Advertisement

MODELING OF LIGHT SCATTERING FROM INHOMOGENEOUS BIOLOGICAL CELLS

  • Andrew K. Dunn
Part of the NATO Science Series book series (NAII, volume 238)

Abstract

This chapter describes the results of a finite-difference time-domain model of light scattering from inhomogeneous biological cells. The FDTD approach enables realistic three-dimensional modeling of light scattering from cells. The effects of small cytoplasmic organelles and nuclear morphology on the angular distribution of scattered light are examined. The results suggest that the small-scale refractive-index variations found in small cytoplasmic organelles and within the nucleus largely determine the scattering properties of cells at larger scattering angles.

Keywords

Scattered Intensity Scatter Cross Section Cytoplasmic Organelle Homogeneous Sphere Large Scattering Angle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alberts, B., Bray, D., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., and Watson, J. (1989). Molecular biology of the cell. Garland Publishing, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Barer, R. and Joseph, S. (1954). Refractometry of living cells. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 95:399–423.Google Scholar
  3. Barer, Robert (1957). Refractometry and interferometry of living cells. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 47:545–556.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bereiter-Han, J., Fox, C., and Thorell, B. (1979). Quantitative reflection contrast microscopy of living cells. Journal of Cell Biology, 82:767–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berenger, Jean-Pierre (1994). A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves. Journal of Computational Physics, 114:185–200.MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. Beuthan, J., Minet, O., Helfman, J., and Muller, G. (1996). The spatial variation of the refractive index in biological cells. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 41:369–382.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Brunsting, A. and Mullaney, P. (1974). Differential light scattering from spherical mammalian cells. Biophysical Journal, 14:439–453.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunn, A. and Richards-Kortum, R. (1996). Three-dimensional computation of light scattering from cells. IEEE Journal of Special Topics in Quantum Electronics, 2:898–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kohl, M. and Cope, M. (1994). Influence of glucose concentration on light scattering in tissue. Optics Letters, 17:2170–2172.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lanni, F., Waggoner, A., and Taylor, D. (1985). Internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. Journal of Cell Biology, 100:1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liao, Z.P.,Wong, H.L., Yang, B.P., and Yuan, Y.F. (1984). A transmitting boundary for transient wave analysis. Sci. Sin., Ser. A, 27:1063–1076.MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu, H., Beauvoit, B., Kimura, M., and Chance, B. (1996). Dependence of tissue optical properties on solute-induced changes in refractive index and osmolarity. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 1:200–211.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. Taflove, Allen (1995). Computational electrodyamics: the finite-difference time-domain method. Artech House.Google Scholar
  14. Vitkin, I., Woolsey, J., Wilson, B., and Anderson, R. (1994). Optical and thermal characterization of natural (sepia oficinalis) melanin. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 59:455–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Yee, K. (1966). Numerical solutions of initial boundary value problems involving maxwell’s equations in isotropic media. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, AP-14:302–307.ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew K. Dunn
    • 1
  1. 1.Biomedical Engineering DepartmentUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations