Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences ((DPSS,volume 103))

Abstract

Simple and complex analytical models of root reinforcement and the associated requirements and limitations are reviewed. Simple models include the limiting equilibrium solution and the cable and pile solutions. The complex model is the finite element method (FEM). The simple models were used to analyze published data from laboratory and in situ shear tests and pullout tests on soils reinforced with synthetic materials and root systems. The models can be used for approximations when the model requirements are met. The FEM was used to simulate experiments and provided more detailed information. These results provide insight on the failure mechanisms. This forms the basis for suggestions on models to be used in stability analysis of slopes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abe K and Ziemer R R 1991 Effect of tree roots on a shear zone: modeling reinforced shear stress. Can. J. For. Res. 21, 1012–1019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson S A and Pope R G 1984 The incorporation of soil water physics models into geotechnical studies of landslide behaviour. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium Landslides, Vol. 1, Toronto, ON, pp. 349–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevin K 1982 On subsurface storm flow. J. Sci. Hydrol. 4, 505–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broms B B 1964a Lateral resistance of piles in cohesive soils. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 90, 27–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broms B B 1964b Lateral resistance of piles in cohesionless soils. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 90, 123–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppin N J and Richards I G 1990 Use of Vegetation in Civil Engineering. CIRA/Buttersworth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio F L and Sandler I S 1971 Material model for granular soils. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 97, 935–949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker D C, Gibson R E and Henkel D J 1957 Soil mechanics and work-hardening theory of plasticity. Trans. ASCE 122, 338–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy L, Fourcaud T and Stokes A 2005 A numerical investigation into the influence of soil type and root architecture on tree anchorage. Plant and Soil. 278, 119–134. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-005-7577-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ekanayake J C and Phillips C J 1999 A model for determining thresholds for initiation of shallow landslides, under near-saturated conditions in the East Coast region. NZ J. Hydrol. 38, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Khouly M A 1995 Analysis of soil-reinforcement interaction. PhD dissertation, Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frydman S and Operstein V 2001 Numerical simulation of direct shear of root-reinforced soil. Ground Improvement 5, 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray D H 1991 Discussion on deformation characteristics of reinforced sand in direct shear. J. Geotech. Eng. 117, 1810–1812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray D H and Ohashi H 1983 Mechanics of fiber reinforcement in sand. J. Geotech. Eng. 109, 335–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray D H and Sotir R B 1996 Biotechnical and Soil Bioengineering Slope Stabilization. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenway D R, Anderson M G and Brian-Boys K C 1984 Influence of vegetation on slope stability in Hong Kong. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium Landslides, Vol. 1, Toronto, ON, pp. 399–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetenyi M 1946 Beams on Elastic Foundation. Univ. Mich. Press, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaber M, Mitchell J K, Shen C K and Hua Z K 1987 Behavior of reinforced soil, centrifuge model tests. Final Report, Task B, Fed. Highway Admin. Contract DTFH61-84-C-00073.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewell R A and Pedley M J 1992 Analysis for soil reinforcement with bending stiffness. J. Geotech. Eng. 118, 1505–1528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewell R A and Wroth C P 1987 Direct shear test on reinforced sand. Géotechnique 57, 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan R P C and Rickson R J 1995 Slope Stabilization and Erosion Control. E and FN Spon, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilaweera N S 1994. Effects of tree roots on slope stability: the case of Khao Luang Ain area, southern Thailand. D.T.S. dissertation, Asin Inst. of Tech., Bankok, Thailand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oden J T 1967 Mechanics of Elastic Structures. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Operstein V and Frydman S 2000 The influence of vegetation on soil strength. Ground Improvement 4, 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmeira E M and Milligan G W E 1989 Scale and other factors affecting the results of pull-out tests of grids buried in sand. Géotechnique 39, 511–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumelle C and Schlosser F 1991 Three full-scale experiments of French project on soil nailing: CLOUTERRE. Transp. Res. Rec. No. 1330, 80–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riestenberg M M 1987 Anchoring of thin colluvium on hillslopes in Cincinnati by roots of sugar maple and white ash. PhD dissertation, Univ. of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riestenberg M M and Sovodonick-Dunsford S 1983 The role of woody vegetation in stabilizing slopes in the Cincinnati area, Ohio. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 94, 506–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheichtl H M and Stern R 1996 Ground Bioengineering Techniques. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shewbridge S E and Sitar N 1989 Deformation characteristics of reinforced sand in direct shear. J. Geotech. Eng. 115, 1134–1147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shewbridge S E and Sitar N 1991 Discussion on deformation characteristics of reinforced sand in direct shear. J. Geotech. Eng. 117, 1812–1817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron L J 1977 The shear resistance of root-permeated homogeneous and stratified soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 41, 843–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu T H, McKinnell W P III and Swanston D N 1979 Strength of tree roots and landslides on Prince of Wales Island, Alaska. Can. Geotech. J. 16, 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu T H and Watson A 1998 In-situ shear tests of soil blocks with roots. Can. Geotech. J. 35, 579–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

ALEXIA STOKES IOANNIS SPANOS JOANNE E. NORRIS ERIK CAMMERAAT

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wu, T.H. (2007). Root reinforcement: analyses and experiments. In: STOKES, A., SPANOS, I., NORRIS, J.E., CAMMERAAT, E. (eds) Eco-and Ground Bio-Engineering: The Use of Vegetation to Improve Slope Stability. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences, vol 103. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5593-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics