ACTION E-LEARNING

An Exploratory Case Study Examining the Impact of Action Learning on the Design of Management-level Web-based Instruction
  • Deborah DeWolfe Waddill
Part of the Educational Innovation in Economics and Business book series (EIEB, volume 10)

Abstract

Web-based instruction is this century’s most-talked about educational and training media. In an attempt to actualize the power of this tool, organizations are experimenting with innovative methods to improve their learning processes (Yoo, Kanawattanachai, & Citurs, 2002). The resulting courses offered over corporate and educational Intranets   also called Webbased instruction or WBI   present what can be a cost-effective alternative to face-to-face training (Fornaciari, Forte, & Mathews, 1999; Phillips, Phillips, Duresky, & Gaudet, 2002; Roberts, 1998).

Keywords

Beach Stake Undercut 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arbaugh, J. B., J. B. (2000). An exploratory study of the effects of gender on student learning and class participation in an internet-based MBA course. Management Learning, 31 (4), 503–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Brindle, J., J., & Levesque, L., L. (2000). Bridging the gap: Challenges and prescriptions for interactive distance education. Journal of Management Education, 24 (4), 445–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brower, H. H., H. H. (2003). On emulating classroom discussion in a distance-delivered OBHR course: Creating an on-line learning community. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2 (1), 22–36.Google Scholar
  6. Carr, S., S. (2000). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students, http://chronicle.com/free/v46/i23/23a00101.htm, retrieved January 30, 2002.Google Scholar
  7. Cho, S. K., S. K., & Berge, Z. L., Z. L. (2002). Overcoming barriers to distance training and education. Education at a Distance The USDLA Journal, 16 (1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeFillippi, R. J., R. J. (2001). Introduction: Project-based learning, reflective practices and learning outcomes. Management Learning, 32 (1), 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dewey, J., J. (1916). Democracy and Education. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dilworth, R. L., R. L. (1998a). Action learning in a nutshell. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 11 (1), 28–43.Google Scholar
  11. Dilworth, R. L., R. L. (1998b). Setting the stage, Performance Improvement Quarterly, 11 (1), 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dolmans, D., D., Gijselaers, W. H., W. H., Moust, J., J., & De Grave, W., W. (2002). Trends in research on the tutor in problem-based learning: Conclusions and implications for educational practice and research. Medical Teacher, 24 (2), 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Driscoll, M., M. (1998). Web-based Training: Using Technology to Design Adult Learning Experiences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
  14. Driscoll, M., M. (1999). Web-based training in the workplace. Adult Learning, 10 (4), 21–25.Google Scholar
  15. Duffy, T. M., T. M., & Jonassen, D. H., D. H. (Eds.). (1992). Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction, A Conversation (1st ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Eisenhardt, K., K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), 532–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forman, D. C., D. C. (2002). Benefits, costs, and the value of e-learning programs. In A. Rossett, A. (Ed.), The ASTD E-Learning Handbook: Best Practices, Strategies, and Case Studies for an Emerging Field (pp. 398–413). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  18. Fornaciari, C. J., C. J., Forte, M., M., & Mathews, C., C. (1999). Distance education as a strategy: How can your school compete? Journal of Management Education, 23 (6), 703–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Galagan, P. A., P. A. (2000). The e-learning revolution. Training & Development, 54 (12), 24–30.Google Scholar
  20. Gersick, C., C. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31 (1), 9–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gijselaers, W. H., W. H. (Ed.). (1995). Educational Innovation in Economics and Business Administration. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Hall, B., B. (1997). Web-Based Training Cookbook. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  23. Hall, B., B., & LeCavalier, J., J. (November 2000). The case for Level 3, http://www.learningcircuits.org/2000/nov2000/hall.htm, retrieved May 20, 2005.Google Scholar
  24. Hughes, J., J., & Attwell, G., G. (February 2003). A framework for the evaluation of elearning, http://www.theknownet.com/ict_smes_seminars/papers/Hughes_Attwell.html, retrieved May 20, 2005.Google Scholar
  25. Human, S. E., S. E., Kilbourne, L. M., L. M., Clark, T., T., Shriberg, A., A., & Cunningham, B., B. (1999). Using Web-enhanced instruction in an interpersonal skills course. Journal of Management Education, 23 (5), 584–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jonassen, D. H., D. H., Peck, K., K., & Wilson, B. G., B. G. (1999). Learning with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  27. Kanet, J. J., J. J., & Barut, M., M. (2003). Problem-based learning for production and operations management. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 1 (1), 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Keller, J. M., J. M., & Kopp, T. W., T. W. (1987). Application of the ARCS model of motivational design. In C. M. Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.), Instructional Theories in Action: Lessons Illustrating Selected Theories and Models (pp. 289–320). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  29. Khan, B. H., B. H., Waddill, D. D., D. D., & McDonald, J. A., J. A. (2001). Case studies of Web-based training sites. In B. H. Khan, B. H. (Ed.), Web-Based Training (pp. 367–374). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Kirkpatrick, D., D. (1994). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  31. Kirkpatrick, D., D. (1996). Great ideas revisited: Revisiting Kirkpatricks’s four-level model. Training and Development Journal, 50 (1), 54–58.Google Scholar
  32. Knowles, M., M. (1973). The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. Knowles, M. S., M. S. (1984). Andragogy in Action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  34. Knowles, M. S., M. S., Holton, E. F. I., E. F. I., & Swanson, R. A., R. A. (1998). The Adult Learner (5th ed.). Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  35. Marquardt, M. J., M. J. (1999). Action Learning in Action: Transforming Problems and People for World-Class Organizational Learning (1st ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black Publishing.Google Scholar
  36. Marquardt, M. J., M. J. (2004). Optimizing the Power of Action Learning. Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black Publishing.Google Scholar
  37. Marsick, V. J., V. J., & O’Neil, J. A., J. A. (1999). The many faces of action learning. Management Learning, 30 (2), 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marsick, V. J., V. J., Cederholm, L., L., Turner, E., E., & Pearson, T., T. (1992). Actionreflection learning. Training & Development, 46 (8), 63–66.Google Scholar
  39. Martins, L. L., L. L., & Kellermanns, F. W., F. W. (2004). A Model of business school students’ acceptance of a Web-based course management system. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3 (1), 7–26.Google Scholar
  40. Mayberry, E., E. (2005). Kirkpatrick’s level 3: Improving the evaluation of e-learning, http://www.learningcircuits.org/2005/may2005/mayberry.htm, retrieved May 19, 2005.Google Scholar
  41. Nadkarni, S., S. (2003). Instructional methods and mental models of students: An empirical investigation. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2 (4), 335–351.Google Scholar
  42. National Educational Association (NEA). (2000). Quality on the line: Benchmarks for success in Internet-based distance education, http://www.nea.org/ technology/onlinecourseguide. html, retrieved May 17, 2005.Google Scholar
  43. Nucleus Research. (2002). E-learning delivers consistent returns, http://www.NucleusResearch.com, retrieved October 16, 2002.Google Scholar
  44. Parker, A., A. (December 1999). A study of variables that predict dropout from distance education, http://www.outreach.uiuc.edu/ijet/v1n2/parker, retrieved January 30, 2002.Google Scholar
  45. Phillips, J. J., J. J., Phillips, P. P., P. P., Duresky, L. Z., L. Z., & Gaudet, C., C. (2002). Evaluating the ROI of e-learning. In A. Rossett, A. (Ed.), The ASTD E-Learning Handbook: Best Practices, Strategies, and Case Studies for an Emerging Field (pp. 387–397). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  46. Reeve, S. D., S. D. (1998). Action learning and management development: Lesson for Webbased education. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning.Google Scholar
  47. Revans, R. W., R. W. (1980). Action Learning: New Techniques for Management (1st ed.). London: Anchor Press Ltd.Google Scholar
  48. Revans, R. W., R. W. (1982). The Origin and Growth of Action Learning. London: Chartwell Bratt.Google Scholar
  49. Rhodes, C., C., & Garrick, J., J. (2003). Project-based learning and the limits of corporate knowledge. Journal of Management Education, 27 (4), 447–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Roberts, B., B. (1998). Training via the desktop. HRMagazine, 43 (9), 98–104.Google Scholar
  51. Rossett, A., A. (2000). Confessions of a Web dropout. Training, 37 (8), 100.Google Scholar
  52. Rotter, J. B., J. B. (1954). Social Learning and Clinical Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  53. Rotter, J. B., J. B., Seeman, M., M., & Liverant, S., S. (1962). Internal versus external control of reinforcements: A major variable in behavior theory. Paper presented at the Decisions Values and Groups. Proceedings of a conference held at the University of New Mexico, New Mexico.Google Scholar
  54. Saba, F., F. (2000). Research in distance education: A status report. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1 (1), 1–9.Google Scholar
  55. Sandelands, E., E. (1999). Cyber tutoring and learning: How to facilitate action learning online, http://www.mcb.co.uk/imc/news/academic/cyber-tutoring.html, retrieved January 28, 2004.Google Scholar
  56. Savery, J. R., J. R., & Duffy, T. M., T. M. (1996). Problem-based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. In B. G. Wilson, B. G. (Ed.), Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design (pp. 135–148). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  57. Schon, D. A., D. A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  58. Shandler, D., D. (1996). Reengineering the Training Function: How to Align Training with the Corporate Agenda. Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press.Google Scholar
  59. Singh, H., H. (2001). Online implementation of Kirpatrick’s four levels of evaluation using Web databases. In B. H. Khan, B. H. (Ed.), Web-Based Training (pp. 523–529). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  60. Stake, R. E., R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  61. Weasenforth, D., D., Biesenbach-Lucas, S., S., & Meloni, C., C. (2002). Realizing constructivist objectives through collaborative technologies: Threaded discussions. Language Learning & Technology, 6 (3), 58–86.Google Scholar
  62. Yin, R. K., R. K. (Ed.). (2003). Case Study Research Design and Methods (3rd ed.). Vol. 5. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  63. Yoo, Y., Y., Kanawattanachai, P., P., & Citurs, A., A. (2002). Forging into the wired wilderness: A case study of a technology-mediated distributed discussion-based class. Journal of Management Education, 26 (2), 139–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zielinski, D., D. (2000). Can you keep learners online? Training, 37 (3), 64–75.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah DeWolfe Waddill
    • 1
  1. 1.Restek ConsultingViennaUSA

Personalised recommendations