988a. “The Future of Big Science”, J. Applied Philos., 5, 17-26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph, 1990. “Newtonianism Before and After the Einsteinian Revolution”, reproduced below.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph, 1990a. “Peer Review: a Personal report.” Methodology and Science, 23, 171-80

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph, 1995. “Naming and Necessity: A Second Look”, Iyyun, The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly, 44, 243-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, Sir Francis, 1620, 1960. The New Organon and Related Writings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendix, Reinhard, 1970. Embattled Reason: Essays on Social Knowledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, Robert, 1661. Certain Physiological Essays. Reprinted in his Works.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchdahl, Gerd, 1965. “A revolution in historiography of science”, History of science, IV, 55-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budworth, David, 1981. Public Science, Private View.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, Mario, 1968. Scientific Research, II, The Search for Truth; Studies in the Foundations, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, Mario, 2001. Philosophy in crisis: The Need for Reconstruction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Dolores, L., 1988. A New Academic Marketplace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf, 1963. “Replies”. In Paul A. Schilpp, The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf, 1966. Philosophical Foundations of Physics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirrer Ernst, 1910, 1953. Substance and Function.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, I. Bernard, 1954. “Some Recent Books in the History of Science”, J. Hist. Ideas, 15, 1954, 163-92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, I. Bernard, 1956. Franklin and Newton. An Inquiry into Speculative Newtonian Experimental Science and Franklins Work on Electricity as an Example Thereof.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, I. Bernard, 1974. “Newton’s Theory vs. Kepler’s Theory and Galileo’s Theory.” In Y. Elkana, The Interaction Between Science and Philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, I. Bernard, 1987. Revolutions in Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen R. S. and others, 1976. Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen R. S. and L. Laudan, (editors) 1983. Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis: Essays in Honor of Adolf Grünbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conant, James Bryant, 1952, 1953. Modern Science and Modern man.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conant, James Bryant, 1963. The Education of American Teachers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conant, James Bryant, 1964. Shaping Educational Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, Diane, 1972. Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in Scientific Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crombie, A. C., ed., 1963. Scientific Change: Historical Studies in the Intellectual, Social and technical conditions for Scientific Discovery and Technical Invention, from Antiquity to the Present: Symposium on the history of science Oxford 9-15 July 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danhof, Clarence, 1968. Government Contracting and Technological Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, Pierre. 1914, 1954. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Trans. Philip P. Wiener.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, Pierre, 1996. Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science. Translated and Edited, with Introduction, by Roger Ariev and Peter Barker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, Albert, 1949, 1959. “Autobiographical Notes" and "Replies to Criticism”. In P. A. Schilpp, ed., 1949, 1959. Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, Albert, 1954. Foreword to Max Jammer, Concepts of Space. The History of Theories of Space in Physics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faraday, Michael, 1839. Experimental Researches in Electricity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, Martin J., 1984. The American academic Profession: A Synthesis of Social Scientific Inquiry Since World War II.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Steve, 1989. Philosophy of Science and its Discontent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, J. F., 1932. “Robert Boyle and His Influence on Thought in the Seventeenth Century”. Isis, 18, 77-102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelder, Lawrence Van, 1996. “Thomas Kuhn”, The New York Times, June 19, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginev, Dimitri and Robert S. Cohen, 1997. Issues and Images in the Philosophy of Science. Scientific and Philosophical Essays in Honour of Azarya Polikarov.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerlac, Henry, 1954. Review of D. McKie, Lavoisier. Isis, 45, 58-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerlac, Henry, 1961. Lavoisier: the Crucial Years: The Background and Origin of His First Experiments on Combustion in 1772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, Ian, 1993. “Working in a New World: The Taxonomic Solution” in P. Horwich, editor, World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, Ian, 1999. The Social Construction of What?

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn L. E. and P. A. Schilpp, eds., 1988. The Philosophy of W. V. Quine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, Norwood Russell, 1964. “On The Structure of Physical Knowledge”. In Stanley Elam, editor, Education and the Structure of Knowledge, 148-187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Sandra G., 1976. Can Theories be Refuted? Essays on the Duhem-Quine Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, Carl G., 1966. Philosophy of Natural Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, Carl G., 1979. “Scientific Rationality: Analytic vs. Pragmatic Perspectives”. In T. F. Graetz, ed. Rationality Today.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, Carl G., 1983. “Valuation and Objectivity in Science”. In Cohen and Laudan, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershberg, James G., 1993. James B. Conant: Harvard to Hiroshima and the Making of the Nuclear Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, Mary B., 1963. Review of T. S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Isis, 54, 286-287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko, 1975. Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, David, 1999. “The Use and Abuse of Sir Karl Popper.” Biology and Philosophy, 14, 481-504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaki, Stanley L., 1984. Uneasy Genius: The Life and Work of Pierre Duhem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Elihu and Paul Lazarsfeld, 1955. Personal Influence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarski, Lew, 1977. “New Forms of Organization in Physical Research after 1945" in C. Wiener, editor, History of Twentieth Century Physics, 370-401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyré, Alexandre, 1939. Études Galiléenne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyré, Alexandre, 1965, 1968. Newtonian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kragh, Helge, 1987. An Introduction to The Historiography of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S., 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S., 1963. “The Function of Dogma in scientific Research” and “Discussion”. In Crombie, 1963, 347-69, 386-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S., 1966. Review of Joseph Agassi,Towards an Historiography of Science, Brit. J. Phil. Sci., 17, 256-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S., 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Second Edition, Enlarged.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S., 1977. The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S., 1978. Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity 1894-1912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S., 1984. “Revisiting Planck”. Hist. Stud. in the Physical Sciences, 14, 231-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L., 1983. “The Demise of the Demarcation Problem”. In Cohen and Laudan, 1983, 111-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymor Martin, and David Riesman, 1975. Education and Politics in Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKie, Douglas, 1952, 1962. Antoine Lavoisier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manuel, Frank E., 1968. A Portrait of Isaac Newton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murzi Mauro, 2001. “Rudolf Carnap”. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, Ilkka. 1999. Critical Scientific realism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, Isaac, 1687, 1972. Philosophia Naturalis Principia Mathematica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton-Smith, William H, 1981. The rationality of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, Jean, 1965, 1971. Insights and Illusions of Philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Michael, 1958. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical philosophy..

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Michael, 1962. “The Republic of Science”. Minerva, 1, 54-73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Michael, 1963. “Comments” (on Kuhn’s paper). In Crombie, 1963, 375-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Michael, 1967. The tacit Dimension.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Michael, 1969. Knowing and being.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl, 1945. The Open Society and Its Enemies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl, 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl, 1963. Conjectures and refutations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl, 1972. Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, Derek J. de Solla, 1961. Science Since Babylon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, Willard v. O., 1986. “Reply to Jules Vuillemin”, in Hahn and Schilpp. 619-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, Willard v. O., 1988. “Comments on Agassi’s Remarks”. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 19, 117-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, Edward S., 1987. “Why Ideas are not in the Mind”, in Shimony and Nails, 215-229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, Hans, 1944. Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett, 1962. Diffusion of Innovation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovere, Richard H. 1959. Senator Joe McCarthy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand, 1917. Mysticism and Logic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand, 1940, 1962. An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheibe, Erhard, 1997. “The Problem of Reduction in Special Relativity”. In Ginev and Cohen, 321-342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankey, Howard, 1997. “Kuhn’s Ontological Relativism.” In Ginev and Cohen, 305-329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimony, Abner, 1993. “Comments on Two Theses of Thomas Kuhn”. Search for a Naturalistic World View. Originally in R. S. Cohen and others, Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimony, Abner and Debra Nails, Naturalized Epistemology: A Symposium of Two Decades.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stravinsky, Igor, 1936, 1962. An Autobiography.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, Stephen, 2001. Return to Reason.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuillemin, Jules, 1986. “On Duhem’s and Quine’s Theses”. In Hahn and Schilpp, 595-618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedberg, Anders, 1975. “Decision and Belief in Science.” In Hintikka, 1975, 161-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, Alvin M., 1963. “Criteria for Scientific Choice”. Minerva, 1, 159-171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, E. T., 1913. Reports of the British Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziman, John, 1968. Public Knowledge: An Essay Concerning the Social Dimension of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckermann, Harriet, 1988. “Sociology of Science”, Neil Smelser, editor, Handbook of Sociology, Chapter 16: 511-574.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Agassi, J. (2008). Historiographic essays. In: Science and its History. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 253. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5632-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics