TROPHIC NETWORK MODELS AND PREDICTION OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES ACCUMULATION IN FOOD WEBS

  • Arturas Razinkovas
Part of the NATO Security through Science Series book series

Abstract

The term food web or trophic network defines a set of interconnected food chains by which energy and materials circulate within an ecosystem. The classical food web could be divided into two broad categories: the grazing web, which typically begins with green plants, algae, or photosynthesizing plankton, and the detrital web, which begins with organic debris. In a grazing web, materials typically pass from plants to herbivores to flesh eaters. In a detrital web, materials pass from plant and animal matter to decomposers as fungi and bacteria, then to detritivores, and then to their predators. In water ecosystems, the classical food web is represented by the planktonic and benthic food webs, which are interconnected. Additionally, the “microbial loop” represents an alternative pathway of carbon flowthat leads from bacteria to protozoa to metazoa, with dissolved organic matter (DOM) being utilized as substrate by the bacteria, which include nanoplankton (2–20 μm in size) and picoplankton (0.2–2 μm in size).

Keywords

Biomass Migration Toxicity Mercury Respiration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Booth, S., D. Zeller, 2005. Mercury, food webs, and marine mammals: implications of diet and climate change for human health, Environ. Health Perspect., 113, 521–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Camanzo, J., C.P. Rice, D.J. Jude, and R. Rossmann, 1987. Organic priority pollutants in nearshore fish fiorn 14 Lake Michigan tributaries and embayments, 1983, J. Great Lakes Res., 13 (3), 296–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carrer, S., B. Halling-Sorensen, and G. Bendoricchio, 2000. Modelling the fate of dioxins in a trophic network by coupling an ecotoxicological and an Ecopath model, Ecol. Modelling, 126 (2–3), 201–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christensen, V., and C.J. Walters, 2004. Ecopath with Ecosim: Methods, capabilities and limitations, Ecol. Modelling, 172, 109–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christensen, Walters, and Pauly, 2005. Ecopath with Ecosim: A User’s Guide, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver.Google Scholar
  6. Gourlay, C., M.H. Tusseau-Vuillemin, J.M. Mouchel, and J. Garric, 2005. The ability of dissolved organic matter (DOM) to influence benzo[a]pyrene bioavailability increases with DOM, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety, 61, 74–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Haffner, G.D., M. Tomczak, and R. Lazar, 1994. Organic contaminant exposure in the Lake St. Clair food web, Hydrobiologia, 281, 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Koelmans, A.A., A. van der Heide, L.M. Knijff, and R.H. Aalderink, 2001. Integrated modelling of eutrophication and organic contaminant fate and effects in aquatic ecosystems: A review, Water Resources, 35, 3517–3536.Google Scholar
  9. Lee, H., 1992. Chapter 12: Models, muddles, and mud: Predicting bioaccumulation of sediment associated pollutants, edited by G.A. Burton, Jr., Sediment Toxicity Assessment. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp. 267–393.Google Scholar
  10. MacDonald, R.W., and J.M. Bewers, 1996. Contaminants in the arctic marine environment: priorities for protection, ICES J. Marine Sci., 53, 537–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. MacDonald, C.R., C.D. Metcalfe, G.C. Balch, and T.L. Metcalfe, 1993. Distribution of PCB congeners in seven lake systems: Interactions between sediment and food-web transport, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 12, 1991–2003.Google Scholar
  12. Morrison, H.A., F.A.P.C. Gobas, R. Lazar, D.M. Whittle, and G.D. Hafier, 1997. Development and verification of a benthic/pelagic food web bioaccumulation model for PCB congeners in western Lake Erie, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 3267–3273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Muir, D., B. Braune, B. DeMarch, R. Norstrom, R. Wagemann, M. Gamberg, K. Poole, R. Addison, D. Bright, M. Dodd, W. Dushenko, J. Earner, M. Evans, B. Elkin, S. Grundy, B. Hargrave, C. Hebert, R. Johnstone, K. Kidd, B. Koenig, L. Lockhart, J. Payne, J. Peddle, and K. Reimer, 1997. Chapter 3: Ecosystem Uptake and Effects, edited by F. Jensen, K. Adare, and R. Shearer, Canadian Arctic Contaminants Assessment Report, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, Ottawa, No. 19, 1–294.Google Scholar
  14. Muir, D.C.G., R.J. Norstrom, and M. Simon, 1988. Organochlorine contaminants in Arctic marine food chains: Accumulation of specific polychlorinated biphenyls and chlordane-related compounds, Environ. Sci.Technol., 22, 1071–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Norstrom, R.J., A.E. McKinnon, A.S.W. DeFreitas, 1976. A bioenergetics-based model for pollutant accumulation by fish—Simulation of PCB and methylmercury residue levels in Ottawa River yellow perch (Perca flavescens), J. Fisheries Res. Board Canada, 33, 348–267.Google Scholar
  16. Pastor, D., J. Boix, V. Fernandez, and J. Albaiges, 1996. Bioaccumulation of organochlorinated contaminants in three estuarine fish species (Mullus barbatus, Mugil cephalus and Dicentrarcus labrax), Marine Pollut. Bull., 32 (3), 257–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Polovina, J.J., 1984a. Model of a coral reef ecosystems I. The ECOPATH model and its application to French Frigate Shoals, Coral Reefs, 3, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Polovina, J.J., 1984b. An overview of the ECOPATH model, Fishbyte, 2, 5–7.Google Scholar
  19. Rowan, D.J., and J.B. Rasmussen, 1992. Why don’t Great Lakes fish reflect environmental concentrations of organic contaminants? An analysis of between-lake variability in the ecological partitioning of PCBs and DDT, J. Great Lakes Res., 18 (4), 724–741.Google Scholar
  20. Schaanning, M.T., K. Hylland, D. Eriksen, T.D. Bergan, J.S. Gunnarson, and J. Skei, 1996. Interactions between eutrophication and contaminants. II. Mobilization and bioaccumulation of Hg and Cd from marine sediments, Marine Pollut. Bull., 33, 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shaw, G.R., and D.W. Connelt, 1986. Chapter 6: Factors controlling bioaccumulation of PCBs, edited by J.S. Waid, PCBs and the Environment, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 121–134.Google Scholar
  22. Sijm, D.T.H.M., W. SeInen, and A. Opperhulzen, 1992. Life-cycle biomagnification study in fish, Environ. Sci.Technol., 26 (11), 2162–2174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. van der Oost, R., A. Opperhuizen, A.K. Satumalay, H. Heida, and N.P.E. Vermeulen, 1996. Biomonitoring aquatic pollution with feral eel (Anguilla anguilla) 1. Bioaccumulation: biota-sediment ratios of PCBs, OCPs, PCDDs and PCDFs, Aquatic Toxicol., 35, 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Walters, C., V. Christensen, and D. Pauly, 1997. Structuring dynamic models of exploited ecosystems from trophic mass-balance assessments Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 7, 139–172.Google Scholar
  25. Winberg, G.G., 1956. Rate of metabolism and food requirements of fishes, Transl. Fish Res. Board Canada, 194, 1–253.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arturas Razinkovas
    • 1
  1. 1.Klaip da UniversityLithuania

Personalised recommendations